Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of the effects of two sources of hyaluronidase on tissue sections using visual estimates and microdensitometric measurements

  • Papers
  • Published:
The Histochemical Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Synopsis

Comparison of two hyaluronidase preparations showed no difference to exist between them in their action on various tissue components. The enzyme can be stored in buffer for 3 weeks at 5°C without loss of potency. There was a good correlation between visual estimates of staining and microdensitometric measurements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Leppi, T. J. &Stoward, P. J. (1965) On the use of testicular hyaluronidase for identification of acid mucopolysaccharides in tissue sections.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 13, 406–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, R. V. &Margolis, R. K. (1970). Ribonuclease and desoxyribonuclease activity in hyaluronidase preparations.Analyt. Biochem. 35, 77–82.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Butler, W.F., Pousty, I. Comparison of the effects of two sources of hyaluronidase on tissue sections using visual estimates and microdensitometric measurements. Histochem J 6, 117–120 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01011800

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01011800

Keywords

Navigation