Advertisement

Negotiation Journal

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 23–36 | Cite as

Explaining a paradox of mediation

  • Craig A. McEwen
  • Thomas W. Milburn
In Theory
  • 29 Downloads

Keywords

Dispute Resolution Pressure Entry Negotiation Journal Community Mediation Conflict Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abel, R. (1982).The politics of informal justice, vol. vn2. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  2. Auerbach, J. S. (1983).Justice without law? New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bercovitch, J. (1986). “International mediation: A study of the incidence, strategies and conditions of successful outcomes.”Cooperation and Conflict 21: 155–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. -- andLamare, O. (1992). “International mediation: Some notes toward a causal model.” Unpublished paper presented to the International Society of Political Psychology, San Francisco, 7 July 1992.Google Scholar
  5. Bush, R. A. B. (1989). “Mediation and adjudication, dispute resolution and ideology: An imaginary conversation.”Journal of Contemporary Legal Problems 3: 1–33.Google Scholar
  6. Carnevale, P. J. andPruitt, D. G. (1992). “Negotiation and mediation.”Annual Review of Psychology 43: 531–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carter, J. (1982).Keeping faith: Memorirs of a president. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
  8. Clarke, S., Valente, E., andMace, R. (1992).Mediation of interpersonal disputes in North Carolina: An evaluation. Chapel Hill, N.C.: University of North Carolina Institute of Government.Google Scholar
  9. Cohn, E. S. andNeyhart, M. L. (1991). “Factors affecting public acceptance of mediation.” InCommunity mediation: A handbook for practitioners and researchers edited by K. Duffy, J. Grosch, and P. Olczak. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  10. Felstiner, W., Abel, R. andSarat, A. (1980–81). “The emergence and transformation of disputes: Naming, blaming and claiming.”Law & Society Review 15: 631–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fiss, O. (1984). “Against settlement.”Yale Law Journal 93: 1073–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Forester, J. (1992). “Envisioning the politics of public sector dispute resolution,” inStudies in law, politics and society, vol. 12., edited by S. Silbey and A. Sarat. Greenwich, Conn: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  13. Goldberg, S., Green, E., andSander, F. (1985).Dispute resolution. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  14. Grillo, T. (1991). “The mediation alternative: Process dangers for women.”Yale Law Journal 100: 1545–1611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harrington, C. B. andMerry, S. E. (1988). “Ideological production: The making of community mediation.”Law & Society Review 22: 709–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jones, E. E. andDavis, K. E. (1965). “From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception.” InAdvances in experimental social psychology, vol. 2, edited by L. Berkowitz. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  17. Keating, M. E. (1992). “Complainant-respondent differences in conflict tactic sequences.” Unpublished M.A. project, State University of New York at Buffalo.Google Scholar
  18. Kressel, K. andPruitt, D. G. (1989). “Conclusion: A research perspective on the mediation of social conflict.” InMediation research: The process and effectiveness of third-party intervention edited by K. Kressel and D. Pruitt. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  19. Lieb, D. (1975). “Iran and Iraq at Algiers, 1975.” InInternational mediation in theory and practice edited by S. Touval and I. W. Zartman. Boulder, Colo: Westview.Google Scholar
  20. mather, L. andYngvesson, B. (1980–81). “Language, audience, and the transformation of disputes.”Law & Society Review 15: 775–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Matz, D. E. (1987). “Why disputes don't go to mediation.”Mediation Quarterly 17: 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McEwen, G. A. andMaiman, R. M. (1982). “Arbitration and mediation as alternatives to court.”Policy Studies Journal 10: 712–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. —— and —— (1984). “Mediation in small claims court: Achieving compliance through consent.”Law & Society Review 18: 11–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Merrills, J. G. (1991).International dispute settlement 2nd ed. Cambridge: Grotius.Google Scholar
  25. Merry, S. E. (1989). “Mediation in nonindustrial societies.” InMediation research: The process and effectiveness of third-party intervention edited by K. Kressel and D. Pruitt. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  26. —— andSilbey, S. S. (1984). “What do plaintiffs want? Reexamining the concept of dispute.”The Justice System Journal 9: 151–179.Google Scholar
  27. Morrill, C. (1991). “Conflict management, honor, and organizational change.”American Journal of Sociology 97: 585–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nader, L. (1990).Harmony ideology: Justice and control in a Zapotec mountain village. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  29. Nelle, A. (1992). “Making mediation mandatory: A proposed framework.”Ohio State Journal of Dispute Resolution 7: 287–313.Google Scholar
  30. Peachey, D. (1989). “What people want from mediation.” InMediation research: The process and effectiveness of third-party interventions edited by K. Kressel and D. Pruitt. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  31. Pearson, J. andThoennes, N. (1989). “Divorce mediation: Reflections on a decade of research.” InMediation research: The process and effectiveness of third-party intervention edited by K. Kressel and D. Pruitt. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  32. Princen, T. (1987). “International mediation — The view from the Vatican: Lessons from mediating the Beagle Channel dispute.”Negotiation Journal 3: 347–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pruitt, D. andRubin, J. (1986).Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  34. Richman, R. (1991). “Civil dispute processing in China during reform.”Ohio State Journal of Dispute Resolution 7: 83–113.Google Scholar
  35. Roehl, J. andCook, R. (1989). “Mediation in interpersonal disputes: effectiveness and limitations.’ InMediation research: The process and effectiveness of third-party intervention edited by K. Kressel and D. Pruitt. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  36. Rogers, N. andMcEwen, C. (1989).Mediation: Law, policy, practice. Rochester, N.Y.: Lawyers Cooperative Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  37. Ross, L. (1977). “The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process.” InAdvances in experimental social psychology, vol. 10, edited by L. Berkowitz. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  38. Society of Professionals in Dispute Resolution. (1991).Mandated participation and settlement coercion: Dispute resolution as it relates to the courts. Washington, D.C.: Society of Professionals in Dispute Resolution.Google Scholar
  39. Touval, S. andZartman, I. W. (1985). “Introduction: International mediation in theory.” InInternational mediation in theory and practice edited by S. Touval and I. W. Zartman. Boulder, Colo.: Westview.Google Scholar
  40. Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J. H., andJackson, D. D. (1967).Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Craig A. McEwen
  • Thomas W. Milburn

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations