Research on policy communities, policy networks, and advocacy coalitions represents the most recent effort by policy scholars in North America and Europe to meaningfully describe and explain the complex, dynamic policy making processes of modern societies. While work in this tradition has been extraordinarily productive, issues of collective action have not been carefully addressed. Focusing on the advocacy coalitions (AC) framework developed by Sabatier (1988) and Sabatier and Jenkins-Smith (1993) as an example of a productive research program within the policy network tradition, this article (1) examines the potential of the AC framework, with its emphasis on beliefs, policy learning, and preference formation, to provide richer explanations of policy making processes than frameworks grounded exclusively in instrumental rationality; (2) suggests that paradoxically, however, the AC framework can more fully realize its potential by admitting the explanations of collective action from frameworks based on instrumental rationality; (3) incorporates within the AC framework accounts of how coalitions form and maintain themselves over time and of the types of strategies coalitions are likely to adopt to pursue their policy goals; and (4) derives falsifiable collective action hypotheses that can be empirically tested to determine whether incorporating theories of collective action within the AC framework represents a positive, rather than a degenerative, expansion of the AC framework.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Atkinson, Michael and William Coleman (1989).The State, Business, and Industrial Change In Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Bennett, Colin and Michael Howlett (1992). ‘The lessons of learning: reconciling, theories of policy learning and policy change.’Policy Sciences 25: 275–295.
Binger, Brian and Elizabeth Hoffman (1989). ‘Institutional persistence and change: the question of efficiency.’Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 145: 67–84.
Browne, William (1988).Private Interests, Public Policy, and American Agriculture. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Browne, William (1990). ‘Organized interests and their issue niches: a search for pluralism in a policy domain.’Journal of Politics 52: 477–509.
Coleman, William and Grace Skogstad (1990a). ‘Policy communities and policy networks: a structural approach,’ in William Coleman and Grace Skogstad, eds.Policy Communities and Public Policy in Canada: A Structural Approach. Missessauga, ON: Copp Clark Pitman, pp. 14–33.
Coleman, William and Grace Skogstad, eds. (1990b).Policy Communities and Public Policy in Canada: A Structural Approach. Mississauga, ON: Copp Clark Pitman.
Collie, Melissa (1988). ‘The legislature and distributive policy making in formal perspective.’Legislative Studies Quarterly 13 (4): 427–458.
Dryzek, John (1990).Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy, and Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Etzioni, Amitai (1988).The Moral Dimension: Toward a New Economics. New York: The Free Press.
Guth, Werner and Reinhard Tietz (1990). ‘Ultimatum bargaining behavior: A survey and comparison of experimental results.’Journal of Economic Psychology 11: 417–449.
Hackett, Steven, Edella Schlager, Jamer Walker (1994). ‘The role of communication in resolving commons dilemmas: experimental evidence with heterogeneous appropriators.’Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 27: 99–126.
Hammond, Thomas and Jack Knott (1988). ‘The deregulatory snowball: explaining deregulation in the financial industry.’Journal of Politics 50: 3–30.
Heap, Shaun Hargreaves (1989).Rationality in Economics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Heclo, Hugh (1974).Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Heinz, John, Edward Laumann, Robert Nelson, and Robert Salisbury (1993).The Hollow Core: Private Interests in National Policy Making. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Issac, Mark and James Walker (1988). ‘Communication and free-riding behavior: the voluntary contribution mechanism.’Economic Inquiry 26: 585–608.
Jenkins-Smith, Hank, et al. (1991). ‘Explaining change in policy subsystems: analysis of coalition stability and defection over time.’American Journal of Political Science 35 (4): 851–872.
Jenkins-Smith, Hank and Paul Sabatier (1993a). ‘The study of public policy processes,’ in Paul Sabatier and Hank Jenkins-Smith, eds.Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 1–9.
Jenkins-Smith, Hank and Paul Sabatier (1993b). ‘The dynamics of policy-oriented learning,’ in Paul Sabatier and Hank Jenkins-Smith, eds.Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 41–58.
Jenkins-Smith, Hank and Gilbert St. Clair (1993). ‘The politics of offshore energy: empirically testing the advocacy coalition framework,’ in Paul Sabatier and Hank Jenkins-Smith, eds.Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 149–176.
Jones, Bryan (1994). Book Review ofPolicy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach, edited by Paul Sabatier and Hank Jenkins-Smith.Policy Currents 4 (1): 10.
Keohane, Robert (1984).After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Keohane, Robert (1986). ‘Reciprocity in international relations.’International Organization 40: 1–27.
Komesar, Neil (1994).Imperfect alternatives: Choosing institutions in law, economics, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Laumann, Edward and David Knoke (1987).The Organizational State. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Lowi, Theodore (1964). ‘American business, public policy, case studies, and political theory.’World Politics 15: 677–715.
Lowi, Theodore (1972). ‘Four systems of policy, politics, and choice.’Public Administration Review 32 (4): 298–310.
Marin, Bernd and Renate Mayntz, eds. (1991).Policy Networks: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Considerations. Boulder: Westview Press.
