Skip to main content
Log in

Qualitative immediacy and the communicative act

  • Published:
Qualitative Sociology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

“Qualitative immediacy” (also termed “quality” in its philosophical sense and “esthetic quality”) is of fundamental importance within the pragmatic conception of meaning as interpretive act, and yet it has been virtually ignored by social scientists. The concept is traced through its foundations in Peirce's philosophy, its development in Dewey's theory of esthetic experience, and its relation to the general pragmatic conception of the self. The importance of the “I” in Mead's view of the self is seen as similar to Firstness in Peirce and esthetic experience in Dewey. Those turning to qualitative approaches ought to consider qualitative immediacy as a genuine addition to our understanding of human communication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • 1967 John Dewey. New York: Washington Square Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1971 Praxis and Action. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1976 The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. 1967 “Society as symbolic interaction.” P. 141 in Jerome G. Manis and Bernard N. Meltzer (eds.), Symbolic Interaction. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. and E. Rochberg-Halton 1981 The Meaning of Things: Domestic Symbols and the Self. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1916 Essays in Experimental Logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1925 Experience and Nature. Chicago: Open Court Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1938 Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. New York: Henry Holt and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1939 Theory of Valuation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1946 Problems of Men. New York: Philosophical Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1958 (1934) Art as Experience. New York: Capricorn Books, G.P. Putnam's Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1973 The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1980 “Blurred genes: The refiguration of social thought.” American Scholar 49 (Spring): 165–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonos, G. 1977 “‘Situation’ versus ‘frame’: The ‘interactionist’ and the ‘structuralist’ analyses of everyday life.” American Sociological Review 42 (December):854–867.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. 1973 Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology. Translated by Dorian Cairns. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, William 1950 Principles of Psychology. New York: Dover Publications, Inc. (1890).

    Google Scholar 

  • 1976 “The classic American pragmatists as forerunners to symbolic interactionism.” The Sociological Quarterly 17: 347–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1979 “A social behaviorist interpretation of the Median ‘I’.” American Journal of Sociology 85: 261–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, John 1959 An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, vol. 1 New York: Dover Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1932 The Philosophy of the Present. Arthur E. Murphy (ed.), with prefatory remarks by John Dewey. LaSalle, Ill.: The Open Court Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1934 Mind, Self, and Society. Charles Morris (ed.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • 1938 The Philosophy of the Act. Charles Morris (ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. 1962 Phenomenology of Perception. Translated by Colin Smith. New York: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, M.J. 1980 “James Mark Baldwin and the aesthetic development of the individual.” The Journal of Aesthetic Education 14: 31–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, Charles S. 1931–1958 The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vols, 1–6, C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss (eds.); vols. 7–8, A. Burks (ed.). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1979a “The meaning of personal arts objects” in J. Zuzanek (ed.), Social Research and Cultural Policy. Ontario: Otium Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochberg-Halton, Eugene 1979b Cultural Signs and Urban Adaptation: The Meaning of Cherished Household Possessions. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Chicago.

  • Rochberg-Halton, Eugene 1982 “Situation, structure, and the context of meaning.” The Sociological Quarterly 23:(in press).

  • Rosensohn, W.L. 1974 The Phenomenology of Charles S. Peirce. Amsterdam: B.R. Grüner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A. 1970 On Phenomenology and Social Relations. Edited and introduced by Helmut R. Wagner. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M.B. 1978 “Perspectives on selfhood.” American Psychologist 33 (December): 1053–1063.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1967 The Forest of Symbols. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1975 Revelation and Divination in Ndembu Ritual. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I am grateful for helpful comments from Milton Singer, Kevin McMurtrey, Benjamin Lee, and Thomas Buckley, and for an opportunity to discuss this paper in the seminar on dialogue at the Center for Psychosocial Studies, Chicago. A postdoctoral fellowship (T32 MH 14668) at the Institute for Psychosomatic and Psychiatric Research and Training, Michael Reese Hospital and Medical Center, and the University of Chicago, provided time for the writing of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rochberg-Halton, E. Qualitative immediacy and the communicative act. Qual Sociol 5, 162–181 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01003527

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01003527

Keywords

Navigation