Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Who gains, who loses from changing U.S. child support policies?

  • Published:
Policy Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines the empirical and theoretical research on child support policies to assess the effects of recent changes on the well-being of women, men, and children. In addition to considering the intra-family and inter-family distributional effects of child support payments across gender, race, and income categories, the essay explores several criteria central to a feminist cost-benefit analysis. Thus, recent changes in child support policies are analyzed in relation to the prevention of poverty, the reduction of women's economic dependence on men, and the reduction of gender inequalities in income and leisure time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, Charles F., David Landsbergen and Larry Cobler (1992). ‘Welfare reform and paternity establishment: A social experiment,’Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 11: 665–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arditti, Joyce A. (1991). ‘Child support noncompliance and divorced fathers: Rethinking the role of paternal involvement,’Journal of Divorce and Remarriage 14: 107–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argys, Laura M. and H. Elizabeth Peters (1993). ‘The role of child support guidelines in the negotiation of child support awards,’Population Association of America, Cincinnati, OH, April.

  • Bassi, Lauri J. and Burt S. Barnow (1991). ‘Expenditures on children and child support guidelines,’ Unpublished manuscript.

  • Becker, Gary S. (1981).Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Mary E. (1989). ‘The rights of unwed parents: Feminist approaches,’Social Services Review 63: 496–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beller, Andrea H. and John W. Graham (1985). ‘Variations in the economic well-being of divorced women and their children: The role of child support income,’ in David Martin and Timothy Smeeding, eds.Horizontal Equity, Uncertainty, and Economic Well-Being. Chicago, IL: New Berry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beller, Andrea H. and John W. Graham (1988). ‘Child support payments: Evidence from repeated cross sections,’American Economic Review 78: 81–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beller, Andrea H. and John Graham (1991). ‘The effect of child support enforcement on child support payments,’Population Research and Policy Review 10: 91–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beller, Andrea H. and D. Elizabeth Kiss (1993). ‘Child support guidelines and incentives for mother's work: An exploratory analysis,’ Unpublished manuscript.

  • Bergmann, Barbara R. and Roberts Mark D. (1987). ‘Income for the Single Parent: Child Support, Work, and Welfare,’ in Clair Brown and Joseph A. Pechman, eds.Gender in the Work-place. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institute, pp. 247–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betson, David, Eirik Evenhouse, Sibohan Reilly and Eugene Smolensky (1992). ‘Trade-offs implicit in child support guidelines,’Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 11: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaydon, Colin C. and Carol B. Stack (1977). ‘Income support policies and the family,’Daedalus 106: 147–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassetty, Judith (1978).Child Support and Public Policy: Securing Support from Absent Fathers. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, David (1979).Making Fathers Pay: The Enforcement of Child Support. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ChildNet Update (1994). Washington DC: National Campaign for Child Support Enforcement and Assurance, March.

  • Chira, Susan (1994). ‘Novel idea in welfare plan: Helping children by helping their fathers,’New York Times March 30, p. A10.

  • Christensen, Donna Hendrickson, Carla M. Dahl and Kathryn D. Rettig (1990). ‘Noncustodial mothers and child support: Examining the larger context,’Family Relations 39: 388–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, Tom, Irwin Garfinkel and Nora Schaeffer (1988). ‘Public opinion about a child support system,’Social Service Review 62: 632–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, Sandra K. and Ann Nichols-Casebolt (1990). ‘Child support in paternity cases,’Social Service Review 64: 458–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dapner, Charlene E. and James H. Bray (1990). ‘Modes of participation for noncustodial parents: The challenge for research, policy, practice, and education,’Family Relations 39: 378–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley, James R. (1991). ‘Exploring ways to get divorced fathers to comply willingly with child support agreements,’Journal of Divorce and Remarriage 14: 121–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, Greg J. and Saul D. Hoffman (1985). ‘Economic consequences of marital instability,’ in Martin David and Tim Smeeding, eds.Horizontal Equity, Uncertainty, and Economic Well-Being. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 427–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • England, Paula and Barbara Stanek Kilbourne (1990). ‘Markets, marriages, and other mates: The problem of power,’ in Roger Friedland and G. F. Robertson, eds.Beyond the Marketplace. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, pp. 163–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, Kathy E. (1983). ‘Bureaucracy and public life: The feminization of the policy,’Administration and Society 15 (3): 295–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreiro, Beverly Webster (1990). ‘Presumption of joint custody: A family policy dilemma,’Family Relations 39: 420–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fineman, Martha Albertson (1991).The Illusion of Equality: The Rhetoric and Reality of Divorce Reform Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, Nancy (1993). ‘After the family wage: What do women want in social welfare?’ Unpublished Manuscript.

