Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Errors in microdensitometry

  • Review
  • Published:
The Histochemical Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Microdensitometric errors can originate in the instrument, in the specimen or in the human operator. Instrumental sources of systematic error mostly reduce the apparent integrated absorbance, especially of relatively small and highly absorbing objects. They can be assessed, minimized or eliminated by available techniques, but with modern apparatus are in general important only if results of high accuracy are required. Instrument errors include: (a) distributional error, due to the use of too large a measuring spot or the specimen being out of focus; (b) glare (stray light), due mainly to multiple reflections in the microscope objective; (c) monochromator error (the use of insufficiently pure light); (d) calibration errors; and (e) errors resulting from lack of photometric linearity, or the specimen absorbance exceeding the measuring range of the instrument.

Specimen errors, including problems of stain specificity and stoichiometry, are now the most important obstacles to a wider use of microdensitometry in histochemistry. The following selected topics are briefly discussed: fading; rate of staining; Beer's law deviations and the microdensitometry of opaque particles.

Human errors include faulty logic, and failing to attempt an investigation because of anticipated difficulties which are in fact exaggerated or imaginary. The significance of microdensitometric results should, in general, be assessed by biological criteria rather than merely statistically; the use is urged of appropriate internal biological controls and standards wherever possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bachmann, K. (1970) Specific nuclear DNA amounts in toads of the genusBufo.Chromosoma 29, 365–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedi, K. S. &Goldstein, D. J. (1976) Apparent anomalies in nuclear Feulgen-DNA content.J. Cell Biol. 71, 68–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedi, K. S. &Goldstein, D. J. (1978) Microdensitometric and autoradiographic comparison of the DNA contents of foetal and adult rat liver nuclei.Histochemistry 55, 63–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blout, E. R., Bird, G. R. &Grey, D. S. (1950) Infra-red microspectroscopy.J. opt. Soc. Am. 40, 304–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, W. F. &Pousty, I. (1974) Comparison of the effects of two sources of hyaluronidase on tissue sections using visual estimates and microdensitometric measurements.Histochem. J. 6, 117–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Changaris, D. G., Schengrund, S.-L. &Combs, J. S. (1978). Microfluorimetry of brain glycolipid. Theoretical and applied analysis of PAS fluorescence and dye concentration.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 26, 267–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chayen, J., Bitensky, L., Johnstone, J. J., Gooding, P. E. &Slater, T. F. (1979) The application of microspectrophotometry to the measurement of cytochrome P-450. InQuantitative Cytochemistry and its Applications (edited byPattison, J. R., Bitensky, L. andChayen, J.), pp. 129–137. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chayen, J., Chayen, R., Besser, G. M. &Bitensky, L. (1976). The cytochemical bioassay of hormones.Rec. Prog. Horm. Res. 32, 33–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, W. J. &Williams, M. A. (1963). Cellular infiltration in homotransplanted kidneys.Br. Med. J. 1, 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Tonkelaar, E. M. &Van Duijn, P. (1964) Photographic colorimetry as a quantitative cytochemical method. I. Principles and practice of the method.Histochemie 4, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Tonkelaar, E. M. &Van Duijn, P. (1964). Photographic colorimetry as a quantitative cytochemical method. II. Determination of relative amounts of DNA in cell nuclei.Histochemie 4, 10–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Tonkelaar, E. M. &Van Duijn, P. (1964) Photographic colorimetry as a quantitative cytochemical method. III. Determination of the absolute amount of DNA in cell nuclei.Histochemie 4, 16–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewse, C. D. &Potter, C. G. (1975) Influence of light and mounting medium on the fading of Feulgen stain.Stain Technol. 50, 301–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörmer, P. &Brinkman, W. (1968) Silberkornzählung mit dem Auflicht-Mikroskopphotometer. Ein Beitrag zur quantitativen Autoradiographie.Acta Histochem. Suppl.8, 163–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duijndam, W. A. L., Smeulders, A. W. M., Van Duijn, P. &Verweij, A. C. (1980a) Optical errors in scanning stage absorbance cytophotometry. I. Procedures for correcting apparent integrated absorbance values for distributional, glare, and diffraction errors.