Advertisement

Journal of Nonverbal Behavior

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 188–194 | Cite as

Learning to detect deception from three communication channels

  • Miron Zuckerman
  • Richard Koestner
  • Michele J. Colella
Article

Abstract

A Lie Detection Test—a videotape of senders delivering truthful and deceptive messages—was administered to subjects via one of three channels: Face only, speech only, or face plus speech. Feedback information, identifying the messages as truthful or deceptive, was given to some subjects (learning condition) but not to others (control). It was found that subjects in the learning condition performed better overall relative to control subjects, regardless of the channel presented to them. In addition, however, accuracy of subjects in the learning condition improved progressively over the course of the test (relative to control), for the speech only and face plus speech channels but not for the face only channel. This effect was interpreted in terms of the limited number of deception cues offered by the face.

Keywords

Control Subject Social Psychology Communication Channel Learning Condition Feedback Information 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W.V. Nonverbal leakage and cues to deception.Psychiatry, 1969,32, 88–106.Google Scholar
  2. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W.V. Detecting deception from the body or face.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974,29, 288–298.Google Scholar
  3. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R.L.Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1984.Google Scholar
  4. Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D.B. A single, general purpose display of magnitude of experimental effect.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1982,74, 166–169.Google Scholar
  5. Zuckerman, M., Amidon, M.D., Bishop, S.E., & Pomerantz, S.D. Face and tone of voice in the communication of deception.Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 1982,43, 347–357.Google Scholar
  6. Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B.M., & Rosenthal, R. The verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 14. New York: Academic Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  7. Zuckerman, M., Koestner, R., & Alton, A.O. Learning to detect deception.Journal of Personality and Social PSychology, 1984,46, 519–528.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miron Zuckerman
    • 1
  • Richard Koestner
  • Michele J. Colella
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of RochesterRochester

Personalised recommendations