Journal of Business and Psychology

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 217–227 | Cite as

Should assessment center dimension ratings be mechanically-derived?

  • Joan Pynes
  • H. John Bernardin
  • Arthur L. Benton
  • Glenn M. McEvoy
Articles

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between consensusderived and mechanically-derived assessment center ratings using a sample of 110 police candidates. It was determined that the two sets of dimension ratings were highly correlated (medianr=.83). Further, the mechanically-derived and the consensus-derived assessment ratings both correlated with the overall assessment ratings (OAR) at .71. It was estimated that the organization in this study could save $6137.92 a year, and $36.89 per assessee by eliminating the team meeting (consensus decision-making).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bernardin, H. J., & Beatty, R. W. (1984).Performance appraisal: Assessing human behavior at work. Boston: Kent Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  2. Borman, W. C. (1982). Validity of behavioral assessment for predicting military recruiter performance.Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(1), 3–9.Google Scholar
  3. Bray, D. W., & Campbell, R. J. (1968). Selection of salesmen by means of an assessment center.Journal of Applied Psychology, 52(1), 36–41.Google Scholar
  4. Byham, W. C., & Thornton, G. C., III (1986). Assessment centers. In R. A. Berk (Ed.),Performance assessment methods and applications (pp. 143–165). Baltimore: The John Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cascio, W. F. (1982).Costing human resources: The financial impact of behavior in organizations. Boston: Kent Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  6. Pralicx, R. D., & Raju, N. S. (1982). A comparision of five methods for combining multiple criteria into a single composite.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42, 823–827.Google Scholar
  7. Gilbert, P. J. (1981). An investigation of clinical and mechanical combination of assessment center data.Journal of Assessment Center Technology, 4(2), 1–10.Google Scholar
  8. Howard, A. (1974). An assessment of assessment centers.Academy of Management Journal, 17(1), 115–134.Google Scholar
  9. Hunter, J. E. & Hunter, R. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance.Psychological Bulletin, 96(1), 72–98.Google Scholar
  10. Korman, A. K. (1968). The prediction of managerial performance: A review.Personnel Psychology, 21, 295–322.Google Scholar
  11. Meehl, P. E. (1954).Clinical vs. statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and review of the evidence. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  12. McEvoy, G. M., Beatty, R. W., & Bernardin, H. J. (in press). Unanswered questions in assessment center research.Journal of Business and Psychology Google Scholar
  13. Mendoza, R. H. & Craig, L. (1983a). An integrated selection system for entry-level criminal justice personnel featuring the assessment center approach.Journal of Assessment Center Technology, 6(1), 1–7.Google Scholar
  14. Mendoza, R. H. & Craig, L. (1983b).The Dade-Miami Criminal Justice Assessment Center: One year later. Paper presented at the 1983 Academy of Criminal Justice Science Meeting, San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
  15. Mitchel, J. O. (1975). Assessment center validity: A longitudinal study.Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(5), 573–579.Google Scholar
  16. Moses, J. L. (1985). Using clinical methods in a high-level management assessment center. In J. Bernardin and D. Bownas (Eds.)Personality assessment in organizations. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  17. Sackett, P. R., & Wilson, M.A. (1982). Factors affecting consensus judgment process in managerial assessment centers.Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(1), 10–17.Google Scholar
  18. Sawyer, J. (1966). Measurement and Prediction, Clinical and Statistical,Psychological Bulletin, 66, 178–200.Google Scholar
  19. Task Force on assessment center standards, (1980). Standards and ethical considerations for assessment center operations.Personnel Administrator, 25(2), 35–38.Google Scholar
  20. Tziner, A., & Dolan, S. (1982). Validity of an assessment center for identifying future female officers in the military.Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(6), 728–736.Google Scholar
  21. Walsh, J. P., Weinberg, R. M., & Fairfield, M. L. (1986). The effects of gender on assessment center evaluations. Paper presented at the Academy of Management, Chicago, II.Google Scholar
  22. Wollowick, H. B., & McNamara, W. J. (1969). Relationship of the components of an assessment center to management success.Journal of Applied Psychology, 53(5), 348–352.Google Scholar
  23. Zedeck, S., & Cascio, W. F. (1984). Psychological issues in personnel decisions.Annual Review of Psychology, 35, 461–518.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joan Pynes
    • 1
  • H. John Bernardin
    • 1
  • Arthur L. Benton
    • 2
  • Glenn M. McEvoy
    • 3
  1. 1.College of Business and Public AdministrationFlorida Atlantic UniversityBoca Raton
  2. 2.Dade-Miami Criminal Justice Assessment CenterUSA
  3. 3.Utah State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations