Skip to main content

Unanswered questions in assessment center research

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

This study compared the predictive validity of two types of overall assessment center ratings (clinical and mechanical) and two types of performance ratings (supervisor and subordinate). Data were gathered on approximately 50 law enforcement agency managers over a four-year time span. Results indicated that clinical predictions were not significantly better than mechanical ones and that prior performance ratings were better predictors of future performance ratings than were assessment centers. Further, dimension ratings within the assessment center were found to be unrelated to ratings of the same dimensions on the job four years later, supporting the notion of subtle criterion contamination (Klimoski & Strickland, 1977) and raising questions about the central assumptions underlying the assessment center approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Bernardin, H. J., & Beatty, R. W. (1984).Performance appraisal:. Boston: Kent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borman, W. C. (1982). Validity of behavioral assessment for predicting recruiter performance.Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnette, M. D., & Borman, W. C. (1979). Personnel selection and classification systems.Annual Review of Psychology, 30, 477–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, L. F., & Quaintance, M. K. (1982). Survey of assessment center use in state and local government.Journal of Assessment Center Technology, 5(1), 9–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichs, J. R. (1978). An eight-year follow-up of a management assessment center.Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 596–601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huck, J. R., & Bray, D. W. (1976). Management assessment center evaluations and subsequent job performance of white and black females.Personnel Psychology, 29, 13–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J. E., & Hunter, R. F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance.Psychological Bulletin, 96, 72–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimoski, R. J., & Strickland, W. J. (1977). Assessment centers: Valid or merely prescient.Personnel Psychology, 30, 353–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimoski, R. J., & Strickland, W. J. (1981).A comparative view of assessment centers: A case analysis. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Peterson, D. K., & Pitz, G. F. (1986). Effect of input from a mechanical model on clinical judgment.Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 163–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, C. J. (1985). Individual decision processes in an assessment center.Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 737–746.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, P. R. (1982). A critical look at some common beliefs about assessment centers.Public Personnel Management, 11, 140–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, P. R., & Dreher, G. F. (1982). Constructs and assessment center dimensions: Some troubling empirical findings.Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 401–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, P. R., & Hakel, M. D. (1979). Temporal stability and individual differences in using assessment information to form overall ratings.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23, 120–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, P. R., & Wilson, M. A. (1982). Factors affecting consensus judgment process in managerial assessment centers.Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 10–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, J. (1966). Measurementand prediction, clinicaland statistical.Psychological Bulletin, 66, 178–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, N., Gooding, R. Z., Noe, R. A., & Kirsch, M. (1984). Metaanalysis of validity studies published between 1964 and 1982 and the investigation of study characteristics.Personnel Psychology, 37, 407–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, G. C. III, & Byham, W. C. (1982).Assessment centers and managerial performance. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnage, J. J., & Muchinsky, P. M. (1984). A comparison of the predictive validity of assessment center evaluations versus traditional measures in forecasting supervisory job performance: Interpretive implications of criterion distortion for the assessment paradigm.Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 595–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernimont, P. F., & Campbell, J. P. (1968). Signs, samples, and criteria.Journal of Applied Psychology, 52, 372–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wingrove, J., Jones, A., & Herriot, P. (1985). The predictive validity of pre- and post-discussion assessment centre ratings.Journal of Occupational Psychology, 58, 189–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wollowick, H. B., & McNamara, W. J. (1969). Relationship of the components of an assessment center to management success.Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 348–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zedeck, S., & Cascio, W. F. (1984). Psychological issues in personnel decisions.Annual Review of Psychology, 35, 461–518.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McEvoy, G.M., Beatty, R.W. & Bernardin, H.J. Unanswered questions in assessment center research. J Bus Psychol 2, 97–111 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01014205

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01014205

Keywords

  • Performance Rating
  • Social Psychology
  • Good Predictor
  • Time Span
  • Center Research