Skip to main content
Log in

Turning points in the INF negotiations

  • Case Analyses
  • Published:
Negotiation Journal

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Druckman, D. (1971). “The influence of the situation in interparty conflict.”Journal of Conflict Resolution 25: 523–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— (1986). “Stages, turning points, and crises: Negotiating military base rights, Spain and the United States.”Journal of Conflict Resolution 30: 327–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— (1990). “Three cases of base-rights negotiations: Lessons learned.” InU.S. Bases Overseas, edited by J. W. McDonald, Jr. and D. B. Bendahmane. Boulder, Colo.: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Druckman, D., andBroome, B. J. (1991). “Value differences and conflict resolution: Familiarity or liking?”Journal of Conflict Resolution, in press.

  • Druckman, D., andHopmann, P. T. (1989). “Behavioral aspects of negotiations on mutual security.” InBehavior, Society and Nuclear War, edited by P. E. Tetlock, et al. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Druckman, D., Zechmeister, K., andSolomon, D. (1972). “Determinants of bargaining behavior in a bilateral monopoly situation: Opponent's concession rate and relative defensibility.”Behavioral Science 17: 514–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1968). “Social-psychological aspects of international relations.” InHandbook of Social Psychology, edited by G. Lindzey and E. Aronson, Vol. 5. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frye, A. (1974). “U.S. decision making for SALT.” InSALT: The Moscow agreements and beyond, edited by M. Willrich and J. B. Rhinelander. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R. C. (1986). “The internal dynamics of U.S. nuclear arms control policymaking.” Part V ofFundamentals of Nuclear Arms Control. Report prepared by the Congressional Research Service for the Subcommittee on Arms Control, International Security, and Science, Committee on Foreign Affairs, U.S. House of Representatives.

  • Iklé, F. C. (1964).How nations negotiate. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindskold, S., Betz, B., Walters, D. S. (1986). “Transforming competitive or cooperative climates.”Journal of Conflict Resolution 30: 99–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • London, M. (1988).Developing managers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neidle, A. F. (1982). Nuclear negotiations: Reassessing arms control goals in U.S.-Soviet relations. Austin, Tex.: Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R., andRoss, L. (1980).Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, L. (1989). “Practical negotiating lessons from INF.”The Washington Quarterly (Spring): 71–81.

  • Rose, W. M. (1988).U.S. unilateral arms control initiatives: When do they work? Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlin, B. W. (1989). “The stages of prenegotiation: The decision to negotiate North American free trade.” InGetting to the Table, edited by J. G. Stein. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weihmiller, G. R. (1987). “U.S.-Soviet summitry: Lessons learned.” InU.S.-Soviet Summitry: Roosevelt through Carter, edited by J. W. McDonald, Jr. Washington, D.C.: Foreign Service Institute, U.S. Department of State.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. R. (1989). “The politics of international regime formation: Managing natural resources and the environment.”International Organization 43: 349–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Daniel Druckman is a principal study director at the National Academy of Sciences, 2101 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20418. He is Adjunct Professor of Conflict Management at George Mason University in Fairfax, Va.Jo L. Husbands is a senior research associate at the National Academy of Sciences.Karin Johnston is a graduate student in the Department of Government and Politics at the University of Maryland.

About this article

Cite this article

Druckman, D., Husbands, J.L. & Johnston, K. Turning points in the INF negotiations. Negot J 7, 55–67 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01004937

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01004937

Keywords

Navigation