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 28, 388–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duijndam, W. A. L., Van Duijn, P. &Riddersma, S. H. (1980b) Optical errors in scanning stage absorbance cytophotometry. II. Application of correction factors for residual distributional error, glare and diffraction error in practical cytophotometry.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 28, 395–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, A. M. &Iorio, R. (1966) Potential sources of error in two-wavelength cytophotometry. InIntroduction to Quantitative Cytochemistry (edited byWied, G. L.) pp. 215–237 New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, D. J. (1970) Aspects of scanning microdensitometry. I. Stray light (glare).J. Microsc. 92, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, D. J. (1971) Aspects of scanning microdensitometry. II. Spot size, focus and resolution.J. Microsc. 93, 14–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, D. J. (1973). Scanning microspectrophotometry. InThe Encyclopaedia of Microscopy and Microtechnique (edited byGray, P.), pp. 531–535 New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, D. J. (1975) Aspects of scanning microdensitometry. III. The monochromator system.J. Microsc. 105, 33–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, D. J. (1980) A microdensitometric method for the analysis of staining kinetics.J. Microsc. 119, 331–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, D. J. &Williams, M. A. (1971) Quantitative autoradiography: an evaluation of visual grain counting, reflectance microscopy, gross absorbance measurements and flying-spot microdensitometry.J. Microsc. 94, 215–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiskey, C. F. (1955) Absorption spectroscopy. InPhysical Techniques in Biological Research (edited byOster, G. andPollister, A. W.), Vol. 1. pp. 73–130. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, R. D. (1979) The measurement of intracellular haemoglobin. InQuantitative Cytochemistry and Its Applications (edited byPattison, J. R., Bitensky, L. andChayen, J.), pp. 139–147, London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, V. &Goldstein, D. J. (1974) Haemoglobin content of individual erythrocytes in normal and abnormal blood.Br. J. Haemat. 28, 89–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. W., Clabaugh, W. A. &Hawkins, H. K. (1964) Photographic cytophotometry with a dual microscope. II. Microscope assembly and film dye extractions.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 12, 600–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, K. W. &Metcalf, W. K. (1959) An experimental evaluation of microspectrophotometry.Physics Med. Biol. 4, 43–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krug, H. (1962) Grundlagen und Methodik der photographischen Mikrospektrophotometrie.Acta histochem. 14, 42–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leuchtenberger, C. (1958) Quantitative determination of DNA in cells by Feulgen microspectrophotometry. InGeneral Cytochemical Methods (edited byDanielli, J. F.), Vol. 1. pp. 219–278. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodin, Z., Pilny, J., Novakova, V., Hartman, J. &Med, F. (1965) Experimentelle Feststellung von Fehlern in der Zytophotometrie.Acta histochem. Suppl.6, 215–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, N. G. (1974) Nuclear DNA content of the emu.Chromosoma 47, 71–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayall, B. H. &Mendelsohn, M. L. (1970a) Errors in absorption cytophotometry: some theoretical and practical considerations. InIntroduction to Quantitative Cytochemistry (edited byWied, G. L. andBahr, G. F.) Vol. II, pp. 171–197 New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayall, B. H. &Mendelsohn, M. L. (1970b) Deoxyribonucleic acid cytophotometry of stained human leukocytes. II. The mechanical scanner of CYDAC, the theory of scanning photometry and the magnitude of residual errors.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 18, 383–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mello, M. L. S. (1978) Feulgen-DNA absorption spectrum of euchromatin and constitutive heterochromatin.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 26, 1082–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendelsohn, M. L. (1966) Absorption cytophotometry: comparative methodology for heterogenous objects, and the two-wavelength method. InIntroduction to Quantitative Cytochemistry (edited byWied, G. L.), pp. 202–214. