Skip to main content
Log in

Domains of subjective well-being in farm men and women

  • Published:
Journal of Family and Economic Issues Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Global satisfaction in 1,110 farm residents are measured as a weighted average of satisfaction with eight aspects of life, with the results supporting a goal-achievement model of well-being. In a stepwise regression analysis (R2=0.472), global satisfaction is most strongly related to satisfaction with control over one's life, followed by satisfaction with family and financial matters. The relative contributions of the satisfaction domains to global satisfaction are a function of gender and off-farm employment status.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbey, A., & Andrews, F. M. (1986). Modeling the psychological determinants of life quality. In F. M. Andrews (Ed.),Research on the quality of life (pp. 85–116). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research, Survey Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1974). Developing measures of perceived life quality: Results from several national surveys.Social Indicators Research, 1, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976).Social indicators of well-being: Americans' perceptions of life quality. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlett, P. F. (1986). Part-time farming: Saving the farm or saving the life-style?Rural Sociology, 51, 289–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrow, G. M. (1989).Aging, the individual, and society (4th ed.). St. Paul: West Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bharadwaj, L., & Wilkening, E. A. (1977). The prediction of perceived well-being.Social Indicators Research, 4, 421–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. (1981).The sense of well-being in America: Recent patterns and trends. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976).The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemente, F., & Sauer, W. J. (1976). Life satisfaction in the United States.Social Forces, 54, 621–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughenour, C. M., & Christenson, J. A. (1980).Is the small farm beautiful? A study of agricultural structure and quality of life. Paper presented at the 5th World Congress of Rural Sociology, Mexico City, Mexico.

  • Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being.Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, D. A. (1978).Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, D. A., & Tremblay, K. R., Jr. (1977). The quality of life in rural America.Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 429, 115–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draughn, P. S., Little, L. F., Wozniak, P., Knaub, P. K., Weeks, O., & Smith, C. (1988). Multiple roles, lifestyle satisfaction, and marital happiness among farm wives.Home Economics Research Journal, 17, 63–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draughn, P. S., & Rutledge, C. M. (1982). Working wives: Their impact on perceptions of role competency of middle-age husbands.Home Economics Research Journal, 10, 391–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, R. M., & Kulik, J. C. (1981). A multilevel model of life satisfaction: Effects of individual characteristics and neighborhood composition.American Sociological Review, 46, 840–850.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hankiss, E. (1980). Structural variables in cross-cultural research of the quality of life. In A. Szalai & F. M. Andrews (Eds.),The quality of life: Comparative studies (pp. 41–56). Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (1978). Value priorities, life satisfaction, and political dissatisfaction among western publics.Comparative Studies in Sociology 1, 173–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R., & Rabier, J. (1986). Aspirations adapt to situations — but why are the Belgians so much happier than the French? In F. M. Andrews (Ed.),Research on the quality of life (pp. 1–56). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research, Survey Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., & Rosenfeld, R. A. (1981).American farm women: Findings from a national survey (NORC Report No. 130). Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, M., & Cowan, P. A. (1989). Re-thinking the connections among “work” and “family” and well-being. In E. Goldsmith (Ed.),Work and family: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 61–90). Newbury Park, CA: Select Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knaub, P. K., Draughn P. S., Wozniak, P., Little, L. F., Smith, C., & Weeks, O. (1988). Wives employed off the farm: Impact on lifestyle satisfaction.Home Economics Research Journal, 17, 36–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knaub, P. K., & Parkhurst, A. M. (1987). Strengths of dual-career families: Perceptions of husbands and wives. In H. J. Lingren, L. Kimmons, P. Lee, G. Rowe, L. Rottman, L. Schwab, & R. William (Eds.),Family strengths: Pathways to well-being (pp. 27–39). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Center for Family Strengths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marans, R. W., Dillman, D. A., & Keller, J. (1980).Perceptions of life quality in rural America. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research, Survey Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKennell, A., Atkinson, T., & Andrews, F. M. (1980). Structural constancies in surveys of perceived well-being. In A. Szalai & F. M. Andrews (Eds.),The quality of life: Comparative studies (pp. 111–128). Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (1983). Satisfaction and happiness in a rural northern resource community.Social Indicators Research, 13, 225–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (1986). Job satisfaction, marital satisfaction, and the quality of life: A review and a preview. In F. M. Andrews (Ed.),Research on the quality of life (pp. 57–83). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research, Survey Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. K., & Crader, K. W. (1979). Rural-urban differences in two dimensions of community satisfaction.Rural Sociology, 44, 489–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molnar, J. J. (1985). Determinants of subjective well-being among farm operators: Characteristics of the individual and the farm.Rural Sociology, 50, 141–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, J. H. (1977). The work-family role system.Social Problems, 24, 417–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, P. C., Nevaldine, A., & Titus, S. L. (1978). Farm families: Relation of significant attributes of farming to family interaction.International Journal of Sociology of the Family, 8, 89–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, R. A. (1985).Farm women: Work, farm, and family in the United States. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholl, K. K. (1983). Farm women's triad of roles.Family Economics Review, 1983(1), 10–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel, R. G. D., & Torrie, J. H. (1980).Principles and procedures of statistics: A biometrical approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay, K. R., Jr., Walker, F. S., & Dillman, D. A. (1983). The quality of life experienced by rural families. In R. T. Coward & W. M. Smith, Jr.,Family services: Issues and opportunities in contemporary rural America (pp. 26–40). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voydanoff, P. (1989). Work and family: A review and expanded conceptualization. In E. Goldsmith (Ed.),Work and family: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 1–22). Newbury Park, CA: Select Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkening, E. A. (1982). Subjective indicators and the quality of life. In R. M. Hauser, D. Mechanic, A. O. Haller, & T. S. Hauser (Eds.),Social structure and behavior: Essays in honor of William Hamilton Newell (pp. 429–441). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wozniak, P. J., Draughn P. S., & Perch, K. L. (1988). A multi-state study of off-farm employment.Home Economics Research Journal, 17, 10–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wozniak, P. J., & Scholl, K. K. (1988). Employment decisions of farm couples: Fulltime or part-time farming?Home Economics Research Journal, 17, 20–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wozniak, P. J., & Scholl, K. K. (1990). Employment motivations of farm spouses.Life-styles: Family and Economic Issues, 11, 321–342.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This project was sponsored by the Cooperative State Research Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station under the title “Farm Wife's External Employment, Family Economic Productivity and Family Functioning (S-191).” Approved for publication by the Director of the Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station as manuscript number 92-25-6175. Please direct communications to Patricia J. Wozniak, Department of Experimental Statistics, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803.

Her research interests include family life and family economics, the application of statistics to the social sciences, and biostatistics.

Her research interests include farm families, changing roles of family members, and gerontology.

Her research interests include the impact of work on families.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wozniak, P.J., Draughn, P.S. & Knaub, P.K. Domains of subjective well-being in farm men and women. J Fam Econ Iss 14, 97–114 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01013800

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01013800

Key words

Navigation