  • Fraser, Nancy and Linda Gordon (1994). ‘A genealogy of dependency: Tracing a keyword of the U.S. welfare state,’Signs 19 (2): 309–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, Victor (1988).Women's Quest for Economic Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, Irwin (1992).Assuring Child Support. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, Irwin and Marieka M. Klawitter (1990). ‘The effect of routine income withholding on child support collections,’Journal of Public Policy and Management 9: 155–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, Irwin and Sara McLanahan (1986).Single Mothers and Their Children: A New American Dilemma? Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, Irwin, Daniel R. Meyer and Gary D. Sandefur (1992). ‘The effects of alternative child support systems on Blacks, Hispanics, and non-Hispanic Whites,’Social Service Review 66: 505–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, Irwin, Donald Oellerich and Philip K. Robins (1991). ‘Child support guidelines: Will they make a difference?’Journal of Family Issues 12: 404–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, John W. (1990). ‘Child support and mother's employment,’Contemporary Policy Issues 8: 95–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, John W. and Andrea H. Beller (1989). ‘The effect of child support payments on the labor supply of female family heads,’Journal of Human Resources 24: 664–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, Arlie (1989).The Second Shift. New York: Avon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, David L., Mark G. Yudof, and Marlene Strong Franks (1986).Gender Justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klawitter, Marieka M. (1994). ‘Child support awards and the earnings of divorced noncustodial fathers.’Social Science Review 68(3): 351–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klawitter, Marieka M. and Irwin Garfinkel (1992a). ‘Child support, routine income withholding, and post-divorce income,’Contemporary Policy Issues 10: 52–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klawitter, Marieka M. and Irwin Garfinkel (1992b). ‘The effects of routine income withholding of child support on AFDC participation and costs,’ in Irwin Garfinkel, Sara S. McLanahan and Philip K. Robins, eds.Child Support Assurance: Design Issues, Expected Impacts, and Political Barriers as Seen from Wisconsin. Washington D.C.: The Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, Harry D. (1989). ‘Child support reassessed: Limits of private responsibility and the public interest,’University of Illinois Law Review 1989: 367–398.

  • Laqueur, Thomas W. (1992). ‘The facts of fatherhood,’ in Barrie Thorne and Marilyn Yalom, eds.Rethinking the Family. Boston MA: Northeastern University Press, rev. ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazear, Edward P. and Michael, Robert T. (1988).Allocation of Income Within the Household. Chicago: Univesity of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, Robert I. (1989). ‘Child support policies,’ in P. H. Cottingham and D. T. Ellwood, eds.Welfare Policy for the 1990s. Cambridge: MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lommerud, Kjell Erik (1989). ‘Marital division of labor with risk of divorce: The role of “voice” enforcement contracts,’Journal of Labor Economics 7: 113–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manser, Marilyn and Murray Brown (1979). ‘Bargaining analyses of household decision,’ in C. B. Lloyd, E. S. Andrews and C. L. Gilroy, eds.Women in the Labor Market. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McElroy, M. B. (1990). ‘The empirical content of Nash-bargained household behavior,’The Journal of Human Resources 25: 559–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • McElroy, M. B. and M. J. Horney (1981). ‘Nash-bargained household decisions: Toward a generalization of the theory of demand,’International Economic Review 22: 333–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, Daniel R. (1993). ‘Child support and welfare dynamics: Evidence from Wisconsin,’Demography 30: 45–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, Daniel R. and Steven Garasky (1993). ‘Custodial fathers: Myths, realities, and child support policy,’Journal of Marriage and the Family 55: 73–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munsterman, Janice T., Claire B. Grimm, Thomas A. Henderson and H. Clifton Grandy (1991). ‘Child support guidelines: Facing modification and custody issues,’State Court Journal 15: 41–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols-Casebolt, Ann (1986). ‘The economic impact of child support reform on the poverty status of custodial and noncustodial families,’Journal of Marriage and the Family 48: 875–880.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols-Casebolt, Ann and Irwin Garfinkel (1989). ‘Trends in paternity adjudications and child support awards.’ Discussion paper 879–89. University of Wisconsin at Madison: Institute for Research on Poverty.

  • O'Donnell, Harry B. (1990). ‘Title I of the Family Support Act of 1988 — The quest for effective national child support guidelines,’Journal of Family Law 29: 149–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okin, Susan M. (1989).Justice, Gender, and the Family. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ollerich, Donald, Irwin Garfinkel and Philip K. Robins (1989). ‘Private child support: Current and potential impacts.’ Discussion paper (888–89). University of Wisconsin at Madison: Institute for Research on Poverty.