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. P. (1977) Choosing materials for photographic colorimetry of sectioned tissue.Histochem. J. 9, 767–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, D. (1966) Erfahrungen mit der Feulgenfarbung für quantitative cytochemische DNS-Untersuchungen.Histochemie 7, 96–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naora, H. (1951). Microspectrophotometry and cytochemical analysis of nucleic acids.Science, N. Y. 114, 279–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Needham, J. (1934)A History of Embryology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemi, M. (1958) Cytophotometry by silver analysis of photomicrographs.Acta Anat. Suppl.34, 1–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nöhammer, G. (1978) Die cytospektrometrische Proteinbestimmung mit der Tetrazonium-Kupplungsreaktion. I. Optimierung der Färbemethode.Acta histochem. 61, 317–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornstein, L. (1952) The distributional error in microspectrophotometry.Lab. Invest. 1, 250–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollister, A. W. &Ornstein, L. (1959) The photometric chemical analysis of cells. InAnalytical Cytology (edited byMellors, R. C.), pp. 431–518. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasch, E. M., Barr, H. J. &Rasch, R. W. (1971) The DNA content of sperm ofDrosophila melanogaster.Chromosoma 33, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenquist, T. H. (1976). On the use of quantitation in histochemistry: a review of the literature.Histochem. J. 8, 205–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandritter, W. (1960) Über Einschlossmedien für die Photometrie im sichtbaren und ultraviolletten Light.Acta histochem.9, 192–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholtz, C. L. (1977) Quantitative histochemistry of myelin using Luxon Fast Blue MBS.Histochem. J. 9, 759–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. F. (1952) Problems of scattering and spectral anomalies in microabsorption spectrophotometry.Lab. Invest. 1, 73–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stere, A. J., Brister, N. W. &Anthony, A. (1978) Cytophotometric analyses of myocardial RNA in rat exposed to altitude hypoxia.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 26, 459–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swartz, F. J. &Nagy, E. R. (1962) Feulgen stain stability in relation to three mounting media and exposure to light.Stain Technol. 38, 179–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift, H. H. (1955) Cytochemical techniques for nucleic acids InThe Nucleic Acids (edited byChargaff, E. andDavidson, J. N.), Vol. 11, pp. 51–92 New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift, H.H &Rasch, E. (1956) Microphotometry with visible light. InPhysical Techniques in Biological Research (editedOster, G. andPollister, A. W.), pp. 354–400, New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uber F. M. (1939) Ultra-violet spectrophotometry ofZea mays pollen with the quartz microscope.Am. J. Botany 26, 799–807.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vahs, W. (1973) Problematik der Feulgen-Cytophotometrie (DNS) an Schnittpräparaten.Micr. Acta 74, 36–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Oostveldt, P. (1975) Eine Korrektur fur den Schwarzschild-Villiger-Effekt bei Messungen mit dem UV-Mikroskopphotometer UVMP von Leitz.Leitz-Mitt. Wiss. Techn. 6, 192–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, P. M. B. (1956) Ultraviolet absorption techniques. InPhysical Techniques in Biological Research (edited byOster, G. andPollister, A. W.) Vol. 3, pp. 402–487. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, P. M. B. (1958) Ultraviolet microspectrophotometry. InGeneral Cytochemical Methods (edited byDanielli, J. F.), Vol 1 pp 163–217. New York:, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, P. M. B. &Richards, B. M. (1957) A method for investigating the stoichiometry of Feulgen stain.Expl Cell Res Supp.4, 97–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, W. (1955) Images of incoherently illuminated bright and opaque disks.J. opt. Soc. Am. 45, 1006–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Würthner, K., Sachs, H. &Bahnsen, J. (1972) Zum Problem der Kernanschnitte bei der Zytophotometrie an histologischen Präparaten.Histochemie 32, 261–70.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Human Biology and Anatomy, The University of Sheffield, UK

    D. J. Goldstein

Authors
  1. D. J. Goldstein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goldstein, D.J. Errors in microdensitometry. Histochem J 13, 251–267 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01006883

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01006883

Keywords

Search

Navigation