Advertisement

Neophilologus

, Volume 77, Issue 2, pp 229–241 | Cite as

Pepita Jiménez and the “fortunate fall” theme

  • Kevin S. Larsen
Articles
  • 63 Downloads

Keywords

Comparative Literature Historical Linguistic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Works Cited

  1. Alas, Leopoldo.Solos de Clarín. Madrid: Alianza Editorial. 1971.Google Scholar
  2. Aza~na, Manuel.Ensayos sobre Valera. Madrid: Alianza Editorial, 1971.Google Scholar
  3. Barbera, Raymond E., “Medieval Iconography inLa Celestina.”Romanic Review 61 (1970): 5–13.Google Scholar
  4. Barja, César.Libros y autoresmodernos. New York: Las Américas, 1964.Google Scholar
  5. Bauer, Beth Weitelmann. “Novels in Dialogue:Pepita Jiménez andLa Regenta.”Revista de Estudios Hispánicos (Vassar) 25 (1991): 103–21.Google Scholar
  6. Benet, Diana. “Satan, God's Glory and the Fortunate Fall.”Milton Quarterly 19 (1985): 34–37.Google Scholar
  7. Biedler, Peter G. “Theme of the Fortunate Fall inThe Marble Faun.”Emerson Society Quarterly 47 (1967): 56–62.Google Scholar
  8. Bravo-Villasante, Carmen.Vida de Juan Valera. Madrid: E.M.E.S.A., 1974.Google Scholar
  9. Cammarata, Joan. “Luis de Vargas: An Oedipal Figure inPepita Jiménez.”The Analysis of Hispanic Texts: Current Trends in Methodology. Eds. Lisa E. Davis and Isabel C. Taran. Jamaica. NY: Bilingual Press, 1976: 206–25.Google Scholar
  10. Chamberlin, Vernon A. “Doňa Perfecta: Galdos' Reply toPepita Jiménez.”Anales Galdosianos 15 (1980): 11–21.Google Scholar
  11. Charnon-Deutsch, Lou. “Gender-Specific Roles inPepita Jiménez.”Revista de Estudios Hispánicos 19 (1985): 87–105.Google Scholar
  12. Cre∪, Ion. “Pepita Jiménez — Novela de la mediación.”Cahiers Roumains d'Études Littéraires 2 (1987): 135–42.Google Scholar
  13. Danielson, Dennis Richard.Milton's Good God. Cambridge: Cambridge U P, 1982.Google Scholar
  14. Díaz Peterson, Rosendo. “Pepita Jiménez, de Juan Valera, o la vuelta al mundo de los sentidos.”Arbor 90 (1975): 39–50.Google Scholar
  15. Doudna, Martin K. “Hawthorne's Pandora, Milton's Eve, and the Fortunate Fall.”Emerson Society Quarterly 31 (1985): 164–72.Google Scholar
  16. Ellis, James. “Human Sexuality, the Sacrament of Matrimony, and the Paradox of the Fortunate Fall inThe Scarlet Letter.”Christianity and Literature 29 (1980): 53–60.Google Scholar
  17. Feal, Carlos. “Pepita Jiménez o del misticismo al idilio.”Bulletin Hispanique 86 (1984): 473–83.Google Scholar
  18. Fishtine, Edith,Don Juan Valera, the Critic. Menasha, WI: George Banta Co., 1933.Google Scholar
  19. Garabedian, Martha Ann. “La mano de Pepita Jiménez.”The American Hispanist 4 (1979), 30–33.Google Scholar
  20. García Cruz, Arturo.Ideología y vivencias en la obra de Don Juan Valera. Salamanca: Ediciones U de Salamanca, 1968.Google Scholar
  21. García Sarriá, Francisco.Clarín o la herejía amorosa. Madrid: Gredos, 1975.Google Scholar
  22. Gardella, Peter.Innocent Ecstasy. Oxford, New York: Oxford U P, 1985.Google Scholar
  23. Gilman, Stephen. “La caída de Fortuna: De la alegoría a la ficción.” Trans. Maria Rico.La Celestina: arte y estructura. Madrid: Taurus, 1974: 381–99.Google Scholar
  24. Gómez Marín, José Antonio.Aproximaciones al realismo español. Madrid: Castellote, 1975.Google Scholar
  25. González López, Luis.Las mujeres de don Juan Valera. Madrid, Barcelona: Espasa-Calpe, 1934.Google Scholar
  26. Haines, Victor Yelverton.The Fortunate Fall of Sir Gawain. Washington, DC: U Press of America, 1982.Google Scholar
  27. Jiménez Fraud, Alberto.Juan Valera y la generación de 1868. Madrid: Taurus, 1973.Google Scholar
  28. Klein, Carol E. “Feminine Forces in the Major Works of Juan Valera.”Publications of the Missouri Philological Association (1984): 37–54.Google Scholar
  29. Krynen, Jean. “Juan Valera et la mystique espagnole.”Bulletin Hispanique 46 (1944): 35–72.Google Scholar
  30. Krynen, Jean.L'Esthétisme de Juan Valera. Salamanca: U de Salamanca, 1946.Google Scholar
  31. Lieb, Michael.The Dialectics of Creation. Amherst: U Massachusetts P, 1970.Google Scholar
  32. López Jiménez, Luis.El naturalismo y España: Valera frente a Zola. Madrid: Alhambra, 1977.Google Scholar
  33. Lott, Robert E.Language and Psychology in ‘Pepita Jiménez. Urbana, Chicago: U Illinois P, 1970.Google Scholar
