Abstract
In spite of the expanding role of tax preparers in the tax reporting process, very little research has been directed at how tax preparers make tax-related decisions. This study extends prior research by using tax preparers as opposed to taxpayers as subjects. The judgment of tax preparers presumably can be influenced by three categories of factors: 1) factors relating to the law and regulatory environment, 2) individual differences between professionals, and 3) differences across clients and client conditions. This research has focused on the second and third categories of influence. Individual differences examined were experience, ethical disposition and fear of reprisals related to tax preparer penalties. Client related influences examined were reciprocity demands of an aggressive client and year-end client overpayment/underpayment tax position.
The subjects in our study indicated significant reticence to recommend an aggressive (yet supportable) position to a client noted to want to follow an aggressive strategy. Further, experienced tax professionals indicated resistance to client condition pressures—underpayment tax status and reciprocity pressure.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allingham, M.G., & Sandmo, A. (1972). Income tax evasions: A theoretical analysis.Journal of Public Economics, 1, 323–338.
Benton, A.A., Kelley, H.H., & Liebling, B. (1972). Effects of extremity of offers and concession rate on the outcomes of bargaining.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 47–61.
Chang, O. (1984). The psychological deterrent effect of income tax withholding. Working Paper.
Chang, O.H., Nichols, D.R., & Schultz, J.J. (1987). Taxpayer attitudes toward tax audit risk.Journal of Economic Psychology, 8, 299–309.
Chang, O.H., & Schultz, J.J. (1989). The income tax withholding effect: evidence from TCMP data. Working Paper.
Chi, M.T.H., Glaser, R. & Rees, E. (1982). Expertise in problem solving.Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence, 1, 7–75. Edited by Robert J. Sternberg.
Cialdini, R.B. (1984).Influence — How and Why People Agree to Do Things. New York: William Morrow and Company, Inc.
Cialdini, R.B., Vincent, J.E., Lewis, S.K., Catalan, J., Wheeler, D., & Darby, B.L. (1975). Reciprocal concessions procedure for inducing compliance: The door-in-the-face technique.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 206–215.
Cialdini, R.B., & Ascani, K. (1976). Test of a concession procedure for inducing verbal, behavioral, and further compliance with a request to give blood.Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, No. 3, 295–300.
Duncan, W.A., Larue, D., & Reckers, P.M.J. (1989). An empirical examination of the influence of selected economic and noneconomic variables on decision making by tax professionals.Advances in Taxation, 2, 91–106.
Ellsberg, D. (1961). Risk, ambiguity and the savage axioms.Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75, 643–669.
Fiske, S.T., & Taylor, S.E. (1984).Social cognition. New York: Random House.
Friedrich, O. (1983). Tax cheating-bad and getting worse.Time, 26–32.
Gibbins, M. (1984). Propositions about the psychology of professional judgment in public accounting.Journal of Accounting Research, 22, 103–125.
Gouldner, A.W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement.American Sociological Review, 25, No. 2, 161–178.
Helleloid, R.T. (1989). Ambiguity and the evaluation of client documentation by tax professionals.The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 22–36.
Hite, P.A., & Morrison, P.A. (1986). The tax preparer-client relationship: Some taxpayers' views. Working Paper.
Hite, P.A., Jackson, B.R. & Spicer, M.W. (1988). The effects of decision framing on taxpayer compliance. Working Paper.
Internal Revenue Service, Selected Statistical Series. (Winter 1987–1988).Statistics of Income Bulletin, 100.
Jackson, B.R., & Milliron, V.C. (1986). Tax compliance research: Findings, problems, and prospects.Journal of Accounting Literature, 5, 125–165.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk.Econometrica, 47, No. 2, 263–291.
Kaplan, S.E., & Reckers, P.M.J. (1985). A study of tax evasion judgments.National Tax Journal, 38, 97–102.
Kaplan, S.E., Reckers, P.M.J., & Reynolds, K.D. (1986). An application of attribution and equity theories to tax evasion behavior.Journal of Economic Psychology, 7, 461–476.
Kimbrough, D.C., vs Commission TC Memo 1988-185 (1988).
LaRue, D., & Reckers, P.M.J. (1989). An empirical examination of the influence of selected factors on professional tax preparers' decision processes.Advances in Accounting, 7, 37–50.
Lewis. A. (1982).The Psychology of Taxation. St. Martin's Press: New York.
Lichenstein, S., & Slovic, P. (1971). Reversal of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 46–55.
Long, J., & Caudill, S. (1987). The usage and benefits of paid tax return preparations.National Tax Journal, 35–46.
Robben, H., Webley, P., Elffers, H., & Hessing, D. (June, 1988). Investigating tax evasion in prospect theoretical terms: Evidence from experimental and questionnaire data. Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association, Vail, CO.
Sanders, D.L., & Wyndelts, R.M. (1988). An examination of tax practitioners' decisions under uncertainty. Working Paper.
Schadewald, M.S. (1989). Reference point effects in taxpayer decision making.The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 68–84.
Schoemaker, P.J.H. (1980).Experiments on Decisions Under Risk. Martinus Nijoff: The Netherlands.
Schwarzwald, J., Roz, M., & Zvibel, M. (1979). The applicability of the door-in-the-face technique when established behavioral customs exist.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 9, No. 6, 576–586.
Simmel, G. (1950).The Sociology of George Simmel. Translated and Edited by Kurt H. Wolf. Glencoe, ILL.: Free Press.
Spicer M.W., & Thomas, J.E. (1982). Audit probabilities and the tax evasion decision: An experimental approach.Journal of Economic Psychology, 2, 241–245.
Srinivasan, T. (1973). Tax evasion: A model.Journal of Public Economics, 339–346.
Tversky, A. (1969). Intransitivity of preferences.Psychological Review, 76, 31–48.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases.Science, 185, 1124–1131.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions.Journal of Business, 54, No. 4, 251–278.
Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944).The theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press.
Waller, W., & Felix, W. (1984). The auditor and learning from experience: Some conjectures.Accounting, Organizations and Society, 383–406.
Weiss, L. (1976). The desirability of cheating incentives and randomness in the optimal income tax.Journal of Political Economy, 84, 1343–1352.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lowe, D.J., Reckers, P.M.J. & Wyndelts, R.W. An examination of tax professionals' judgments: The role of experience, client condition and reciprocal obligation. J Bus Psychol 7, 341–357 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01015759
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01015759