Journal of Business and Psychology

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 9–23 | Cite as

The problem of business ethics: Oxymoron or inadequate vocabulary?

  • Jon M. Shepard
  • Jon Shepard
  • Richard E. Wokutch
Special Issue Articles

Abstract

Recently critics have faulted American business schools for failing to impart to their students an understanding of ethics and its role in business. In this paper, we agree and attribute this situation, at least in part, to the need for a vocabulary of ethics and a failure to communicate Adam Smith's moral orientation to capitalism. So long as business schools fail to recognize explicitly that Smith, whoseThe Wealth of Nations serves as an intellectual backdrop for business school curricula, did in fact provide a place for ethics in capitalist economic relations (indeed, some would argue a dominant place), they will continue to advocate implicitly the theory of amorality in business—the idea that ethics has no place in business. By examining Smith's ethical arguments we can explicate the moral underpinnings of stakeholder analysis, a currently popular approach to management decision-making.

Keywords

Social Psychology Business Ethic Social Issue Business School School Curriculum 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackerman, R. W. (1975).The Social Challenge to Business. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bowie, N. E. (1991). Challenging the egoistic paradigm.Business Ethics Quarterly. 1, 1–21.Google Scholar
  3. Brenner, S. and Molander, A. (1977). Is the ethics of business changing?Harvard Business Review. 55, 57–71.Google Scholar
  4. Cavanagh, G. F. (1990).American Business Values (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Collins, D. (1988). Adam Smith's social contract: The proper role of individual liberty and government intervention in 18th century society.Business & Professional Ethics Journal. 7, 119–146.Google Scholar
  6. Cooley, C. H. (1902).Human Nature and the Social Order. New York: Scribner's.Google Scholar
  7. Corporate Ethics: A Prime Business Asset. (1988). New York: The Business Roundtable.Google Scholar
  8. deVries, P. H. (1989). Adam Smith's “theory” of justice: Business ethics themes inThe Wealth of Nations.Business & Professional Ethics Journal. 8, 37–55.Google Scholar
  9. Etzioni, A. (1988).The Moral Dimension. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  10. Frank, R.Passions Within Reason. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  11. Freeman, R. E. (1984).Strategic Management. Boston: Pittmann.Google Scholar
  12. Freeman, R. E. & Gilbert, D. R. (1988).Corporate Strategy and the Search for Ethics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  13. Frederick, W. C. (1978). From CSR1 to CSR2: The maturing of business-and-society thought. Working Paper No. 279, Graduate School of Business, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  14. Frederick, W. C. (1986). Toward CSR3: Why ethical analysis is indispensable and unavoidable in corporate affairs.California Management Review. 28, 126–141.Google Scholar
  15. Frederick, W. C., Davis, K., and Post, J. E. (1988).Business and Society. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  16. Friedman, M. (1962).Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits.New York Times Magazine. September 13, 122–126.Google Scholar
  18. Goodpaster, K. (1991). Business ethics and stakeholder analysis. 1, 53–71.Google Scholar
  19. Hunt, M. (1990).The Compassionate Beast. New York: William Morrow and Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  20. Kalberg, S. (1980). Max Weber's types of rationality: Cornerstones for the analysis of rationalization process in history.American Journal of Sociology. 85, 1145–1179.Google Scholar
  21. Kohn, A. (1990).The Brighter Side of Human Nature. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  22. Leavitt, H. J. (1989). What we haven't taught our MBAs.California Management Review. Spring, 38–50.Google Scholar
  23. Lerner, M. (1965). Introduction. In A. Smith.An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. New York: The Modern Library.Google Scholar
  24. McLoughlin, M. (1987). A nation of liars?U.S. News and World Report. February 23, 54–60.Google Scholar
  25. Mead, G. H. (1934).Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Nicholson, W. (1989).Microeconomic Theory. Chicago: Dryden Press.Google Scholar
  27. Palmer, R. E. (1986). Let's be bullish on ethics.New York Times. June 20, 23.Google Scholar
  28. Porter, L. W. & McKibbin, L. E. (1988).Management Education and Development. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
  29. Rand, A. (1964). “Man's Rights.” Excerpt from theThe Virtue of Selfishness. New York: New American Library. Reprinted in McAdams, T. (1990).Law, Business and Society. 2nd ed. Homewood, IL: BPI/Irwin, 7–9.Google Scholar
  30. Raphael, D. D. (1985).Adam Smith. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Shad, J. S. R. (1987). Business's bottom line: Ethics.New York Times. July 27, 19.Google Scholar
  32. Shapiro, W. (1987). What's wrong.Time. May 25, 14–17.Google Scholar
  33. Smith, A. (1965).An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. New York: The Modern Library.Google Scholar
  34. Smith, A. (1976).The Theory of Moral Sentiments. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Steiner, G. A., and Steiner, J. F. (1991).Business, Government, and Society. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  36. Stone, I. F. (1988).The Trial of Socrates. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  37. Tawney, R. H. (1948).The Acquisitive Society. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers.Google Scholar
  38. Tuleja, T. (1985).Beyond the Bottom Line. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  39. Viner, J. (1928). Adam Smith and Laissez Faire. In John Maurice Clark, et al.,Adam Smith. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  40. Walker, B. (1981).Welfare Economics and Urban Problems. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  41. Wokutch, R. E. (1990). Corporate social responsibility Japanese style.Academy of Management Executive. 4, 56–74.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jon M. Shepard
    • 1
  • Jon Shepard
    • 2
  • Richard E. Wokutch
    • 1
  1. 1.Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Yale Law SchoolUSA

Personalised recommendations