Advertisement

Journal of Statistical Physics

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 111–126 | Cite as

On intrinsic randomness of dynamical systems

  • S. Goldstein
  • B. Misra
  • M. Courbage
Articles

Abstract

We discuss the problem of nonunitary equivalence, via positivity-preserving similarity transformations, between the unitary groups associated with deterministic dynamical evolution and semigroups associated with stochastic processes. Dynamical systems admitting such nonunitary equivalence with stochastic Markov processes are said to beintrinsically random. In a previous work, it was found that the so-called Bernoulli systems (discrete time) are intrinsically random in this sense. This result is extended here by showing that a more general class of dynamical systems—the so-calledK systems andK flows—are intrinsically random. The connection of intrinsic randomness with local instability of motion is briefly discussed. We also show that Markov processes associated through nonunitary equivalence tononisomorphic K flows are necessarily non-isomorphic.

Key words

Dynamical systems Markov processes K flows H theorem time operator irreversibility instability 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    B. Misra, I. Prigogine, and M. Courbage,Physica (Utrecht) 98A:1–26 (1979); see also an earlier shorter version inProc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76:3607–3611 (1979).ADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    I. Prigogine, C. George, F. Hennin, and L. Rosenfeld,Chem. Scr. 4:5–32 (1973).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Y. G. Sinai,Funct. Anal. Appl. 6:35 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Aizenman, S. Goldstein, and J. L. Lebowitz,Commun. Math. Phys. 39:289–301 (1975).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Y. G. Sinai,Usp. Mat. Nauk 27:137 (1972).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. Gallavotti and D. Ornstein,Commun. Math. Phys. 38:83–101 (1974).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Y. G. Sinai,Sov. Math. Dokl. 4:1818–1822 (1963).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. Anosov,Proc. Steklov Inst. No. 90 (1967).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. Ornstein,Ergodic Theory, Randomness and Dynamical Systems (Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, 1974).MATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    B. Misra,Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 75:1627–1631 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    K. Goodrich, K. Gustafson, and B. Misra, On a converse to Koopman's lemma,Physica (Utrecht) 102A:379–388 (1980).ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    E. B. Dynkin,Markov Processes (Springer, New York, 1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    V. I. Arnold and A. Avez,Ergodic Problems of Classical Mechanics (Benjamin, New York, 1968).MATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Courbage, C. Coutsomitros, and B. Misra, On the isomorphisms of Markov processes associated with Bernoulli systems, submitted toAnn. Inst. Henri Poincaré.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    B. Simon,The P(φ) 2 Euclidean (Quantum) Fluid Theory (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1974), proof of Theorem I.13.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. Courbage and B. Misra, On the equivalence between Bernoulli dynamical systems and stochastic Markov processes, to appear inPhysica.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Goldstein
    • 1
  • B. Misra
    • 2
  • M. Courbage
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of MathematicsRutgers UniversityNew Brunswick
  2. 2.Faculté des SciencesUniversité Libre de BruxellesBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations