Abstract
Can termination occur withboth a bang and a whimper? This article examines the termination of Oklahoma's State Training Schools for dependent and neglected children and the continuation of the policy of institutionalization and detention through the use of admission to psychiatric hospitals and treatment centers. This case study is discussed in light of Peter deLeon's model of termination and Herbert Kaufman's theory of organizational evolution, and demonstrates the resiliency of public policy, even in the face of organizational termination.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bardach, Eugene (1976). ‘Policy termination as a political process,’Policy Sciences 7: 123–131.
Behn, Robert D. (1976). ‘Closing the Massachusetts public training schools,’Policy Sciences 7: 151–171.
Behn, Robert D. (1978a). ‘How to terminate a public policy: A dozen hints for the would be terminator,’Policy Analysis 4: 393–413.
Behn, Robert D. (1978b). ‘Closing a government facility,’Public Administration Review 38: 332–338.
Beyer, Marty, Paul DeMuro and Ira Schwartz (1990).Comprehensive Services for Oklahoma's Delinquent, Deprived, In Need of Treatment, and In Need of Services Children: Final Report. Oklahoma City, OK: Department of Human Services, State of Oklahoma.
Bradley, Valerie (1976). ‘Policy termination in mental health: The hidden agenda,’Policy Sciences 7: 215–224.
Brewer, Garry D. (1978). ‘Termination: Hard choices, harder questions,’Public Administration Review 38: 338–344.
Cameron, James M. (1987). ‘Ideology and policy termination: Restructuring California's mental health system,’ in Judith V. May and Aaron B. Wildsavsky, eds.,The Policy Cycle. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 301–328.
Daniels, Mark R. (1993). ‘The politics and economics of dependent children's mental health care financing: The Oklahoma paradox,’Journal of Health and Human Services Administration 16: 171–196.
deLeon, Peter (1978a). ‘Public policy termination: An end and a beginning,’Policy Analysis 4: 369–392.
deLeon, Peter (1978b). ‘A theory of policy termination,’ in Judith V. May and Aaron B. Wildavsky, eds.,The Policy Cycle. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 279–300.
deLeon, Peter (1982). ‘New perspectives on program termination,’Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 2: 108–111.
deLeon, Peter (1983). ‘Policy evaluation and program termination,’Policy Studies Review 2: 631–647.
deLeon, Peter (1987). ‘Policy termination as a political phenomenon,’ in Dennis Palumbo, ed.,The Politics of Program Evaluation. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications, pp. 173–199.
Department of Human Services, State of Oklahoma, Health Care Financing Administration Form HCFA 2082: 1982–1990.
Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse (1990).A Report on Psychiatric Residential Service Needs for Children and Adolescents in Oklahoma. Oklahoma City, Oklahoma: State of Oklahoma.
Empey, La Mar T. (1970). ‘Alternatives to incarceration,’ in Paul Lerman, ed.,Delinquency and Social Policy. New York: Praeger Publishers, pp. 298–317.
Frantz, Janet E. (1992). ‘Reviving and revising a termination model,’Policy Sciences 25: 175–189.
Jones, Charles O. (1984).An Introduction to the Study of Public Policy. Monterey, California: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
Katzenbach, Edward L. (1958). ‘The horse cavalry in the twentieth century: A study of policy response,’Public Policy 8: 120–149.
Kaufman, Herbert (1976).Are Government Organizations Immoral? Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Daniels, M.R. Organizational termination and policy continuation: Closing the Oklahoma Public Training Schools. Policy Sci 28, 301–315 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01000291
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01000291