Skip to main content
Log in

A numerical procedure for choosing effective, low toxicity plasticizers for glycol methacrylate embedding

  • Papers
  • Published:
The Histochemical Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A numerical method for selecting low toxicity plasticizers for glycol methacrylate (GMA) embedding mixtures is described. It involves use of various numerical parameters, namely; molecular weight, melting point, solubility parameter, and toxicity data. On the basis of these parameters, nine plasticizers were selected. Their effects on microtomy and tissue processing, and also their influence on tissue morphology and staining, were investigated. For tissue processed at low temperatures into GMA, using ethanol dehydration, the following compounds were as satisfactory as 2-butoxyethanol whilst being less toxic: 2-isopropoxyethanol, 2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethanol, 2-(2-ethoxyethoxy)ethanol, 2-(n-butoxyethoxy)ethanol. However for tissues processed using the plasticizer as dehydrating agent, the optimum plasticizers were 2-isopropoxyethanol, 2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethanol and 2-(2-ethoxyethoxy)ethanol. It is possible to give a numerical specification of the preferred plasticizers, and for the first procedure this is: a solubility parameter in the range 21–26 J0.5 cm−1.5 or higher, a melting point well below 0°C, and a rat oral LD50>12.52 mmol kg−1. It was also possible to analyse the differential effects of the dehydrating agents on histochemical and enzyme histochemical staining on a numerical basis, using a structure-activity relations approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bancroft, J. D. &Stevens, A. (1982).Theory and practice of histological techniques. 2nd edn. Edinburgh, London, Melbourne, New York: Churchill Livingstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barka, T. &Anderson, P. J. (1963).Histochemistry, Theory, Practice and Bibliography. Hoeber Medical Division New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burstone, M. S. (1962)Enzyme histochemistry and its application in the study of neoplasm. New York, London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chappard, D., Palle, S., Alexandre, C., Vico, L. &Riffat, G. (1987) Bone embedding in pure methyl methacrylate at low temperature preserves enzyme activities.Acta Histochem. 81, 183–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedors, R. F. (1974) A method for estimating both the solubility parameters and molar volumes of liquids.Polymer Eng. Sci. 14, 147–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frater, R. (1981) Neutralization of acid in glycol methacrylate and the use of cyclohexanol as a plasticizer.Stain Technol. 56, 99–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gächter, R. &Müller, H. (1985)Plastics additives handbook: stabilizers, processing aids, plasticizers, reinforcements, colorants for thermoplastics. 2nd edn. Munich, Vienna, New York: Hanser Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerrits, P. O., &Van Leeuwen, M. B. M. (1984) A comparative study of softeners and catalyst systems upon dimensional changes and sectioning quality of glycol methacrylate sections.J. Microsc 136, 383–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerrits, P. O. &Van Leeuwen, M. B. M. (1985) Glycol methacrylate embedding in histotechnology: factors which influence the evolution of heat during polymerization at room temperature.J. Microsc 139, 303–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerrits, P. O. &Van Leeuwen M. B. M. (1987) Glycol methacrylate embedding in histotechnology: the stability of glycol methacrylate sections.Stain Technol. 62, 181–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerrits, P. O. &Van Leeuwen M. B. M., Boon, M. E. &Kok, L. P. (1987) Floating on a water bath and mounting glycol methacrylate and hydroxypropyl methacrylate sections influence final dimensions.J. Microsc. 145, 107–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerrits, P. O. &Smid, L. (1983) A new, less toxic polymerization system for the embedding of soft tissues in glycol methacrylate and subsequent preparing of serial sections.J. Microsc. 132, 81–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerrits, P. O. &Zuideveld, R. (1983) The influence of dehydration media and catalyst systems upon the enzyme activity of tissues embedded in 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate: an evaluation of three dehydration media and two catalyst systems.Mikroscopie,40, 321–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansch, C., Leo, A., Unger, A., Kim, S. H. &Lien, E. G. (1973) Aromatic substituent constants for structureactivity correlationsJ. Med. Chem. 16, 1207–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanstede, J. G. &Gerrits, P. O. (1983) The effects of embedding in water-soluble plastics on the final dimensions of liver sections.J. Microsc. 131, 79–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hantschick, M., Wolf, E. &Dominok, G. (1988) Einfluss der Fixation, Dehydrierung und Polymethacrylateinbettung auf die Ergebnisse immun- und enzymhistochemischer Untersuchungen am lymphatischen Gewebe und Knochenmark.Acta Histochem. 35, 165–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higuchi, S., Suga, M., Dannenberg, A. M., Jr. &Schofield, B. H. (1979) Histochemical demonstration of enzyme activities in plastic and paraffin embedded tissue sections.Stain Technol. 54, 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horobin, R. W. (1982a) Staining plastic sections: a review of problems, explanations and possible solutions.J. Microsc. 131, 173–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horobin, R. W. (1982b) Histochemistry: an explanatory outline of histochemistry and biophysical staining. London, Stuttgart: Fischer. Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horobin, R. W. (1989),Understanding staining of water miscible resin sections. Datascope Services (Sheffield), Fifth Court, The University, Sheffield S10 2TN.

  • Ingamells, W. C. (1980) Important concepts in the dyeing and finishing of man-made fibres.J. of the Society of Dyers and Colourists 96, 466–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnovsky, M. J. (1965) A formaldehyde-glutaraldehyde fixative of high osmolarity for use in electron microscopy.J. Cell Biol. 27, 137a-8a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruddell, C. L. (1967) Embedding media for 1–2 miron sectioning. Hydroxyethyl methacrylate combined with 2-butoxyethanol.Stain Technol. 42, 253–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sax, N. I. (1984)Dangerous properties of industrial materials. 6th edn. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, B. (1974) A simple method of preparing 1–2 micron sections of large tissue blocks using glycolmethacrylate.J. Microsc. 101, 223–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gerrits, P.O., Horobin, R.W. & Hardonk, M.J. A numerical procedure for choosing effective, low toxicity plasticizers for glycol methacrylate embedding. Histochem J 22, 439–451 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01003464

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01003464

Keywords

Navigation