Biofeedback and Self-regulation

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 177–183 | Cite as

The relationship between capacity for absorption and chronic headache patients' response to relaxation and biofeedback treatment

  • Debra F. Neff
  • Edward B. Blanchard
  • Frank Andrasik
Original Articles

Abstract

A sample of 49 chronic headache patients (35 vascular and 14 tension) was separated according to capacity for absorption (as measured by Tellegen & Atkinson's 1974 scale) into groups high in absorption and groups low in absorption, with patients in the middle range being excluded. Absorption capacity was found to affect response to treatment in complex ways. Vascular headache patients high in absorption were significantly improved following relaxation training, but not after biofeedback training. Vascular headache patients low in absorption were significantly improved after biofeedback training. Tension headache patients low in absorption did not respond significantly to either form of treatment, while those high in absorption responded significantly to biofeedback training. Reasons for these differences in response to treatment were discussed.

Keywords

Health Psychology Absorption Capacity Headache Patient Chronic Headache Middle Range 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ad Hoc Committee on Classification of Headache. Classification of headache.Journal of the American Medical Association 1962,6 717–718.Google Scholar
  2. Andrasik, F., Blanchard, E. B., Arena, J. G., Teders, S. J., Teevan, R. C., & Rodichok, L. D. Psychological functioning in headache sufferers.Psychosomatic Medicine 1982,44 171–182.Google Scholar
  3. Bernstein, D. A., & Borkovec, T. D.Progressive relaxation training. Champaign, Illinois: Research Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  4. Blanchard, E. B., Andrasik, F., Ahles, T. A., Teders, S. J., & O'Keefe, D. Migraine and tension headache: A meta-analytic review.Behavior Therapy 1980,11 613–631.Google Scholar
  5. Blanchard, E. B., Andrasik, F., & Silver, B. V. Biofeedback and relaxation in the treatment of tension headache: A reply to Belar.Journal of Behavioral Medicine 1980,3 227–232.Google Scholar
  6. Blanchard, E. B., Theobald, D. E., Williamson, D. A., Silver, B. V., & Brown, D. A. Temperature biofeedback in the treatment of migraine headache.Archives of General Psychiatry 1978,35 581–588.Google Scholar
  7. Qualls, P. J., & Sheehan, P. W. Capacity for absorption and relaxation during electromyograph biofeedback and no-feedback conditions.Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1979,88 652–662.Google Scholar
  8. Qualls, P. J., & Sheehan, P. W. Electromyograph biofeedback as a relaxation technique: A critical appraisal and reassessment.Psychological Bulletin 1981,90 21–42. (a)Google Scholar
  9. Qualls, P. J., & Sheehan, P. W. Role of the feedback signal in electromyograph biofeedback: The relevance of attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1981,110 204–216. (b)Google Scholar
  10. Qualls, P. J., & Sheehan, P. W. Imagery encouragement, absorption capacity and relaxation during electromyograph biofeedback.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1981,41 370–379. (c)Google Scholar
  11. Tellegen, A., & Atkinson, G. Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences (“absorption”): A trait related to hynotic susceptibility.Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1974,83 268–277.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Debra F. Neff
    • 1
  • Edward B. Blanchard
    • 1
  • Frank Andrasik
    • 1
  1. 1.SUNY-AlbanyUSA

Personalised recommendations