Marsh, David and R. A. W. Rhodes, eds. (1992).Policy Networks in British Government. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
McCay, Bonnie, Richard Apostle, Carolyn Creed, Alan Finlayson, and Knut Mikalsen (1994). ‘Privatization in fisheries: Lessons from experiences in the U.S., Canada, and Norway,’ a paper presented at the Symposium of the Ocean Governance Study Group, ‘Moving ahead on ocean governance: Practical applications guided by long-range vision,’ Lewes, Delaware, April 9–13.
Messick, David (1992). ‘Equality as a decision heuristic.’ Working Paper No. 85. The Dispute Resolution Research Center, J.L. Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
Messick, David and Terry Schell (1992). ‘Evidence for an equality heuristic in social decision making.’ Working Paper No. 83. The Dispute Resolution Research Center, J.L. Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
Moe, Terry (1979). ‘On the scientific status of rational models.’American Journal of Political Science 23: 215–243.
Moe, Terry (1984). ‘The new economics of organization.’American Journal of Political Science 28 (4): 739.
Moe, Terry (1990a). ‘The politics of structural choice: toward a theory of public bureaucracy,’ in Oliver Williamson, ed.Organization Theory: From Chester Barnard to the Present and Beyond. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 116–153.
Moe, Terry (1990b). ‘Political institutions: the neglected side of the story.’Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 6: 213–253.
Olson, Mancur (1965).The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Orbell, John and Robyn Dawes (1991). ‘A cognitive miser' theory of cooperators' advantage,’American Political Science Review 85 (2): 515–528.
Orbell, John, Alphons van de Kragt, and Robyn Dawes (1988). ‘Explaining discussion-induced cooperation.’Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54 (5): 811–819.
Ostrom, Elinor (1990).Governing the Commons. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ostrom, Elinor (1991). ‘A framework for institutional analysis.’ Working Paper, Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.
Ostrom, Elinor, Roy Gardner, and James Walker (1994).Rules, Games and Common Pool Resources. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Ostrom, Elinor, James Walker, and Roy Gardner (1992). ‘Covenants with and without the sword: self-governance is possible.’American Political Science Review 86: 404–417.
Quirk, Paul (1988). ‘In defense of the politics of ideas.’Journal of Politics 50: 31–41.
Rosenbaum, Ron (1991). ‘The brady offensive.’Vanity Fair (January): 66–72, 115–118.
Sabatier, Paul (1988). ‘An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein.’Policy Sciences 21: 129–168.
Sabatier, Paul (1991). ‘Toward better theories of the policy process.’PS: Political Science and Politics 24 (2): 147–156.
Sabatier, Paul (1993). ‘Policy change over a decade or more,’ in Paul Sabatier and Hank Jenkins-Smith, eds.Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 13–39.
Sabatier, Paul and Anne Brasher (1993). ‘From vague consensus to clearly differentiated coalitions: environmental policy at Lake Tahoe, 1964–1985,’ in Paul Sabatier and Hank Jenkins-Smith, eds.Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder: West-view Press, pp. 177–210.
Sabatier, Paul and Hank Jenkins-Smith (1993a). ‘The advocacy coalition framework: assessment, revisions, and implications for scholars and practitioners,’ in Paul Sabatier and Hank Jenkins-Smith, eds.Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 211–235.
Sabatier, Paul and Hank Jenkins-Smith, eds. (1993b).Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder: Westview Press.
Sabatier, Paul and Matthew Zafonte (1994a). ‘Who do policy elites look to for advice and information? Policy networks in San Francisco Bay/Delta Water Policy,’ a paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, New York, Sept. 1–4.
Sabatier, Paul and Matthew Zafonte (1994b). ‘Are bureaucrats and scientists neutral? Two models applied to San Francisco Bay/Delta Water Policy,’ a paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Political Science Association, Berlin, Germany, August 23–26.
Schlager, Edella (1994). ‘Collective action and coalition formation among organized interests, a paper prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, The New York Hilton, September 1–4.
Schlager, Edella and Elinor Ostrom (1992). ‘Common property and natural resources: a conceptual analysis.’Land Economics 68 (3): 249–252.
Schneider, Anne, and Helen Ingram (1993). ‘Social construction of target populations: implications for politics and policy.’American Political Science Review 87: 334–347.
Shepsle, Kenneth and Barry Weingast (1987). ‘The institutional foundations of committee power.’American Political Science Review 81: 85–104.
Simon, Herbert (1985). ‘Human nature in politics: the dialogue of psychology with political science.’American Political Science Review 79 (2): 293–304.
Stein, Robert and Kenneth Bickers (1994). ‘Universalism and the electoral connection: a test and some doubts.’Political Research Quarterly 47 (2): 295–318.
Weingast, Barry and William Marshall (1988). ‘The industrial organization of congress.’Journal of Political Economy 96: 132–163.
Woods, B. Dan and William West (1993). ‘The politics of administrative design: legislative coalitions and the bureaucracy,’ a paper prepared for the American Political Science Meeting, Washington, D.C. September 1–4.
About this article
Cite this article
Schlager, E. Policy making and collective action: Defining coalitions within the advocacy coalition framework. Policy Sci 28, 243–270 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01000289
- Policy Making
- Economic Policy
- Collective Action
- Modern Society
- Recent Effort