Skip to main content
Log in

Validation of a personality measure of managerial performance

  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent interest in the characteristics of effective managers raises the notion that personality factors may be part of the effectiveness syndrome. Modern research in personality systematics makes it possible to refine and extend earlier analyses of this topic. A job analysis of three levels of management in a large trucking company identified the personality characteristics of good managers, as described by peers and subordinates. These managers and a large group of incumbents (n=372) completed the Hogan Personality Inventory (HPI). Managers were assigned scores reflecting their status in the organization; they also were rated by their supervisors. A subset of HPI components were significantly associated with the criteria, with correlations ranging from .22 to .66. These components were combined and used in five separate validity studies. The resulting measure was significantly associated with managerial performance in a variety of organizational settings. These results are consistent with the growing body of evidence suggesting that a coherent set of noncognitive characteristics promotes managerial performance across organizational types.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andberg, M. (1988).Evaluating personality measures for selecting retail grocery personnel. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronoff, J., & Wilson, J.P. (1985).Personality in the social process. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentz, V.J. (1985, August). A view from the top: A 30-year perspective of research devoted to the discovery, description, and prediction of executive behavior. Paper presented at the 92nd annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles.

  • Bray, D.W. (1982). The assessment center and the study of lives.American Psychologist, 37, 180–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J.P., Dunnette, M.D., Lawler, E.E., & Weick, K.W., Jr. (1970).Managerial behavior, performance, and effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, K.E. & Clark, M.B. (Eds.) (1990).Measures of leadership. West Orange, NJ: Leadership Library of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.Psychometrica, 16, 297–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselli, E.E. (1966).The validity of occupational aptitude tests. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, H.G. (1984). A managerial potential scale for the California Psychological Inventory.Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 283–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, H.G. (1987).California Psychological Inventory administrator's guide. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guion, R.M. (1987). Changing view for personnel selection research.Personnel Psychology, 40, 199–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzberg, F. (1966).Work and the nature of man. Cleveland: World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, J., & Hogan, R. (1986).Hogan personnel selection series manual. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, J., & Zenke, L. L. (1986). Dollar-value utility of alternate procedures for selecting school principals.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 935–945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, R. (1986).Hogan Personality Inventory manual. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, R., & Hogan, J. (1991). Personality and status. In D.G. Gilbert and J.J. Conley (Eds.),Personality, social skills, and psychopathology. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, R., DeSoto, C.B., and Solano, C. (1977). Traits, tests, and personality research.American Psychologist, 34, 255–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, E.P. & Julian, J.W. (1969). Contemporary trends in the analysis of the leadership process.Psychological Bulletin, 71, 387–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, M.W., & Lombardo, M.M. (1983).Off the track: Why and how successful executives get derailed. (Tech. Rep. 21). Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Megargee, E.I., & Carbonell, J.L. (1988). Evaluating leadership with the CPI. In C.D. Spielberger & J.N. Butcher (Eds.),Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 7, pp 203–209). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muchinsky, P.M. (1986).Validation documentation for the development of a personnel selection test battery for insurance underwriters and claims analysts. Ames, IA: Iowa State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muchinsky, P.M. (1987).Validation documentation for the development of a personnel selection test battery for the job of office manager. Cedar Rapids, IA: Teleconnect.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stogdill, R.M. (1948). Personal factors associated with leadership.Journal of Psychology, 25, 35–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stogdill, R.M. (1974).Handbook of leadership. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., & Clark, L.A. (1984). Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive emotional states.Psychological Bulletin, 96, 465–490.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hogan, J., Hogan, R. & Murtha, T. Validation of a personality measure of managerial performance. J Bus Psychol 7, 225–237 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01013931

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01013931

Keywords

Navigation