Abstract
A quasi-experimental design was used to compare the effectiveness of preemployment integrity tests at six supermarket chains. Two of the supermarket chains had used some type of overt integrity test and four had not. Responses to an anonymous survey of 234 employees at these six chains were analyzed. Respondents from the chains that did not use preemployment integrity tests perceived significantly higher dollar amounts of employee theft than did respondents for the test-using companies. Implications for the usefulness of preemployment integrity tests are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Campbell, D.T. & Stanley, J.C. (1963).Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Food Marketing Institute. (1989).The food marketing industry speaks, 1989: Loss prevention issues study highlights. Washington, D.C.: Institute Report.
Jones, J.W. (1991,In press).Preemployment honesty testing: Current research and future directions. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
McDaniel, M.A. & Jones, J.W. (1988, August).Honesty testing for personnel selection: A quantitative review. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, The Division of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Atlanta, Georgia.
Slora, K.B., & Boye, M.W. (1989).Employee theft in the supermarket Industry: Final report of findings. Park Ridge, IL: London House, Inc.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jones, J.W., Slora, K.B. & Boye, M.W. Theft reduction through personnel selection: A control group design in the supermarket industry. J Bus Psychol 5, 275–279 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01014337
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01014337