Plant Systematics and Evolution

, Volume 136, Issue 3–4, pp 233–246 | Cite as

The significance of life-form characters for systematics, with special reference to the familyCampanulaceae

  • Tatjana V. Shulkina
Article

Abstract

The biomorphological radiation of theCampanulaceae is outlined. Certain aspects of ontogeny and life-form are specific and constant for the tribes and genera of the family, and for the sections, subsections and series ofCampanula. Therefore, a certain correlation exists between the biomorphological characters and the reproductive structures underlying the taxonomic system.

Key words

CampanulaceaeJuss. s. str. Campanula L. Ontogenesis life-forms relation with taxonomy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Böcher, T. W., 1977: Convergence as an evolutionary process. — Journ. Linn. Soc. (Bot.)75, 1–19.Google Scholar
  2. Boissier, E., 1875: In Flora Orientalis3, 884–962. — Genevae et Basileae: H. Georg.Google Scholar
  3. De Candolle, A., 1830: Monographie des Campanulées, 1–385. — Paris. V. Desray.Google Scholar
  4. Diels, L., 1918: Das Verhältnis der Rhythmik und Verbreitung bei den Perennen des europäischen Sommerwaldes. — Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.36, 236–250.Google Scholar
  5. Fedorov, A., 1957:Campanulaceae Juss. — InKomarov, V. L., (Ed.): Flora SSSR24, 126–453. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
  6. Fedorov, A., 1978:Campanulaceae Juss. — In Flora partis europaeae URSS3, 213–238. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
  7. —, 1975:Campanula L. — InTutin, T. O., & al. (Eds.): Flora Europaea4, 74–92. — Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Gadella, Th. W. J., 1964: Cytotaxonomic studies in the genusCampanula. — Wentia11, 1–104.Google Scholar
  9. Raunkiaer, C., 1937: Plant life-forms. — Oxford: Clarendon press.Google Scholar
  10. Shönland, S., 1889–1894:Campanulaceae. — InEngler, A., Prantl, K.: Natürl. Pflanzenfam.4/5, 40–63. Leipzig: W. Engelmann.Google Scholar
  11. Serebrjakov, J. G., 1962: Ecological plant morphology. — Moscow: Vysšia Škola.Google Scholar
  12. Sinnot, E. W., Bailey, J. W., 1914: The origin and dispersal of herbaceous Angiosperms. — Ann. Bot.28, 547–600.Google Scholar
  13. Shulkina, T. V., 1977: Types of life-forms and their importance for the taxonomy ofCampanula L. — Bot. Ž.62, 1102–1113.Google Scholar
  14. —, 1978: Life-forms inCampanulaceae Juss., their geographical distribution and connection with taxonomy. — Bot. Ž.63, 153–169.Google Scholar
  15. —, 1979: De positione systematicaCampanula lactiflora Bieb. — Nov. Syst. Plant. Vasc.16, 175–178.Google Scholar
  16. —, 1978: Chromosome numbers and biological peculiarities of some species ofCampanula L. — Bot. Ž.63, 1444–1449.Google Scholar
  17. Takhtajan, A., 1966: Systema et phylogeniaMagnoliophytorum. — Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
  18. Vavilov, N. I., 1920: Zakon gomologičeskih rjadov v nasledstvennoj izmenčivosti. — Saratov: Gubpoligrafotdel.Google Scholar
  19. —, 1922: The law of homologous series in variation. — J. Genet.12, 47–89.Google Scholar
  20. —, 1935: Zakon gomologičeskih rjadov v nasledstvennoj izmenčivosti. — InVavilov, N. I., (Ed.): Teoretičeskie osnovy selekcii rastenij (The Theoretical Basis of Plant Selection)1, 1–60. Revised and enlarged edition. — Moskva, Leningrad: Sel'hozgiz.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tatjana V. Shulkina
    • 1
  1. 1.Komarov Botanical InstituteLeningradUSSR

Personalised recommendations