Abstract
This article applies the California Psychological Inventory (CPI) to the prediction of the rated performance of junior officers in the U. S. Coast Guard. The study uses Harrison Gough's recently published structural scales or “vectors” for the CPI and contrasts the predictive validity of the structural scales with that of the original scales based on “folk concepts.” For 85 graduates of the U. S. Coast Guard Academy's class of 1986, performance during the first two years following graduation was summarized in an overall rating derived from regular, semi-annual effectiveness reports. CPI vectors calculated from data that had been gathered during the summer of 1982 effectively predicted leadership performance and provided some support for Gough's typological “cuboid” model of personality. While the structural scales offered a relatively compact description of personality, several of the individual folk scales, notablyDominance, performed as well as or better than the structural scales as predictors of the performance criterion. The implications of the results, both for the use of the CPI and for the utility of the higher-order personality constructs represented by the structural scales, are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barrick, M. R., and Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis.Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.
Baucom, D. H. (1985). Review of the California Psychological Inventory. In J. V. Mitchell (Ed.),The Ninth Mental Measurements Yearbook. Lincoln, Nebraska: The Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
Block, J. and Bailey, D. (1955).Q-sort item analyses of a number of MMPI scales. Officer Education Research Laboratory, Technical Memorandum, OERL-TM-55-7.
Campbell, D. (1987).Psychological test profiles of brigadier generals: Warmongers or decisive warriors? Invited address, Division 14, American Psychological Association Convention, New York, NY.
Crites, J. O. (1964a). The California Psychological Inventory I: As a measure of the normal personality.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 11, 199–202.
Crites, J. O. (1964b). The California Psychological Inventory II: As a measure of client personality.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 11, 299–306.
Dahlstrom, W. G., Welsh, G. S., and Dahlstrom, L. E. (1972).An MMPI Handbook, Volume I: Clinical Interpretation. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Dawis, R. V., and Lofquist, L. H. (1984).A Psychological Theory of Work Adjustment. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Eysenck, H. J. (1985). Review of the California Psychological Inventory. In J. V. Mitchell (Ed.),The Ninth Mental Measurements Yearbook. Lincoln, Nebraska: The Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
Goldberg, L. R. (1972). Review of the California Psychological Inventory. In O. K. Buros (Ed.),The Seventh Mental Measurements Yearbook. Highland Park, NJ: Gryphon Press.
Goldberg, L. R. (1980).Some ruminations about the structure of individual differences: Developing a common lexicon for the major characteristics of human personality. Presented at the meeting of the Western Psychological Association, Honolulu, Hawaii.
Gough, H. G. (1957).Manual for the California Psychological Inventory. Palo Alto, Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc.
Gough, H. G. (1968). An interpreter's syllabus for the California Psychological Inventory. In P. McReynolds (Ed.),Advances in Psychological Assessment (Vol 1). Palo Alto, California: Science and Behavior Books.
Gough, H. G. (1987a).California Psychological Inventory Administrator's Guide. Palo Alto, California: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Gough, H. G. (1987b). Some implications for managerial style of interpersonal and normative orientations. Paper presented at the symposium,New perspectives on personality and job performance, Ronald C. Page, Chair, American Psychological Association meeting. New York City, NY.
Gough, H. G. (1988).Testing for leadership with the California Psychological Inventory Paper presented at the Center for Creative Leadership Conference on Psychological Measures and Leadership. San Antonio, Texas.
Gough, H. G., McKee, M. G., and Yandell, R. J. (1955).Adjective check list analyses of a number of selected psychometric and assessment variables. Officer Education Research Laboratory, Technical Memorandum, OERL-TM-55-10.
Gynther, M. D. (1978). Review of the California Psychological Inventory. In O. K. Buros (Ed.),The Eighth Mental Measurements Yearbook (Vol. 1, pp. 733–736). Highland Park, NJ: Gryphon Press.
Hobert, R., and Dunnette, M. D. (1968). Development of moderator variables to enhance the prediction of managerial effectiveness.Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 50–64.
Hogan, R. (1983). A socioanalytic theory of personality. In M. M. Page (Ed.),Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1982: Personality—Current Theory and Research. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, p. 55–89.
Hogan, R., Jones, W. H., and Cheek, J. M. (1984). Socioanalytic theory: An alternative to armadillo psychology. In B. Schlenker (Ed.),The self and social life. New York: McGraw-Hill, p. 175–198.
John, O. P. (1990). The big-five factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.),Handbook of Personality Theory and Research. New York: Guilford, p. 66–100.
Johnson, J. A. (1981). The “self-disclosure” and “self-presentation” views of item response dynamics and personality scale validity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 761–769.
Kamp, J. D., and Hough, L. M. (1988). Utility of personality assessment: A review and integration of the literature. In L. M. Hough (Ed.),Utility of temperament, biodata, and interest assessment for predicting job performance: A review and integration of the literature (ARI Research Note No. 88-02, p. 1–90). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
Karni, E. S. and Levin, J. (1972). The use of smallest space analysis in studying scale structure: An application to the California Psychological Inventory.Journal of Applied Psychology, 44, 341–346.
McCrae, R. R. and Costa, P. T. (1985). Updating Norman's “adequate taxonomy”: Intelligence and personality dimensions in natural language and questionnaires.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49, 710–721.
McCrae, R. R. and Costa, P. T. Jr. (1986). Clinical assessment can benefit from recent advances in personality psychology.American Psychologist, 41, 1001–1003.
Megargee, E. I. (1972).The California Psychological Handbook. San Francisco, California: Jossey Bass.
Megargee, E. I. and Carbonell, J. L. (1988). Evaluating leadership with the CPI. In C. D. Spielberger and J. N. Butcher (Eds.),Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 7, p. 203–209). Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Tett, R. P., Jackson, D. N., and Rothstein, M. (1991). Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analytic review.Personnel Psychology, 44, 703–742.
Walsh, J. A. (1972). Review of the California Psychological Inventory, In O. K. Buros (Ed.),The Seventh Mental Measurements Yearbook. Highland Park, NJ: Gryphon Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The authors would like to thank Harrison Gough for his comments and helpful suggestions on an earlier version of this article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Blake, R.J., Potter, E.H. & Slimak, R.E. Validation of the structural scales of the CPI for predicting the performance of junior officers in the U. S. Coast Guard. J Bus Psychol 7, 431–448 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01013757
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01013757