  • Parents Opposed to Punitive Support (1993). Brochure.

  • Pearson, Jessica and Nancy Thoennes (1985). ‘Child custody, child support arrangements, and child support payment patterns,’Juvenile and Family Court Journal 36: 49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, Jessica and Nancy Thoennes (1988). ‘Supporting children after divorce: The influence of custody on support levels and payments,’Family Law Quarterly 22: 319–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, H. Elizabeth and Laura Argys (1991). ‘Child support awards and compliance: Evidence from California and Arizona.’ Unpublished Manuscript.

  • Peterson, James L. and Christine Winquist Nord (1990). ‘The regular receipt of child support: A multistep process,’Journal of Marriage and the Family 52: 539–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Elizabeth and Irwin Garfinkel (1992).Changes Over Time in the Incomes of Nonresident Fathers in Wisconsin. Discussion paper (967–92). University of Wisconsin at Madison: Institute for Research on Poverty.

  • Ries, Paula and Anne J. Stone, eds. (1992).The American Woman 1992–93: A Status Report. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins, Philip K. (1986). ‘Child support welfare dependency and poverty,’The American Economic Review 76: 768–788.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins, Philip K. (1992). ‘Why did child support award levels decline from 1978 to 1985?’Journal of Human Resources 27: 362–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapiro, Virginia (1990). ‘The Gender Basis of American Social Policy.’ Pp. 36–54 in Linda Gordon, ed.Women, the State, and Welfare. Madison WI: The University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 36–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawhill, Isabel (1975).Time of Transition: The Growth of Families Headed by Women. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer, Nora Cate (1990). ‘Principles of justice in judgements about child support,’Social Forces 69: 157–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seltzer, Judith A. (1990). ‘Legal custody arrangements and the intergenerational transmission of economic welfare.’ Discussion paper. University of Wisconsin at Madison: Institute for Research on Poverty.

  • Seltzer, Judith A., Nora Cate Schaeffer and Hong Wen Charng (1989). ‘Family ties after divorce: The relationship between visiting and paying child support,’Journal of Marriage and the Family 51: 1013–1031.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smock, Pamela J. (1993). ‘The economic costs of marital disruption for young women over the past two decades,’Demography 30: 353–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonenstein, Freya L. and Charles A. Calhoun (1990). ‘Determinants of child support: A pilot survey of absent parents,’Contemporary Policy Issues 8: 75–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teachman, Jay D. (1990). ‘Socioeconomic resources of parents and awards of child support in the United States: Some exploratory models,’Journal of Marriage and the Family 52: 689–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teachman, Jay D. (1991). ‘Who pays? Receipt of child support in the United States,’Journal of Marriage and the Family 53: 759–772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoennes, Nancy, Patricia Tjaden and Jessica Pearson (1991). ‘The impact of child support guidelines on award adequacy, awards variability, and case processing efficiency,’Family Law Quarterly 25: 325–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Ways and Means (1993).Background Material and Data on Programs Within the Jurisdiction of the Committee on Ways and Means. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veum, Jonathan R. (1993). ‘The effects of child support and visitation on marital status.’ Unpublished manuscript.

  • Weiss, Yoram and Robert J. Willis (1985). ‘Children as collective goods and divorce settlements,’Journal of Labor Economics 3: 268–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, Lenore J. (1985).The Divorce Revolution: The Unexpected Social and Economic Consequences for Women and Children in America. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Women's Advocate (1994). ‘HHS issues proposed regulations on paternity establishment’ 15 (1): 1, 3, 4, 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yee, Lucy Marsh (1979). ‘What really happens in child support cases: An empirical study of establishment and enforcement of child support orders in the Denver District Court,’Denver Law Journal 57: 21–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yun, Kwi Ryung (1902). ‘Effects of child support on remarriage of single mothers, in Irwin Garfinkel, Sara S. McLanahan and Philip K. Robins, eds.Child Support Assurance: Design Issues, Expected Impacts, and Political Barriers as Seen from Wisconsin. Washington D.C.: The Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate School of Public Affairs, University of Washington, 98195, Seattle, WA, USA

    Marieka M. Klawitter

Authors
  1. Marieka M. Klawitter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klawitter, M.M. Who gains, who loses from changing U.S. child support policies?. Policy Sci 27, 197–219 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999888

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999888

Keywords

Search

Navigation