Skip to main content

Nonverbal expressiveness and physical attractiveness as mediators of interpersonal perceptions

Abstract

This research examines the impact of spontaneous nonverbal expressiveness and physical attractiveness on the formation of initial interpersonal impressions. It was hypothesized that in the absence of a relationship history with a person, those people who provide more spontaneous, uncensored, nonverbal information would be viewed as more interpersonally attractive. In addition, as a secondary focus of the study, data were analyzed to examine the relationship between physical attractiveness and nonverbal communication abilities. Results suggest that both physical attractiveness and nonverbal expressiveness independent of one another and in conjunction with one another positively impact on interpersonal perceptions. In addition, physical attractiveness was found to positively covary with nonverbal encoding accuracy but negatively covary with nonverbal decoding abilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Adams, G.R. Physical attractiveness research: Toward a developmental social psychology of beauty.Human Development, 20, 217–239.

  2. Argyle, M.Bodily Communication. London: Methuen, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bayes, M.A. Behavioral cues of interpersonal warmth.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1972,29, 333–339.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berscheid, E. & Walster, E. Physical attractiveness. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 6. NY: Academic Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brideau, L.B. & Allen, V.L. Individual differences in nonverbal communication: Facial and vocal encoding.Wisconsin Research and Development Center for Individualized Schooling, Technical Report No. 567, 1980.

  6. Buck, R. The evolution and development of emotion expression and communication. In S. Brehm, S. Kassin, and F. Gibbons (Eds.),Developmental social psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Buck, R. Individual differences in nonverbal sending accuracy and electrodermal responding: The externalizing-internalizing dimension. In R. Rosenthal (Ed.),Skill in nonverbal communication: Individual differences. Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn, & Hain, 1979a.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Buck, R. Measuring individual differences in the nonverbal communication of affect.Human Communication Research, 1979b,6, 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Buck, R. A test of nonverbal receiving ability: Preliminary studies.Human Communication Research, 1976,2, 162–171.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Buck, R., Miller, R.E. & Caul, W. F. Sex, personality, and physiological variables in the communication of emotion via facial expression.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974,30, 587–596.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Buck, R., Savin, V.J., Miller, R.E., & Caul, W.F. Nonverbal communication of affect in humans.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972,23, 362–371.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ekman, R., & Friesen, W.V. Detecting deceptions from the body or face.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974,29, 288–298.

    Google Scholar 

  13. LaCrosse, M.B. Nonverbal behavior and perceived counselor attractiveness and persuasiveness.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1975,22, 563–566.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Larrance, D.T. & Zuckerman, M. Facial attractiveness and vocal likeability as determinants of nonverbal sending skills.Journal of Personality, 1981,49, 349–362.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Poling, T.H. Sex differences, dominance, and physical attractiveness in the use of nonverbal emblems.Psychological Reports, 1978,43, 1087–1092.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Reis, H.T., Wheeler, L., Speigel, N., Kernis, M.H., Nezlek, J., & Perri, M. Physical attractiveness in social interaction: II. Why does appearance affect social experience.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982,40, 979–996.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sabatelli, R.M., Buck, R., & Dreyer, A. Nonverbal communication accuracy in married couples: Relationship with marital complaints.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982,43, 1088–1097.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Strong, S.R., Taylor, R.G., Bratton, J.C., & Loper, R.G. Nonverbal behavior and perceived counselor characteristics.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1971,18, 554–561.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shrout, P.E. & Fiske, D.W. Nonverbal behaviors and social evaluations.Journal of Personality, 1981,49, 115–128.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zuckerman, M., Hall, J.A., DeFrank, R.S., & Rosenthal, R. Encoding and decoding of spontaneous and posed facial expressions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976,34, 966–977.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald M. Sabatelli.

Additional information

The authors wish to express their appreciation to Ross Buck and Robert Ryder for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of the paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sabatelli, R.M., Rubin, M. Nonverbal expressiveness and physical attractiveness as mediators of interpersonal perceptions. J Nonverbal Behav 10, 120–133 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01000008

Download citation

Keywords

  • Social Psychology
  • Nonverbal Communication
  • Physical Attractiveness
  • Communication Ability
  • Relationship History