Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 263–274 | Cite as

The impact of the daily lottery on the numbers game: Does legalization make a difference?

  • H. Roy Kaplan
  • William R. Blount
Articles
  • 24 Downloads

Abstract

There has been a profusion of state run legal lotteries over the last two decades. One justification for them has been their supposed diversion of funds from illegal games known as numbers, policy and bolita. Records obtained in a police raid in south Florida provided an opportunity to analyze the impact of Florida' legal lottery on its illegal counterpart. The records ranged over a 13 week period encompassing five weeks prior to the inception of Florida's legal daily numbers and lotto games and seven weeks afterward. While there was a 17 percent decline in monies wagered on the illegal games during the first week of the legal games, illegal wagers quickly rebounded to prelegalization levels.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ashbury, H. (1938).Sucker's progress. New York: Doddmead.Google Scholar
  2. Bloomberg, A. (1988). Personal communication with the director of public relations for the Ohio Lottery.Google Scholar
  3. Braidfoot, L. (1985).Gambling: A deadly game. Nashville, TN: Broadman Press.Google Scholar
  4. Clotfelter, C.T., & Cook, T.J. (1989).Selling hope: State lotteries in America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Commission on the Review of the National Policy Toward Gambling. (1976).Gambling in America. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  6. Ezell, J.S. (1960).Fortune's merry wheel. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Fried, S. (March, 1983). Easy Money.Philadelphia Magazine, pp. 99ff.Google Scholar
  8. Haley A. (1964).The autobiography of Malcolm X. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  9. Kaplan H.R. (1989). The Role of Lotteries in Compulsive Gambling. In Howard Shaffer et al. (Eds.),Compulsive Gambling: Theory, research and practice. Lexington: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  10. Kaplan, L.J., & Maher, J.M. (1970). Economics of the numbers game.American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 29, 391–408.Google Scholar
  11. Knapp Commission. (1973).Report on police corruption. New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar
  12. Light, I. (1977). Numbers gambling among blacks: A financial institution.American Sociological Review, 42, 892–904.Google Scholar
  13. Mikesell, J.L., & Zorn, C.K. (1986). State lotteries as fiscal savior or financial fraud: A look at the evidence.Public Administration Review, 46, 311–320.Google Scholar
  14. Nichol, S. (June, 1989). Illegal lotteries going strong.Fort Lauderdale Sun Sentinel, (18), pp. Al, A15.Google Scholar
  15. Rauzin, E.M. (October, 1981). By the numbers.Miami Magazine, pp. 62ff.Google Scholar
  16. Rubenstin, J.B., & Reuter, P. (1977).Numbers: The routine racket. New York: Policy Sciences Center.Google Scholar
  17. Weber, M. (1946).Essays in sociology. Translated and edited by H.H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Roy Kaplan
    • 1
  • William R. Blount
    • 2
  1. 1.National Conference of Christians and Jews and University of South FloridaUSA
  2. 2.Department of CriminologyUSFTampa
  3. 3.Temple Terrrace

Personalised recommendations