  34. Lovejoy, Arthur O. “Milton and the Paradox of the Fortunate Fall.”Essays in the History of Ideas. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins U P, 1948: 277–95.Google Scholar
  35. MacCurdy, G. Grant. “Mysticism, Love and Illumination inPepita Jiménez,”Revista de Estudios Hispánicos 17 (1983): 323–34.Google Scholar
  36. Márquez Villanueva, Francisco.Lope: Vida y valores. Río Piedras: U Puerto Rico, 1988.Google Scholar
  37. Martin, June Hall.Love's Fools: Aucassin, Troilis, Calisto and the Parody of the Courtly Lover. London: Tamesis, 1972.Google Scholar
  38. Martín Gaite, Carmen. “Mi relectura dePepita Jiménez.”Pepita Jiménez. Madrid: Taurus, 1979: 9–25.Google Scholar
  39. Mollenkott, Virginia R. “Milton's Rejection of the Fortunate Fall.”Milton Quarterly 6 (1972): 1–5.Google Scholar
  40. Montesinos, José F.Valera o la ficción libre. Madrid: Castalia, 1970.Google Scholar
  41. Olaguín, Manuel. “Juan Valera's Theory of Art for Art's Sake.”Modern Language Forum 35 (1950): 24–34.Google Scholar
  42. Palomo, María del Pilar. “Pepita Jiménez.”Juan Valera. Ed. Enrique Rubio Cremades. Madrid: Taurus, 1990: 276–97.Google Scholar
  43. Palumbo, Donald. “The Theme of the Fortunate Fall in Dostoyevsky'sThe Brothers Karamazov: Effective Counter-argument of Ivan's Ambivalent Atheism.”CEA Critic 43 (1981): 8–12.Google Scholar
  44. Pérez de Ayala, Ramón.Divagaciones literarias. Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva, 1958.Google Scholar
  45. Pérez Gutiérrez, Francisco.El problema religioso en la generación de 1868. Madrid: Taurus, 1975.Google Scholar
  46. Pörtl, Klaus. “Juan Valera,Pepita Jiménez.”Der Spanische Roman vom Mittelalter bis zur Gegenwart. Eds. Volker Roloff and Harald Wentzlaff-Eggebert. Düsseldorf: Schwann Bagel, 1986: 215–30.Google Scholar
  47. Rodríguez, Rodney T. “Icarus Reborn: Mythical Patterns inPepita Jiménez.”Revista de Estudios Hispánicos 19 (1985): 75–85.Google Scholar
  48. Rupe, Carol J.La dialéctica del amor en la narrativa de Juan Valera. Madrid: Pliegos, 1986.Google Scholar
  49. Thurston-Griswold, Henry.El idealismo sintético de don Juan Valera: teoría y práctica. Potomac, MD: Scripta Humanistica, 1990.Google Scholar
  50. Tierno Galván, Enrique.Idealismo y pragmatismo en el XIX español. Madrid: Tecnos, 1977.Google Scholar
  51. Turner, Harriet S. “Nescit labi virtus: Authorial Self-Critique inPepita Jiménez.”Romance Quarterly 35 (1988): 347–57.Google Scholar
  52. Ulreich, Jr., John C. “A Paradise Within: The Fortunate Fall inParadise Lost.”Journal of the History of Ideas 32 (1971): 351–66.Google Scholar
  53. Valera, Juan. “Author's Preface to the American Edition.” Trans. M.J. Serrano. New York: Appelton, 1886: iii-xiii.Google Scholar
  54. Valera, Juan.La doctrina del progreso. Vol. 2 ofObras completas. Madrid: Aguilar, 1961: 1393–1428.Google Scholar
  55. Valera, Juan.Pepita Jiménez. Ed. Andrés Amorós. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe, 1986.Google Scholar
  56. Valera, Juan.Pepita Jiménez. Ed. Leonardo Romero. Madrid: Cátedra, 1989.Google Scholar
  57. Valera, Juan.Pepita Jiménez. Ed. Aldolfo Sotelo Vázquez. Barcelona: PPU, 1989.Google Scholar
  58. Valera, Juan, “La psicología del amor.” Vol. 2 ofObras completas. Madrid: Aguilar, 1961: 1573–86.Google Scholar
  59. Valera, Juan.La revolución y la libertad religiosa en España. Madrid: Aguilar, 1958: 780–812.Google Scholar
  60. Valera, Juan.Sobre el arte de escribir novelas. Vol. 2 ofObras completas. Madrid: Aguilar, 1961: 616–704.Google Scholar
  61. Varela Jácome, Benito.Estructuras novelísticas del siglo XIX. Barcelona: Aubí, 1974.Google Scholar
  62. Weinberg, F. M. “Aspects of Symbolism inLa Celestina.”MLN 86 (1971): 136–53.Google Scholar
  63. Weisinger, Herbert.Tragedy and the Paradox of the Fortunate Fall. East Lansing: Michigan State U P: 1953.Google Scholar
  64. Viener, David. “The Secularization of the Fortunate Fall in Keats's ‘The Eve of St. Agnes’.”Keats-Shelley Journal 29 (1980): 120–30.Google Scholar
  65. Whiston, James.Valera: Pepita Jiménez. London: Grant and Cutler, 1977.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin S. Larsen
    • 1
  1. 1.University of WyomingUSA

Personalised recommendations