The Histochemical Journal

, Volume 10, Issue 5, pp 549–557 | Cite as

The Aldehyde Fuchsin and colloidal iron staining reactions in the canine thyroid C cell

  • W. E. W. Roediger
Papers
  • 25 Downloads

Synopsis

The cytochemically reactive groups which are responsible for Aldehyde Fuchsin (AF) and colloidal iron (CI) staining of C cells were investigated in the canine thyroid gland. To this end, stains for proteoglycans and peptide groups were utilized in conjuction with hydrolysis of glycosidic and amide bonds. In addition, the following procedures were used: acetylation, benzoylation, nitrozation, aldehyde blockade, sulphydryl blockade, methylation and mild acid hydrolysis.

No acidic proteoglycan, sialic acid, polyphosphate or polysaccharide ester sulphate were detected in C cells; the results suggest that AF staining, after an oxidation step, and CI staining are due to polypeptides. Sulphydryl and carboxyl groups together are necessary for mediating the attachment of AF in C cells and it is adduced that this attachment is due to the combined charges of sulphonic and carboxylic acids. Methylation and acetylation inhibit CI staining and those staining reactions that depend upon carboxylic acid (TB) and hydroxyl groups (PAS) for their dye attachment in C cells. acid hydrolysis, which increases the demonstration of carboxylic acid in C cells, decreases the attachment of hydroxyferric ions. I speculate that this inhibition is due to extraction of iron binding sites in the C cell and conclude that it is not solely carboxylic acids in C cells that are responsible for CI staining.

