Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Expanding the discursive context of policy design: A matter of feminist standpoint epistemology

  • Published:
Policy Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While recent elaborations of policy design have been innovative and intriguing, feminist analysis remains unacknowledged. The exclusion of feminist analysis confounds policy design's goal of increased sensitivity to context, values, and audience. I use feminist standpoint epistemology to illustrate and expand the dialogue of policy design as well as policy analysis generally. Addressing policy analysis from a meta-perspective facilitates a discussion of theory. methodology, and practice. The applicative aspects of the feminist epistemic stance are illustrated via a hypothetical case study addressing the environmental problematique. As such, a feminist standpoint reformulation of policy design is proffered. Overall, the analysis expands the theoretical construction of policy design, providing an increased potential for participatory policy analysis and a bridge between two discourses previously lacking interchange.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acker, Joan, Kate Barry, and Johanna Esseveld (1991). ‘Objectivity and truth: Problems in doing feminist research,’ in Mary Margaret Fonow and Judith A. Cook, eds.,Beyond Methodology: Feminist Scholarship as Lived Research. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, pp. 133–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcoff, Linda and Elizabeth Potter, eds. (1993).Feminist Epistemologies. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobrow, Davis B. and John S. Dryzek (1987).Policy Analysis By Design. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bührs, Ton and Robert V. Bartlett (1993).Environmental Policy in New Zealand: The Politics of Clean and Green? Auckland: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Susan E. and Lyn Kathlene (1992). ‘Women as political actors and policy analysis,’ a paper presented at the annual meetings of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, Denver, October 29–31.

  • Code, Lorraine (1993). ‘Taking subjectivity into account,’ in Linda Alcoff and Elizabeth Potter, eds.,Feminist Epistemologies. New York: Routledge, pp. 15–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Code, Lorraine (1991).What Can She Know? Feminist Theory and the Construction of Knowledge. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Patricia Hill (1991a). ‘Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of black feminist thought,’ in Mary Margaret Fonow and Judith A. Cook, eds.,Beyond Methodology: Feminist Scholarship as Lived Research. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, pp. 35–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Patricia Hill (1991b).Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Poltics of Empowerment. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, Ned, Janey Kelley, and Paul Shaefer (1986). ‘Citizenship panels: A new approach to citizen participation,’Public Administration Review 46: 170–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • deLeon, Peter (1988–89). ‘The contextual burdens of policy design,’Policy Studies Journal 17: 297–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • deLeon, Peter (1992). ‘The democratization of the policy sciences.’Public Administration Review 52: 125–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devault, Marjorie L. (1990). ‘Talking and listening from women's standpoint: Feminist strategies for interviewing and analysis,’Social Problems 37: 96–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diesing, Paul (1991).How Does Social Science Work?: Reflections on Practice. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diesing, Paul (1982).Science and Ideology in the Policy Sciences. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiSanto, Ronald L. and Thomas J. Steele (1990).Guidebook to Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance. New York: William Morrow and Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, John S. (1983). ‘Don't toss coins into garbage cans: A prologue to policy design,’Journal of Public Policy 3: 345–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flax, Jane (1983). ‘Political philosophy and the patriarchal unconscious: A psychoanalytic perspective on epistemology and metaphisics,’ in Sandra Harding and Merrill Hintikka, eds.,Discovering Reality. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonow, Mary Margaret and Judith A. Cook, eds. (1991).Beyond Methodology: Feminist Scholarship as Lived Research. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, Judith (1993).Fundamental Feminism: Contesting the Core Concepts of Feminist Theory. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (1984).The Theory of Communicative Action I: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (1973a).Legitimation Crisis. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (1973b).Theory and Practice. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, Donna J. (1991).Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, Sandra (1992). ‘After the neutrality ideal: Science, politics, and “strong objectivity”,’Social Research. 59 (3): 567–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, Sandra (1991).Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?: Thinking From Women's Lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, Sandra (1986).The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartsock, Nancy (1983). ‘The feminist standpoint: Developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism,’ in Sandra Harding and Merrill Hintikka, eds.,Discovering Reality. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkesworth, M. E. (1988).Theoretical Issues in Policy Analysis. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hekman, Susan J. (1990).Gender and Knowledge: Elements of a Postmodern Feminism. Boston, MA: Northeaster University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, Christopher (1986).The Tools of Government. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingraham, Patricia W. (1987). ‘Toward more systematic consideration of policy design,’Journal of Public Policy 15: 611–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayaratne, Toby Epstein and Abigail J. Stewart (1991). ‘Quantitative and qualitative methods in the social sciences: Current feminist issues and practical strategies,’ in Mary Margaret Fonow and Judith A. Cook, eds.,Beyond Methodology: Feminist Scholarship as Lived Research. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kathlene, Lyn and John A. Martin (1993). ‘Enhancing citizen participation: Panel designs, perspectives, and policy formation,’Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 10: 46–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, Harold (1951). ‘The policy orientation,’ in Daniel Lerner and Harold Lasswell, eds.,The Policy Sciences: Recent Developments in Scope and Methods. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, Harold, et al. (1952).The Comparative Study of Symbols. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, Charles E. (1980).The Policy Making Process. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linder, Stephen H. and B. Guy Peters (1989). ‘Instruments of government: Perceptions and contexts,’Journal of Public Policy 9: 35–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linder, Stephen H. and B. Guy Peters (1988). ‘The analysis of design and the design of analysis,’Policy Studies Review 7: 738–750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linder, Stephen H. and B. Guy Peters (1987). ‘A design perspective on policy implementation: The fallacies of misplaced prescription,’Policy Studies Review 6: 459–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linder, Stephen and B. Guy Peters (1984). ‘From social theory to policy design,’Journal of Public Policy 4: 237–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majone, Giandomenico (1989).Evidence, Argument, and Persuasion in the Policy Process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirsig, Robert M. (1974).Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance: An Inquiry Into Values. NY: Bantam Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinharz, Shulamit (1992).Feminist Methods in Social Research. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Hilary (1983). ‘Hand, brain and heart: A feminist epistemology for the natural sciences,’Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 9 (1).

  • Schneider, Anne and Helen Ingram (1993). ‘Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy,”American Political Science Review 87: 334–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Dorothy (1987).The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, Deborah A. (1988).Policy Paradox and Political Reason. Glenville, IL: Scott, Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weimer, David L. (1993). ‘The current state of design craft: Borrowing, tinkering, and problem solving,’Public Administration Review 53: 110–120.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Resource Management, Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand

    Stefanie S. Rixecker

Authors
  1. Stefanie S. Rixecker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rixecker, S.S. Expanding the discursive context of policy design: A matter of feminist standpoint epistemology. Policy Sci 27, 119–142 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999884

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999884

Keywords

Search

Navigation