Skip to main content
Log in

Consumer price limits and the brand effect

  • Full Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of brand name present/absent condition on consumer price limits was examined in an experimental setting. The findings of this study have important implications for pricing managers. The results support the past findings that brand name affects price perception. Branded products are perceived to be higher priced than unbranded products (higher acceptable price). That is, branded products seem to command a price premium as compared to unbranded products. The findings suggest that the well-known brand name should be positioned in the upper acceptable price range and the not so well-known brand names in the lower acceptable price range. This brand positioning strategy, in turn, will determine the product's position in the product line, the marketplace, its competition, and its use patterns. Price is very much a part of the product and branding policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bettman, James R. (1979).An Information Processing Theory of Consumer Research, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.

  • Cox, Anthony D. (1986). New Evidence Concerning Consumer Price Limits. In R. Lutz (Ed.).Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 13 (pp. 268–271). Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fouilhe, Pierre (1970). The Subject Evaluation of Price. In Bernard Taylor & Gordon Wills (Eds.),Pricing Strategy, (pp. 89–97). Princeton, NJ: Brandon Systems Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines, George H., (1974). Process Models of Consumer Decision Making. In G. David Hughes and Michael L. Ray (Eds.),Buyer/Consumer Information Processing (pp.89–107), Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, Jacob & Olson, Jerry C. (1977). Consumer Response to Price: An Attitudinal, Information Processing Perspective. InMoving Ahead with Attitude Research (pp. 73–86), Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • — & Szybillo, George J., & Busato-Schach, J., (1977). Information Acquisition Behavior in Brand Choice Situation.Journal of Consumer Research, 3, 209–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosenko, Rustan and Rahtz, Don. (1988). Buyer Market Price Knowledge Influence on Acceptable Price Range and Price Limits. In Michael J. Houston (Ed.).Advances in Consumer Research, Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, D. R., & Bloch, Peter H., & Black, William C., (1988). Correlates of Price Acceptability.Journal of Consumer Research, Volume 15, 243–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monroe, Kent B. (1971). Measuring Price Thresholds by Psychophysics and Latitudes of Acceptance.Journal of Marketing Research, 8, 460–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1973). Buyers Subjective Perception of Price.Journal of Marketing Research, 10, 70–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • — & M. Venkatesan (1969). The Concepts of Price Limits and Psychophysical Measurement: A Laboratory Experiment. In P.R. McDonald (Ed.),Marketing Involvement in Society and the Economy (pp.345–351). Chicago: American Marketing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • — & Petroshius, Susan M., (1981). Buyers' Subjective Perceptions of Price: An Update of the Evidence. In Thomas S. Robertson and Harold Kassarjian (Eds.),Perspectives in Consumer Behavior. (43–55). 3 rd. edition, Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • — & Krishnan, R., (1985). The Effect of Price on Subjective Product Evaluations. In J. Jacoby and J. Olson (Eds.),Perceived quality: How consumers view Stores and Merchandise (pp. 209–232). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books,

    Google Scholar 

  • Raju, P.S. (1977). Product Familiarity, Brand Familiarity and Price Influences on Product Evaluations. In W. Perreault (Ed.),Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 4 (pp. 64–71), Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, C., (1963). Social Categorization as a Function of Latitude of Acceptance and Series Range.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 67, 148–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, M., & Carolyn Sherif & Nebergall R., (1965).Attitude and Attitude Change. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • — & Hovland, Carl I., (1961).Social Judgment: assimilation and Contrast Effects in Communications and Attitude Change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoetzel, Jean (1970). Psychological/ Sociological Aspects of Price. In Bernard Taylor and Gordon Wills (Eds.).Pricing Research, (pp. 70–74), Princeton, NJ: Brandon Systems Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, John J. & Chiu, John S.Y. & Allen, Douglas (1981). Generics: Their Impact on National and Private Brands. In A. Mitchell (Ed.).Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 9 (pp.195–200). Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kosenko, R., Krishnan, R. Consumer price limits and the brand effect. J Bus Psychol 5, 153–163 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01014329

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01014329

Keywords

Navigation