Skip to main content
Log in

Graphic representation of the distribution of acetylcholinesterase in cat dorsal root ganglion neurons

  • Papers
  • Published:
The Histochemical Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Synopsis

Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity of primary sensory neurons of the cat has been quantitated and correlated with cell size. Dorsal root ganglia of the fourth and fifth thoracic spinal levels were studied. Frozen longitudinal and cross-sections were collected serially and stained with Cresyl Violet for total cell counts of the ganglia on the left; the average count was 3375 cells. Ganglia from the right were stained for AChE after the method of Karnovsky & Roots (1964) as modified by El Badawi & Schenk (1967), and counterstained with Haematoxylin. Cells were counted in every fourth section and the diameter of each was recorded. AChE-positive cells were classified as brown (B1, B2, B3) and AChE-negative ones as blue (BL).

An inverse correlation exists between cell size and AChE activity. High activity was demonstrated in 29% of the cells (B1), moderate activity in 52% (B2), minimal activity in 15% (B3) and 4% were classified as AChE-negative (BL). Small cells with high activity were centrally located in the ganglia whereas large AChE-negative cells were peripherally distributed. Chi-Square analysis revealed that the size of the cell was not independent of the enzyme colour category.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cauna, N. &Naik, N. T. (1963). The distribution of cholinesterases in the sensory ganglia of man and some mammals.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 11, 129–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, H. A. &Ranson, S. W. (1931). Ratios of cells and fibers and of myelinated to unmyelinated fibers in spinal nerve roots.Am. J. Anat. 49, 193–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, A. D. (1963). Fine structure of nerve cell bodies and satellite cells of the trigeminal ganglion.J. Dent. Res. 42, 990–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • El Badawi, A. &Schenk, E. A. (1967). Histochemical methods for the separate, consecutive, and simultaneous demonstration of acetylcholinesterase and norepinephrine in cryostat sections.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 16, 580–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernstrom, R. C. (1958). A durable Nissl stain for frozen sections and paraffin sections.Stain Tech. 33, 175–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giacobini, E. (1956). Histochemical demonstration of AChE activity in isolated nerve cells.Acta physiol. scan. 36, 276–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomori, G. (1952).Microscopic histochemistry: principles and practice. University of Chicago Press.

  • Hamberger, V. &Levi-Montalcini, R. (1949). Proliferation, differentiation and degeneration of spinal ganglia of chick embryos under normal and experimental conditions.J. Exp. Zool. 111, 457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatai, S. (1902). Number and size of the spinal ganglion cells and dorsal root fibers in the white rat at different ages.J. comp. Neurol. 12, 107–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinsey, J. C., Krupp, M. A. &Lhamon, W. T. (1937). Reaction of spinal ganglion cells to section of dorsal roots.J. comp. Neurol. 67, 205–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnovsky, M. J. &Roots, L. (1964). A ‘direct coloring’ thiocholine method for cholinesterases.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 12, 219–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koelle, G. B. (1962). A new general concept of the neurohumoral functions of acetylcholine and acetylcholinesterase.J. Pharmacol. 14, 65–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokko, A. (1965). Histochemical and cytophotometric observations on esterases in the spinal ganglia of the rat.Acta. physiol. scand. 66, suppl. 261, 1–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konigsmark, B. W. (1970). Methods for the counting of neurons. In:Contemporary Research Methods in Neuroanatomy (Eds. W. J. H. Nauta & S. O. Ebbesson) pp. 315–340. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mckinnis, M. (1936). The numbers of ganglion cells in the dorsal root ganglia of the second and third cervical nerves in human fetuses of various ages.Anat. Rec. 95, 255–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offord, K., Oenning, R. F. &Dyke, P. J. (1974). Method of morphometric evaluation of spinal and autonomic ganglia.J. Neurol. Sci. 22, 65–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohta, M., Offord, K. &Dyke, P. J. (1974). Morphometric evaluation of the first sacral ganglia in man.J. Neurol. Sci. 22, 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanta, T. R. (1967). Enzyme histochemistry of the mesenteric and dorsal root ganglion cells of cat and squirrel monkey.Histochemie 10, 234–45;

    Google Scholar 

  • Strumia, E. &Baima-Ballone, P. L. (1964). Acetylcholinesterase activity in the spinal ganglia of the chick embryo during development.Acta Anat. 57, 281–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tewari, H. B. &Bourne, G. H. (1962). Histochemical evidence of metabolic cycles in spinal ganglion cells of the rat.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 10, 42–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weschler, W. (1967). Electron microscopic investigation of the development of autonomic (sympathetic trunk) and spinal ganglia inGallus domesticus.Acta Neuroveg. 30, 427–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youngstrom, K. A. (1941). Acetylcholinesterase concentration during development of the human fetus.J. Neurophysiol. 4, 473–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ambrose, W.W., Mcneill, M.E. Graphic representation of the distribution of acetylcholinesterase in cat dorsal root ganglion neurons. Histochem J 10, 711–720 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01003120

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01003120

Keywords

Navigation