Designing an effective dispute resolution system

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Allison, G. (forthcoming). “Rules of prudence.” InWindows of opportunity: From Cold War to peaceful competition in U.S.-Soviet relations, eds. G. Allison and W. L. Ury. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.

  2. Bacow, L. andMulkey, J. (1982). “Overcoming local opposition to hazardous waste facilities: The Massachusetts experience.”Harvard Environmental Law Review 6: 265–305.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Davis, A. M. (1986). “Dispute resolution at an early age.”Negotiation Journal 2: 287–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dunlop, J. T. (1984).Dispute resolution, negotiation, and consensus building. Dover, Mass.: Auburn House.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dunlop, J. T. andSalter, M. S. (1987). “Note on forums and governance.” Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Business School Working Paper 0-388-046.

  6. Goldberg, S.B., Green, E. D. andSander, F. E. A. (1985).Dispute resolution. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kanter, R. andMorgan, E. (1987). “The new alliances: First report on the formation and significance of a labor-management ‘business partnership’.” Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Business School Working Paper 87-042.

  8. Katz, N. andUhler, K. L. (1983). “An alternative to violence: Nonviolent struggle for change.” InPrevention and control of aggression. New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kochan, T. A., Katz, H. C. andMcKersie, R. B. (1986).The transformation of American industrial relations. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kolb, D. M. (1986). “Who are organizational third parties and what do they do?” InResearch on Negotiations in Organizations, ed. R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, and M. H. Bazerman. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kolb, D. M. andSheppard, B. H. (1985). “Do managers mediate or even arbitrate?”Negotiation Journal 1: 379–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. McGillicuddy, N. B., Welton, G. L. andPruitt, D. G. (1987). “Third-party intervention: A field experiment comparing three different models.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53: 104–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. McGillis, D. (1987).Consumer dispute resolution: A survey of programs. Washington: National Institute for Dispute Resolution.

    Google Scholar 

  14. McKersie, R. B. andShropshire, W. W. (1962). “Avoiding written grievances: A successful program.”Journal of Business 35: 135–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. McGovern, F. E. (1986). “Toward a functional approach for managing complex litigation.”University of Chicago Law Review 33: 440–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Merry, S. E. (1987). “The culture and practice of mediation in parent-child conflicts.”Negotiation Journal 3: 411–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Raiffa, H. andLax, D.A. (1987). “Touchdowns in the football impasse.”Los Angeles Times, November 9, 1987, p. 7.

  18. Rowe, M. P. (1984). “The non-union complaint system at MIT: An upward-feedback mediation model.”Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation 2: 10–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sheppard, B. H. (1983). “Managers as inquisitors: Some lessons from the law.” InNegotiating in Organizations, ed. M. H. Bazerman and R. J. Lewicki. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Slaikeu, K. A. andMacDonald, C. B. (1987).Conflict resolution in churches: A model for systems consultation. Austin, Tex.: Center for Conflict Management.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Susskind, L. andCruickshank, J. (1987).Breaking the impasse: Consensual approaches to resolving public disputes. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Susskind, L. andMcMahon, J. (1985). “The theory and practice of negotiated rulemaking.”Yale Journal on Regulation 3: 133–165.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ury, W. L. (1985).Beyond the hotline. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ury, W. L., Brett, J. M. andGoldberg, S. B. (1988).Getting disputes resolved. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wexley, K. N. andLatham, G. P. (1981).Developing and training human resources in organizations. Glenview, Ill.: Scott, Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Editor's Note: This article is an adaptation of Chapter 3 of the authors' new book,Getting Disputes Resolved, to be published by Jossey Bass, Inc., San Francisco, in November 1988. Copyright © 1988, Jossey Bass, Inc. Reprinted by permission.

William L. Ury is Associate Director of the Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School, 514 Pound Hall, Harvard Law School, Cambridge, Mass. 02138.Jeanne M. Brett is J. L. Kellogg Professor of Dispute Resolution and Organizations at the Kellogg Graduate School of Management of Northwestern University, Evanston, Ill. 60201.Stephen B. Goldberg is Professor of Law at the Northwestern University School of Law, 357 E. Chicago Ave., Chicago, Ill. 60611.

We are indebted to many dispute systems designers who spent many hours sharing, their experiences and wisdom with us: Richard Chasin, John Dunlop, Mary Margaret Golten, Eric Green, William Hobgood, Deborah Kolb, Michael Lewis, Bernard Mayer, Marguerite Millhauser, Robert Mnookin, Christopher Moore, Richard Salem, Carl Schneider, Raymond Shonholtz, Sylvia Skratek, Linda Singer, Karl Slaikeu, Lawrence Susskind, Marty Van Parys, and Susan Wildau. For valuable comments, we are also indebted to: Graham Allison, James Anderson, Max Bazerman, Beth Cataldo, Phillip Cousins, Harry Edwards, Julius Getman, Thomas Kochan, Linda Lane, David Lax, Michael LeRoy, Roy Lewicki, Martin Linsky, Robert McKersie, Jeffrey Rubin, Marc Sarkady, Frank Sander, Elizabeth Sherwood, Mark Sommer, and Rolf Valtin.

About this article

Cite this article

Ury, W.L., Brett, J.M. & Goldberg, S.B. Designing an effective dispute resolution system. Negot J 4, 413–431 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01000777

Download citation

Keywords

  • Dispute Resolution
  • Negotiation Journal
  • Mediation Program
  • Dispute Resolution System
  • Conventional Arbitration