Skip to main content
Log in

Models of satisfaction with benefits: Research implications based on the nature of the construct

  • Full Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research interest in benefit satisfaction continues to increase. The following paper empirically examines demographic correlates of satisfaction with several common benefits. The differences which result support the consideration of benefit satisfaction as a multi-faceted construct separate from pay level satisfaction. Cautions are offered for future benefit related research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Danehower, C., Miller, T., & Lust, J.A. (1990). A theoretical model of employee satisfaction.Personnel Psychology, currently under review.

  • Dreher, G.F. (1981). Predicting the salary satisfaction of exempt employees.Personnel Psychology, 34, 579–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreher, G.F., Ash, R.A., & Bretz, R.D. (1988). Benefit coverage and employee cost: Critical factors in explaining compensation satisfaction.Personnel Psychology, 41, 237–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heneman, H.G. III. (1985). Pay satisfaction. In Rowland, K. and Ferris, G. (Eds.),Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management (Vol. 3, pp. 115–139). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heneman, H.G. III, & Schwab, D.P. (1985). Pay satisfaction: Its multi-dimensional nature and measurement.International Journal of Psychology, 20, 129–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lust, J.A. (1986). The impact of benefit availability on employee benefit satisfaction. In Ray, D. (Ed.),Proceedings of the Southern Management Association Annual Meeting, pp. 207–209.

  • Lust, J.A. (1987). Correlates of employee benefit satisfaction. In Ray, D. (Ed.),Proceedings of the Southern Management Association Annual Meeting, pp. 112–114.

  • Lust, J.A. (1988). Unionization and fringe benefit satisfaction: A comparison of union versus non-union employees. In Peters, L. and Vaverek, K. (Eds.),Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Southwest Division of the Academy of Management, pp. 202–206.

  • Lust, J.A. (1990). The determinants of employee fringe benefit satisfaction: A replication and revision.Benefits Quarterly, 6, 89–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T., & Danehower, C. (1990). A model of the determinants of benefit satisfaction. In Ray, D. (Ed.),Proceedings of the Southern Management Association Annual Meeting, forthcoming.

  • Scarpello, V., Huber, V., & Vandenberg, R.J. (1986).Effects of compensation practices on satisfaction with compensation. Unpublished manuscript, University of Georgia.

  • Scarpello, V., Huber, V., & Vandenberg, R.J. (1988). Compensation satisfaction: Its measurement and dimensionality.Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 163–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, D.P., & Wallace, M.J., Jr. (1974). Correlates of employee satisfaction with pay.Industrial Relations, 13, 78–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, M.J., Jr., & Fay, C.H. (1988).Compensation theory and practice. Boston, MA: PWS-Kent Publ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M., Northcraft, G.B., & Neale, M.A. (1985). The perceived value of fringe benefits.Personnel Psychology, 38, 309–320.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lust, J.A., Danehower, C. Models of satisfaction with benefits: Research implications based on the nature of the construct. J Bus Psychol 5, 213–221 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01014333

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01014333

Keywords

Navigation