Skip to main content
Log in

The attractive voice: What makes it so?

  • Published:
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous research has shown that more attractive voices are associated with more favorable personality impressions. The present study examined which acoustic characteristics make a voice attractive. Segments of recorded voices were rated on various dimensions of voice quality, attractiveness, and personality impressions. Objective measures of voice quality were obtained from spectrogram analysis. Overall, the subjective ratings of voice quality predicted vocal attractiveness better than the objective measures. When vocal attractiveness was regressed onto both subjective and objective measures, the final regression equation included 8 subjective measures, which together accounted for 74% of the variance of the attractiveness scores. It also was found that the measures of voice quality accounted for variance in favorableness of personality impressions above and beyond the contribution of vocal attractiveness. Thus, attractiveness captures an important dimension of the voice but does not cover all aspects of voice quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Addington, D. W. (1968). The relationship of selected vocal characteristics to personality perception.Speech Monographs, 35 492–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronovitch, C. D. (1976). The voice of personality: Stereotyped judgments and their relation to voice quality and sex of speaker.The Journal of Social Psychology, 99 202–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1974). Physical attractiveness. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 158–215). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1985).The NEO Personality Inventory manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, E., & Sprecher, S. (1986).Mirror, mirror ... the importance of looks in everyday life. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, E. (1964). Personality stereotypes in voice: A reconsideration of the data.The Journal of Social Psychology, 62 247–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyake, K., & Zuckerman, M. (in press). Beyond personality impressions: Effects of physical and vocal attractiveness on false consensus, social comparison, affiliation, and assumed and perceived similarity.Journal of Personality.

  • Pearce, W. B., & Conklin, F. (1971). Nonverbal vocalic communication and perceptions of a speaker.Speech Monographs, 38 235–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K. R. (1974). Voice quality analysis of American and German speakers.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 3 281–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K. R. (1978). Personality inference from voice quality: The loud voice of extroversion.European Journal of Social Psychology, 8 467–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K. R. (1979a). Voice and speech correlates of perceived social influence. In H. Giles & R. N. St. Clair (Eds.),Language and social psychology (pp. 88–120). London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K. R. (1979b). Personality markers in speech. In K.R. Scherer & H. Giles (Eds.),Social markers in speech (pp. 147–209). London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K. R. (1982). Methods of research on vocal communication: Paradigms and parameters. In K.R. Scherer & P. Ekman (Eds.),Handbook of methods in nonverbal behavior research (pp. 136–198). London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K. R. (1986). Vocal affect expression: A review and a model for future research.Psychological Bulletin, 99 143–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K. R., & Oshinsky, J. S. (1977). Cue utilization in emotion attribution from auditory stimuli.Motivation and Emotion, 1 331–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sereno, K. K., & Hawkins, G. J. (1967). The effects of variations in speakers' nonfluency upon audience ratings of attitude toward the speech topic and speakers' credibility.Speech Monographs, 34 58–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. L., Brown, B. L., Strong, W. J., & Rencher, A. C. (1975). Effects of speech rate on personality perception.Language and Speech, 18 1451–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., & Driver, R. (1989). What sounds beautiful is good: The vocal attractiveness stereotype.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 13 67–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., & Hodgins, H. S. (1992). Developmental changes in the effects of the physical and vocal attractiveness stereotypes. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Zuckerman, M., Hodgins, H., & Miyake, K. (1990). The vocal attractiveness stereotypes: Replication and elaboration.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 14 97–112.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by National Institute of Mental Health Grant MH40498.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zuckerman, M., Miyake, K. The attractive voice: What makes it so?. J Nonverbal Behav 17, 119–135 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01001960

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01001960

Keywords

Navigation