Journal of Business and Psychology

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 223–235 | Cite as

Upper-level managers and whistleblowing: determinants of perceptions of company encouragement and information about where to blow the whistle

  • John P. Keenan
Full Articles


Social Psychology Social Issue 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Brabeck, M. M. 1984. Ethical characteristics of whistle-blowers.Journal of Research in Personality, 18:41–53.Google Scholar
  2. Brief, A. P. and Motowidlo, S. J. 1986. Prosocial Organizational Behaviors.Academy of Management Review, 11, 4: 710–725.Google Scholar
  3. Clinard, M.B. 1983.Corporate ethics and crime: The role of middle management. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  4. Elliston, F., Keenan, J. P., Lockhart, P., and Van Schaick, J. 1985.Whistleblowing: Managing dissent in the workplace. New York, Praeger Press.Google Scholar
  5. Ewing, D.W. 1983.Do it my way-or you're fired. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  6. Glausser, M. 1982. Factors which facilitate or impede upward communication in organizations. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Graham, J. W. 1983. Principled organizational dissent. Doctoral Dissertation, North-western University.Google Scholar
  8. Graham, J. W. 1984. Organizational response to principled organizational dissent. Presented at the 44th meeting of the Academy of Management, Boston.Google Scholar
  9. Graham, J. W. 1986. Principled organizational dissent: A theoretical essay. In B. W. Staw and L. L. Cummings (eds.),Research In Organizational Behavior, 8:1–52.Google Scholar
  10. Greenberger, D. B. Miceli, M. P., and Cohen, D. J. 1987. Oppositionists and group norms: The reciprocal influence of whistle-blowers and co-workers.Journal of Business Ethics, 6:527–542.Google Scholar
  11. Hirschman, A. O. 1970.Exit, voice and loyalty: responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Katz, R. 1955. Skills of an effective administrator. Harvard BusinessReview, January–February: 33–42.Google Scholar
  13. Keenan, J. P. 1983. Effectively responding to whistle-blowing: Guidelines/recommendations for executives and managers. In Leicester R. Moise, (Ed.),Organizational and Policy Development (pp. 163–170), University of Louisville.Google Scholar
  14. Keenan, J. P. 1988. Communication climate, whistleblowing, and the first-level manager: A preliminary study.Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, 247–251.Google Scholar
  15. Keenan, J. P. 1989a. Sex, home office, and whistleblowing: Implications regarding managers' response to fraud, waste and mismanagement. Paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the Southwest Division of the Academy of Management, New Orleans.Google Scholar
  16. Keenan, J. P. 1989b. Upper-level managers and whistleblowing: A preliminary study of the influence of communication climate. Paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  17. Keenan, J. P. 1989c. Whistleblowing and the first-level manager: Determinants of feeling obliged to blow the whistle. Paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the Council on Employee Rights and Responsibilities, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
  18. Kolarksa, L. and Aldrich, H. 1980. Exit, voice, and silence: Consumers' and managers' responses to organizational decline.Organizational Studies, 1:41–58.Google Scholar
  19. Lawrence, P. R. and Lorsch, J. W., 1969.Developing organizations: diagnosis and action. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  20. Mathews, M. C. 1987. Codes of ethics: Organizational behavior and misbehavior. In W. C. Frederick (ed.),Research in corporate social performance and policy, 9:107–130.Google Scholar
  21. Miceli, M. P. and Near, J. P. 1985. Characteristics of organizational climate and perceived wrongdoing associated with whistle-blowing decisions.Personnel Psychology, 38: 525–544.Google Scholar
  22. Miceli, M. P. and Near, J. P. 1987. Whistle-blowers' challenge to human resources practice. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  23. Miceli, M. P., Dozier, J. B., and Near, J. P. 1987. Personal and Situational Determinants of Whistle-blowing. Paper presented at the meeting of the Academy of Management.Google Scholar
  24. Mintzberg, H. A. 1973.The nature of managerial work. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  25. Near, J. P. and Miceli, M. P. 1986. Retaliation against whistle-blowers: Predictors and effects.Journal of Applied Psychology, 71:137–145.Google Scholar
  26. Parmerlee, M. A., Near, J. P., & Jensen, T. C. 1982. Correlates of whistle-blowers' perception of organizational retaliation.Administrative Science Quarterly, 27:17–34.Google Scholar
  27. Rowe, M. P. and Baker, M. 1984. Are you hearing enough employee concerns?Harvard Business Review, May–June: 27–35.Google Scholar
  28. Rushton, J. P. 1984. The altruistic personality: Evidence from laboratory, naturalistic, and self-report perspectives. In E. Staub, D. Bar-Tal, J. Karylowski, & J. Reykowski (eds.),Development and Maintenance of Prosocial Behavior: International Perspectives on Positive Morality (pp. 271–290). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  29. United States Merit Systems Protection Board (USMSPB). 1981.Whistleblowing and the federal employee. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  30. Weinstein, D. 1979.Bureaucratic opposition. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  31. Westin, R. W. (Ed.) 1982.Whistle-blowing. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • John P. Keenan
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Business-Management InstituteUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadison

Personalised recommendations