Skip to main content
Log in

Sero-systematics ofCytisus sect.Trianthocytisus (Fabaceae)

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The serological reaction of seed proteins provides evidence for a partly new systematic arrangement ofCytisus sect.Trianthocytisus and ofCytisus s.l. Proposed modifications agree with recent advances in morphological taxonomy. Sect.Trianthocytisus includes only two species,C. villosus andC. aeolicus. Its position is central within the genus, and this fact agrees with the proposed retypification ofCytisus (type species:C. villosus).C. emeriflorus, formerly included in the same section, constitutes the monospecific sect.Emeroides, which is intermediate towards the genusLembotropis. This is serologically isolated and includes onlyL. nigricans. It is confirmed thatC. sessilifolius should be removed from the genusCytisus as a monospecific genus:Cytisophyllum Lang which is closely allied toHesperolaburnum and toPodocytisus, the most primitive genera ofGenisteae.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ascherson, P., Graebner, P., 1907: Synopsis der Mitteleuropäischen Flora.6 (2). — Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisby, F. A., Nicholls, K. W., 1977: Effects of varying character definitions on classification ofGenisteae (Leguminosae). — Bot. Journ. Linn. Soc.74, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briquet, J., 1894: Etudes sur les Cytises des Alpes Maritimes. — Genève et Bâle: Georg & C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cristofolini, G., Chiapella, L., 1970: Chemotassonomia del genereSalicornia delle coste venete. — Giorn. Bot. Ital.104, 91–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, —, 1975: Sistematica sierologica delleGenisteae. — Giorn. Bot. Ital.109, 292–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, —, 1977: Serological systematics of the tribeGenisteae (Fabaceae). — Taxon26, 43–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frodin, D. G., 1965: Generic and sectional limits inCytisus L. s. l. — M. Sc. Thesis, University of Liverpool.

  • —, 1968:Cytisus L. — InTutin, T. G. & al. (Eds.): Flora Europaea2, 86–90. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grisebach, A. H. R., 1843: Spicilegium Florae Rumelicae1, 1–10. — Braunschweig: Vieweg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holubová-Klásková, A., 1964: Bemerkungen zur Gliederung der GattungCytisus L. s.l. — Acta Carol. Praha, Biol., suppl. 1964/2, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, C., 1869: Dendrologie,1, 15–45. — Erlangen: Enke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouchterlony, O., 1968: Handbook of Immunodiffusion and Immunoelectrophoresis. — Ann Arbor: Ann Arbor Sciences Publ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrin, F., 1908: Recherches anatomiques sur la classification des Genêts et des Cytises. — Ann. Sci. Nat., sér. 9,7, 129–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polhill, R. M., 1976:Genisteae (Adans.)Benth. and related tribes (Leguminosae). — Bot. Systematics1, 143–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • — & al., 1978: Proposal to conserve and retypify the nameCytisus (Leguminosae). — Taxon27, 556–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothmaler, W., 1944: Die Gliederung der GattungCytisus L. — Feddes Repert.53, 137–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seal, H., 1964: Multivariate statistical analysis for biologists. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chiapella, L.F., Cristofolini, G. Sero-systematics ofCytisus sect.Trianthocytisus (Fabaceae). Pl Syst Evol 136, 209–216 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01004626

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01004626

Key words

Navigation