Keywords

Carboxylic Acid Sialic Acid Acid Hydrolysis Polyphosphate Iron Binding 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adms, C. W. M. (1956). A stricter interpretation of the ferric-ferrocyanide reaction with particular reference to the demonstration of protein-bound sulphydryl and di-sulphide groups.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 4, 24–35.Google Scholar
  2. Bangle, B. Jr. (1954). Gomori's paraldehyde-fuchsin stain. I. Physico-chemical and staining properties of the dye.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2, 291–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnard, E. A. (1961). Acylation and diazonium coupling in protein cytochemistry with special reference to the benzoylation-tetrazonium method. In:General Cytochemical Methods (ed. J. F. Danielli) pp. 203–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  4. Barrnett, R. J. &Seligman, A. M. (1954). Histochemical demonstration of protein-bound sulphydryl groups.J. Nat. Cancer Inst. 14, 769–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Clamp, J. R. &Hough, L. (1965). The periodate oxidation of amino acids with reference to studies on glycoproteins.Biochem. J. 94, 17–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Fisher, E. R. &Lillie, R. D. (1954). The effect of methylation on basophilia.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2, 81–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Fullmer, M. H. (1960). Effect of peracetic acid on the enzymatic digestion of various mucopolysaccharides: reversal of the PAS staining reaction of mucin.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 8, 113–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Gabe, M. (1959). Données histochimiques sur les cellules parafolliculaires de la glande thyroïde du chien.Acta Anat. 38, 332–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Geyer, R. (1962). Der Sulfonsäurenachweis. Eine neue Methode für den histochemischen Nachweis von Sulfonsäuren.Acta Histochem. 14, 26–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Greenspan, F. P. (1946). The convenient preparation of peracids.J. Am. Chem. Soc. 68, 907.Google Scholar
  11. Hake, T. (1965). Studies on the reaction of OsO4 and KMNO4 with amino acids.Lab. Invest. 14, 470–4.Google Scholar
  12. Landing, B. H., Hall, H. E. &West, C. D. (1956). Aldehyde-fuchsin positive material of the pituitary.Lab. Invest. 5, 256–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Leppi, T. j. &Stoward, P. J. (1965). On the use of testicular hyaluronidase for identifying acid mucins in tissue sections.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 13, 406–17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Lev, R. &Gerard, A. (1967). The histochemical demonstration of protein in epithelial mucins.J. Roy. Mic. Soc. 87, 361–73.Google Scholar
  15. Lietz, H. &Zippel, H. (1969). Cytochemische Untersuchungen zur vergleichenden Morphologie der C-Zellen in der Schilddrüse.Z. Zellforsch. 102, 85–98.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lillie, R. D. (1965).Histopathologic Technic and Practical Histochemistry. 3rd Edn. p. 282. New York: Blakiston.Google Scholar
  17. Lillie, R. D. &Glenner, G. G. (1957). Histochemical aldehyde blockade by aniline in glacial acetic acid.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 5, 167–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lillie, R. D. &Pizzolato, P. (1972). Mechanism of iron II and iron III sequence hematoxylin stains.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 20, 116–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lillie, R. D., Vacca, L. &Pizzolato, P. (1973). Hydroxyferric ions in histochemistry.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 21, 161–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Mahon, D. C. &Nair, K. K. (1975). Stoichiometry of the aldehyde fuchsin staining reaction for proteins.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 23, 653–9.Google Scholar
  21. Mander, S. T. K., Mander, L. N. &Carmichael, G. G. (1968). The staining mechanism of aldehyde-fuchsin with reference to the oxytalan fiber in the mouse.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 16, 480–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. McManus, J. F. A. &Mowry, R. W. (1964).Staining Methods — Histologic and Histochemical. p. 126. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  23. Mowry, R. W. (1958). Improved procedure for the staining of acidic polysaccharides by Müller's Colloidal (hydrous) ferric oxide and its combination with the Feulgen and the periodic acid — Schiff reactions.Lab. Invest. 7, 566–76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mowry, R. W. (1960). Revised method producing improved coloration of acidic polysaccharides with Alcian Blue 8GX supplied currently.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 8, 323.Google Scholar
  25. Müller, G. (1964). Kolloidchemische Untersuchungen zur eisenhydroxydsol Reaktion.Acta Histochem. 17, 61–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ortman, R., Forbes, W. F. &Balasubramanian, A. (1966). Concerning the staining properties of aldehyde basic fuchsin.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 14, 104–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Pearse, A. G. E. (1968).Histochemistry: Theoretical and Applied. Vol. 1. 3rd Edn. London: Churchill.Google Scholar
  28. Pearse, A. G. E. (1969). Random coil conformation of polypeptide hormone precursor protein in endocrine cells.Nature 221, 1210–1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Pearse, A. G. E. (1972).Histochemistry: Theoretical and Applied. Vol. 2. 3rd Edn. London: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
  30. Quintarelli, G. (1963). Histochemical identification of the salivary Mucins.Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 106, 339–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Roediger, W. E. W. (1977). Derivation of carboxyl groups for the ‘masked metachromasia’ of canine C cells by hydrolysis of polypeptides at the aspartyl group.Histochem. J. 9, 253–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Rosa, F. &Johnson, F. B. (1967). Enzymatic digestion in the cytochemical demonstration of glycogen.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 15, 14–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Rost, M. C. M. &Rost, F. W. D. (1975). Storage granules of thyroid C cells in the dog: a cytochemical and ultrastructural study in relation to the masked metachromasia reaction.Histochem. J. 7, 307–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Schmitz-Moorman, P. (1969). Zur Histochemie der Neuraminsäure.Histochemie.20, 78–86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Scott, H. R. &Clayton, B. P. (1953). A comparison of the staining affinities of aldehyde-fuchsin and the Schiff reagent.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 1, 336–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Scott, J. E. &Dorling, J. (1965). Differential staining of acid glycosaminoglycans (mucopolysaccharides) by Alcian Blue in salt solutions.Histochemie 5, 221–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Solcia, E. &Sampietro, R. (1968). New methods for staining secretory granules and 5-hydroxytryptamine in the thyroid C cells. In:Calcitonin Proceedings of the Symposium on Thyrocalcitonin and the C cells. (ed. S. Taylor) pp. 127–32. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  38. Spicer, S. S. &Warren, L. (1960). The histochemistry of sialic acid containing mucoproteins.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 8, 135–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Spicer, S. S. (1965). Diamine methods for differentiating muco-substances histochemically.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 13, 211–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Szirmai, J. A. (1963). Quantitative approaches in the histochemistry of mucopolysaccharides.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 11, 24–34.Google Scholar
  41. Von Denffer, H. (1973). The site and nature of aldehyde fuchsin staining of pancreatic beta granules.Histochemie 36, 97–113.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman and Hall Ltd. 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. E. W. Roediger
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Anatomy, Medical SchoolUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations