Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A comparative analysis of the empirical validity of past- and present-oriented biographical items

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study sought to determine whether changing the time orientation or biodata items from past to present would result in a reduction of the items' validity. It was predicated on the notion that the traditionally employed measures of past performance were potentially unfair, especially to minority applicants. Administered to 192 members of the Air National Guard, the set of biodata items measuring present behavior was found to have validity coefficients which are at least comparable, if not superior, to the set measuring past behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asher, J. J. & Sciarrino, J. A. (1974). Realistic work sample tests: A review.Personnel Psychology, 27, 519–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • BNA Survey #124 (1976), Washington, D.C., September.

  • Cascio, W. F. (1976). Turnover, biographical data, and fair employment practice.Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 576–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cascio, W. F. (1982).Applied Psychology in personnel management. Reston, VA: Reston Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnette, M. D. & Borman, W. C. (1979). Personnel selection and classification systems.Annual Review of Psychology, 30, 477–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H. (1950)Childhood and society. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975).Belief, attitude, intention and behavior. Reading, MA: Addision-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frenkel-Brunswik, E. (1936) Studies in biographical psychology.Character and Personality, 5, 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, E. G. and Kleiman, L. A. (1988). Getting to know you.Personnel Administrator, 34 (5), 86–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honzik, M. P., Macfarlane, J. W., & Allen, L. (1948). The stability of mental test performance between two and eighteen years.Journal of Experimental Education, 17, 309–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, W. A. (1976). Biographical data. In M. D. Dunnette (ed.),Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago, Rand-McNally, 609–644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, R. & Chao, G. (1982). Validity and fairness of some alternative selection procedures on workforce productivity.Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 609–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., McKenzie, R. C. and Muldraw, T. W. (1979). Impact of valid selection procedures on work-force productivity.Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 609–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong, E. K. (1931).Change of interests with age. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, USA

    Lawrence S. Kleiman

  2. Kent State University, USA

    Robert H. Faley

Authors
  1. Lawrence S. Kleiman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert H. Faley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kleiman, L.S., Faley, R.H. A comparative analysis of the empirical validity of past- and present-oriented biographical items. J Bus Psychol 4, 431–437 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01013606

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01013606

Keywords

Search

Navigation