Skip to main content
Log in

Employee participation in decision-making: An analysis of the perceptions of members and nonmembers of quality circles

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study sought to assess the perceptions of members and non-members of quality circles with reference to their perceived degree of actual and desired participation in decision making. The sample comprised of 294 non-supervisory employees from three manufacturing plants. The results indicate that the actual amount of perceived participation differed very little between QC and non-QC employees. Only in work related decisions did QC members indicate that they had some say or influence. Outside of these decision areas neither group of employees expressed a strong desire to have more than “some say” on most policy-oriented decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bernstein, P. (1980).Workplace Democratization. New Brunswick, N.J. Transaction Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, G.R., and Wagner III, J.A., (1985) “Quality Circles in the United States: A Conceptual Reevaluation,”Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 21, 155–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, D., (1983) “Quality Circles in Context,”Industrial Commercial Training, 15, 80–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Industrial Democracy in Europe International Research Group (IDE). (1981).Industrial Democracy in Europe. London, Oxford.

  • Lawler E., III, and Mohram, S., (1985). “Quality Circles After the Fad,”Harvard Business Review, 65–71.

  • Locke, E.A., and Schweiger, D.M. (1979). “Participation in Decision-Making: One More Look.” In Barry Staw and L.L. Cummings (Eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior, 1, Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowin, A. (1968). Participative Decision-Making: A Model, Literature Critique, and Prescriptions for Research,Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 3, 68–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, M., (1986) “The Question of Quality Circles,”Psychology Today, 20, 36–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, M.,; Mirvis, P.; Hackett, E. and Grady, J., Jr., (1986). “Employee Participation in a Quality Circle Program: Impact on Quality of Work Life, Productivity, and Absenteeism,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 61–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, G.W. and Stott, R.G. (1985). “Quality Circles: Panacea or Pandora's Box?Organizational Dynamics, 13 (4), 34–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohrman, S.A., and Ledford, G., Jr., (1985) “The Design and Use of Effective Employee Participation Groups: Implications for Human Resource Management,Human Resource Management, 24, 413–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafaeli, A. (1985). Quality Circles and Employee Attitudes.Personnel Psychology, 38, 603–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea, G.P., (1986) “Quality Circles: The Danger of Bottled Change,Sloan Management Review, Vol 33–46.

  • Wagner, J.A., and Gooding, R.Z., (1987). “Shared Influence and Organizational Behavior: A Meta-analysis of Situational Variables Expected to Moderate Participation-Outcomes Relationships,”Academy of Management Journal, 30, 524–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeager, E., (1979) “Examining the Quality Control Circle,”Personnel Journal, 58, 682–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zemke, R., (1980) “Honeywell Imports Quality Circles as Long-Term Management Strategy,”Training, 17.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liverpool, P.R. Employee participation in decision-making: An analysis of the perceptions of members and nonmembers of quality circles. J Bus Psychol 4, 411–422 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01013604

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01013604

Keywords

Navigation