Skip to main content
Log in

Have economic fluctuations been dampened? New empirical evidence from Italy

  • Published:
Open Economies Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using new series of aggregate and disaggregate output, this paper examines the historical pattern of volatility of economic fluctuations in Italy. Results evidence a higher stability in the postwar era, with respect to both the prewar and the interwar periods. Evidence is provided that the higher degree of stabilization of the Italian business cycle cannot be entirely attributed to the shift in the composition of aggregate output from more to less cyclical sectors. It is shown, however, that although the sign of the change in volatility is invariant to the filter adopted for the decomposition into trend and cycle, this is not true for both its size and statistical significance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Backus, D.K. and P.J. Kehoe (1992) “International Evidence on the Historical Properties of Business Cycles,”American Economic Review 4, 864–888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, M.S. (1937) “Properties of Sufficiency and Statistical Tests,”Proceedings of the Royal Society, series A, No. 160.

  • Bergman, M. and L. Jonung (1989) “Has the Business Cycle Been Dampened? The Case for Sweden and the United States,” Stockholm School of Economics, mimeo.

  • Burns, A. (1960) “Progress Toward Economic Stability,”American Economic Review 1, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Long, J.B. and L. Summers (1984) “The Changing Cyclical Variability of Economic Activity in the United States,” NBER Working Paper No. 1450, September.

  • Fuà, G. (ed), (1969)Lo sviluppo economico in Italia, vol. 3, Milan: Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodrick, R.J. and E.C. Prescott (1981) “Post-War U.S. Business Cycles: An Empirical Investigation,” Discussion Paper No. 451, Carnegie-Mellon University.

  • ISTAT (1957) “Indagine statistica sullo sviluppo del reddito nazionale dell'Italia dal 1861 al 1956,”Annali di Statistica, Rome.

  • ISTAT (1986)Annuario di Contabilità Nazionale, Rome.

  • ISTAT (1990)Nuova Contabilità Nazionale, Rome.

  • King, R.G. and S.T. Rebelo (1993) “Low Frequency Filtering and Real Business Cycles,”Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 17, 207–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwiatkowski, D., P.C.B. Phillips, P. Schmidt, and Y. Shin (1992) “Testing the Null Hypothesis of Stationarity Against the Alternative of a Unit Root,”Journal of Econometrics 1, 159–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, B.R. (1976)European Historical Statistics 1750–1970. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newey, W.K. and K.D. West (1987) “A Simple, Positive Semi-Definite Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Covariance Matrix,”Econometrica 3, 703–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perron, P. (1989) “The Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock, and the Unit Root Hypothesis,”Econometrica 6, 1361–1401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perron, P. (1990) “Testing for a Unit Root in a Time Series with a Changing Mean,”Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 2, 153–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prescott, E. (1986) “Theory Ahead of Business Cycle Measurement,” Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series No. 25, 11–44.

  • Rappoport, P. and L. Reichlin (1986) “On Broken Trends, Random Walsk and Non-Stationary Cycles.” In M. Di Matteo, R.W. Goodwin, and A. Vercelli (eds),Technological and Social Factors in Long Term Fluctuations. Proceedings of a conference held in Siena. Berlin: Springer, pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappoport, P. and L. Reichlin (1989) “Segmented Trends and Non-Stationary Time Series,”Economic Journal 395, 168–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichlin, L. (1989) “Structural Change and Unit Root Econometrics,”Economics Letters 3, 231–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, C.D. (1986) “Is the Stabilization of the Postwar Economy a Figment of the Data?”American Economic Review 3, 314–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, C.D. (1989) “The Prewar Business Cycle Reconsidered: New Estimates of Gross National Product, 1869–1908,”Journal of Political Economy 1, 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, N., A. Sorgato, and G. Toniolo (1993) “Italian Historical Statistics: 1890–1990,”Rivista di Storia Economica 1, 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlitzer, G. (1995) “Testing the Stationarity of Economic Time Series: Further Monte Carlo Evidence,”Ricerche Economiche 49, 125–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheffrin, S.M. (1988) “Have Economic Fluctuations Been Dampened? A Look at Evidence Outside the United States,”Journal of Monetary Economics 21, 73–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toniolo, G. (1990)An Economic History of Lilberal Italy 1850–1918. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitali, O. (1992) “Gli implieghi del reddito nel 1911.” Inl conti economici dell'Italia. Una stima del valore aggiunto per il 1911, a cura di G. Rey, Rome.

  • Watson, M. (1994) “Business Cycle Duration and Postwar Stabilization of the U.S. Economy,”American Economic Review 1, 24–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarnowitz, V. and G.H. Moore (1986) “Major Changes in Cyclical Behavior.” In R.J. Gordon (ed),The American Business Cycle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schlitzer, G. Have economic fluctuations been dampened? New empirical evidence from Italy. Open Econ Rev 6, 387–397 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01000389

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01000389

Key words

Navigation