Advertisement

Policy Sciences

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 37–51 | Cite as

Toward a stakeholder-based policy process: An application of the social marketing perspective to environmental policy development

  • John A. Altman
  • Ed PetkusJr.
Article

Abstract

This article suggests that the application of social marketing principles to the public policy process can facilitate the efforts of governmental policy-makers and non-governmental stakeholders to articulate their policy desires and to encourage the adoption and acceptance of particular environmental policies. A conceptual framework is presented, emphasizing both the influence of stakeholders on environmental policy development and the education of stakeholders as to the potential effects of the policy. The purpose of such a conceptualization is to show how social marketing principles can be applied to the public policy process in order to enhance the likelihood of successful policy development and implementation.

Keywords

Public Policy Potential Effect Conceptual Framework Economic Policy Environmental Policy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, James E. (1979).Public Policy Making. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, James E., Brady, David W., and Charles Bullock (1978).Public Policy and Politics in America. North Scituate, MA Duxbury Press.Google Scholar
  3. Arndt, Johan (1978). ‘How broad should the marketing concept be?”Journal of Marketing 42: 101–103.Google Scholar
  4. Assael, Henry (1991).Marketing: Principles and Strategy. Chicago: The Dryden Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bacot, A. Hunter, Fitzgerald, Michael R., and Amy Snyder McCabe (1991). ‘Articulating policy to the public: Challenges for communicating environmental decisions,” a paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southeastern Conference on Public Administration, Charlotte, N.C., October 16–18.Google Scholar
  6. Dye, Thomas R. (1981).Understanding Public Policy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  7. Enis, Ben M. (1973). ‘Deepening the concept of marketing,’Journal of Marketing 37: 57–62.Google Scholar
  8. Geller, E. Scott (1989). ‘Applied behavior analysis and social marketing: An integration for environmental preservation,’Journal of Social Issues 45: 17–36.Google Scholar
  9. Henning, Daniel H. and William R. Mangun (1989).Managing the Environmental Crisis. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hutton, R. Bruce and Olli T. Ahtola (1991). “Consumer response to a five-year campaign to combat air pollution,’Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 10: 242–56.Google Scholar
  11. Ingraham, Patricia W. (1987). ‘Toward more systematic consideration of policy design,”Policy Studies Journal 15: 611–628.Google Scholar
  12. Jones, Charles O. (1977).An Introduction to the Study of Public Policy. Boston: Duxbury Press.Google Scholar
  13. Kingdon, John W. (1984).Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  14. Kotler, Phillip and Sidney J. Levy (1969). ‘Broadening the concept of marketing,’Journal of Marketing 33: 10–15.Google Scholar
  15. Kotler, Phillip (1976).Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, and Control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  16. Kotler, Phillip (1975).Marketing for Nonprofit Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  17. Lindblom, Charles (1980).The Policy Making Process. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  18. Luck, David J. (1969). ‘Broadening the concept of marketing — too far,’Journal of Marketing 33: 53–63.Google Scholar
  19. Opinion Research Corporation (1990). ‘Environmental concerns are resulting in changes in consumer behavior,’ press release, June 28.Google Scholar
  20. Peters, B. Guy (1993).American Public Policy: Promise and Performance. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Petkus, Ed,Jr. and Robert B. Woodruff (1992). ‘A model of the socially-responsible decision-making process in marketing: Linking decision-makers and stakeholders,”American Marketing Association Educators' Proceedings.Google Scholar
  22. Portney, Kent E. (1986).Approaching Public Policy Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  23. Pride, William M and O.C. Ferrell (1991).Marketing: Concepts and Strategies. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
  24. Rosenbaum, Walter A. (1973).The Politics of Environmental Concern. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  25. Smith, Richard A. (1984). ‘Advocacy, interpretation, and influence in the U.S. Congress,’American Political Science Review 78: 44–63.Google Scholar
  26. Starling, Grover (1988).Strategies for Policy Making. Chicago: The Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
  27. Stone, Christopher D. (1974).Should Trees Have Standing? Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects. Los Altos, CA: Kaufmann.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • John A. Altman
    • 1
  • Ed PetkusJr.
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of History and Political ScienceHigh Point UniversityHigh PointUSA
  2. 2.Department of MarketingBoise State UniversityBoiseUSA

Personalised recommendations