Skip to main content
Log in

Propaganda substances in the cuckoo antLeptothorax kutteri and the slave-makerHarpagoxenus sublaevis

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reports the first discovery of “propaganda substances” in a workerless inquiline ant, the European myrmicineLeptothorax kutteri Buschinger. These substances are used by the parasite queen as a chemical weapon for defense against hostile workers of the host speciesL. acervorum. The substances also have an unusual behavioral effect: they cause host workers to attack each other, and they therefore appear to override nestmate recognition in host colonies. Laboratory experiments show that the source of these substances is the Dufour's gland of theL. kutteri queen. Our experiments also confirm the hypothesis that the closely related slave-making antHarpagoxenus sublaevis uses its Dufour's gland secretions as a chemical weapon during slave raids and colony foundation. The behavioral effect of these slave-maker secretions is identical to that ofL. kutteri queens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alloway, T. 1979. Raiding behavior of two species of slave-making ants,Harpagoxenus americanus (Emery) andLeptothorax duloticus (Wesson) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).Anim. Behav. 27:202–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W.L. 1955. The first social parasite in the ant tribe Dacetini.Insectes Soc. 2:181–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buschinger, A. 1965.Leptothorax (Mychothorax) kutteri n.sp., eine sozial-parasitische Ameise (Hymenoptera, Formicidae).Insectes Soc. 12:327–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buschinger, A. 1974a. Experimente und Beobachtung zur Gründung und Entwicklung neuer Societäten der sklavenhaltenden AmeiseHarpagoxenus sublaevis (Nyl).Insectes Soc. 21:381–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buschinger, A. 1974b. Zur Biologie der sozialparasitischen AmeiseLeptothorax goesswaldi Kutter (Hym., Formicidae).Insectes Soc. 21:133–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buschinger, A. 1981. Biological and systematic relationships of social parasitic Leptothoracini from Europe and North America, pp. 211–222,in P.E. Howse, J.L, Clément (eds.). Bio-systematics of Social Insects. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buschinger, A., Ehrhardt, W., andWinter, U. 1980. The organization of slave raids in dulotic ants—a comparative study (Hymenoptera; Formicidae).Z. Tierpsychol. 53:245–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douwes, P., andBuschinger, A. 1983. Två för Nordeuropa nya myror.Entomol. Tidskr. 104:1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumpert, K. 1981. The Social Biology of Ants. Translated by C. Johnson. Pitman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gösswald, K. 1953. Histologische Untersuchungen an der arbeiterlosen AmeiseTeleutomyrmex schneideri Kutter (Hym. Formicidae).Mitt. Schweiz. Entomol. Ges. 26:81–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gösswald, K. 1954. Unsere Ameisen. Kosmos, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler, B. 1970. Zur Physiologie der Gast-Wirt-Beziehungen (Myrmecophilie) bei Ameisen. II. Das Gastverhältnis des imaginalenAtemeles pubicollis Bris. (Col, Staphylinidae) zuMyrmica undFormica (Hym. Formicidae). Z.Vergl. Physiol. 66:176–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler, B. 1971. Communication between ants and their guests.Sci. Am. 224(3):86–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kistner, D.H. 1979. Social and evolutionary significance of social insect symbionts, pp. 339–413,in H.R. Hermann (ed.). Social Insects, Vol. I. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutter, H. 1969. Die sozialparasitischen Ameisen der Schweiz.Neujahrsblatt hrsg. von der Naturf. Ges. Zurich 171:1–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passera, L. 1964. Données biologiques sur la fourmi parasitePlagiolepis xene Starcke.Insectes Soc. 11:59–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regnier, F.E., andWilson, E.O. 1971. Chemical communication and “propaganda” in slave-maker ants.Science 172:267–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rissing, S.W. 1983. Natural history of the workerless inquiline antPogonomyrmex colei (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).Psyche 90:321–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stumper, R. 1950. Les associations complexes des fourmis. Commensalisme, symbiose et parasitisme.Bull. Biol. Fr. Belg. 84:376–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vander Meer, R., Wojcik, D. 1982. Chemical mimicry in the myrmecophilous beetleMyrmecaphodius excavaticollis.Science 218:806–808.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, W.M. 1910. Ants: Their Structure, Development and Behavior. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.O. 1971. The Insect Societies. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, U. 1979. Untersuchungen zum Raubzugverhalten der dulotischen AmeiseHarpagoxenus sublaevis (Nyl).Insectes Soc. 26:123–135.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Allies, A.B., Bourke, A.F.G. & Franks, N.R. Propaganda substances in the cuckoo antLeptothorax kutteri and the slave-makerHarpagoxenus sublaevis . J Chem Ecol 12, 1285–1293 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01012348

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01012348

Key Words

Navigation