The growth and transformation of state lotteries in the United States during the last half of the twentieth century has been dramatic. As lotteries have evolved into high stakes games of a pari-mutuel nature, states have come to rely on them as revenue generators. But lotteries have only limited ability to raise funds for government, and unintended social consequences derived from their growth and evolution may outweigh their revenue generating capacity.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Brenner, G., Montmarquette, C. & Brenner, R. (1987, October).Expenditures on lotteries: What do people say and what do they do? An economic analysis. Working Paper No. 8735, University of Montreal.Google Scholar
- Clotfelter, C., & Cook, P.J. (1989).Selling hope: State lotteries in America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Ezell, J.S. (1960).Fortune's merry wheel. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Kaplan, H.R. (1985). Lottery winners and work commitment: A behavioral test of the American work ethic.Journal of the Institute of Socioeconomic Studies, 10, 82–94.Google Scholar
- Kaplan, H.R. (1987). Lottery winners: The myth and reality.Journal of Gambling Behavior, 3, 168–178.Google Scholar
- Mikesell, J.L. & Zorn, C.K. (1986). State lotteries as fiscal savior or fiscal fraud: A look at the evidence.Public Administration Review, 46, 311–320.Google Scholar
- Szasz, T. (1970).Ideology and insanity. New York: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar