Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Preschool children's ability to identify and label emotions

Abstract

The present study examined preschoolers' and adults' ability to identify and label the emotions of happiness, sadness, and anger when presented through either the face channel alone, the voice channel alone, or the face and voice channels together. Subjects were also asked to rate the intensity of the expression. The results revealed that children aged three to five years are able to accurately identify and label emotions of happy, sad, and angry regardless of channel presentation. Similar results were obtained for the adult group. While younger children (33 to 53 months of age) were equally accurate in identifying the three emotions, older children (54 to 68 months of age) and adults made more incorrect responses when identifying expressions of sadness. Intensity ratings also differed according to the age of the subject and the emotion being rated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bugental, D.E., Kaswan, J.W., Love, L.R., & Fox, M.N. (1970). Child versus adult perception of evaluative messages in verbal, vocal, and visual channels.Developmental Psychology, 2, 367–375.

  2. Burns, K.L., & Beier, E.G. (1973). Significance of vocal and visual channels in the decoding of emotional meaning.Journal of Communication, 23, 118–130.

  3. Campos, J.J., & Stenberg, C.R. (1978). Perception, appraisal and emotion: The onset of social referencing. In M.E. Lamb & L.R. Sherrod (Eds.),Infant social cognition (pp. 273–314). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Press.

  4. DePaulo, B., & Rosenthal, R. (1979). Age changes in nonverbal decoding skills: Evidence for increasing differentiation.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 25, 145–150.

  5. Diener, E., Larsen, R.J., Levine, S., & Emmons, R.A. (1985). Intensity and frequency: Dimensions underlying positive and negative affect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1253–1265.

  6. Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V., & Ellsworth, P. (1972).Emotion in the human face: Guidelines for research and an integration of findings. New York: Pergamon Press.

  7. Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V., O'Sullivan, M. & Scherer, K. (1980). Relative importance of face, body, and speech in judgements of personality and affect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 270–277.

  8. Ekman, P., & Oster, H. (1982). Review of research: 1970–1980. In P. Ekman (Ed.),Emotions in the human face (pp. 147–173). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

  9. Felleman, E.S., Barden, R.C., Carlson, C.R., Rosenberg, L., & Masters, J.C. (1983). Children's and adults' recognition of spontaneous and posed emotional expressions in young children.Developmental Psychology, 19, 405–413.

  10. Field, T., & Walden, T. (1982). Production and discrimination of facial expressions by preschool children.Child Development, 53, 1299–1311.

  11. Fox, N.A., & Davidson, R.J. (1984). Hemispheric substrates of affect: A developmental model. In N.A. Fox & R.J. Davidson (Eds.),The psychobiology of affective development (pp. 353–382). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Press.

  12. Harrigan, J.A. (1984). The effects of task order on children's identification of facial expressions.Motivation and Emotion, 8, 157–169.

  13. Izard, C.D. (1977).Human emotions. New York: Plenum Press.

  14. Kraus, R.M., Apple, W., Moreney, N., Wenzel, C. & Winston, W. (1981). Verbal, vocal, and visible factors in judgments of another's affect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 312–320.

  15. Levitt, E.A. (1964). The relationship between abilities to express emotional meaning vocally and facially. In J.R. Davitz (Ed.),The communication of emotional meaning (pp. 87–100). New York: McGraw-Hill.

  16. Mann, V.A., Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1979). Development of voice recognition: Parallels with face recognition.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 27, 153–165.

  17. Mehrabian, A., & Ferris, S.R. (1967). Inference of attitudes from nonverbal communication in two channels.Journal of Consulting Psychology, 31, 248–252.

  18. Odom, R.D., & Lemond, C.M. (1972). Developmental differences in the perception and production of facial expressions.Child Development, 43, 359–369.

  19. O'Sullivan, M., Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V., & Scherer, K. (1985). What you say and how you say it. The contribution of speech content and voice quality to judgment of others.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 54–62.

  20. Plutchick, R. (1962).The emotions: Facts, theories and a new model. New York: Random House.

  21. Rosenthal, R., Hall, J.A., DiMatteo, M.R., Rogers, P.L., & Archer, D. (1979).Sensitivity to nonverbal communication: The PONS test. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

  22. Schlosberg, H. (1954). Three dimensions of emotions.Psychological Review, 61, 81–88.

  23. Volkmar, F.R., & Siegel, A.A. (1982). Responses to consistent and discrepant social communications. In R.S. Feldman (Ed.),Development of nonverbal behavior in children (pp. 231–255). New York: Springer-Verlag.

  24. Zuckerman, M., & Przewuzman, S. (1979). Decoding and encoding facial expressions in preschool-age children.Environmental Psychology and Nonverbal Psychology, 3, 147–163.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Cynthia A. Stifter Ph.D..

Additional information

Support for this research was from a grant by the National Science Foundatin (#01523721) to Nathan A. Fox. The authors would like to thank Professor A. Caron for providing the original videotape, Joyce Dinsmoor for her help in data collection and the staff of the Center for Young Children for their cooperation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stifter, C.A., Fox, N.A. Preschool children's ability to identify and label emotions. J Nonverbal Behav 11, 43–54 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999606

Download citation

Keywords

  • Young Child
  • Social Psychology
  • Preschool Child
  • Incorrect Response
  • Intensity Rating