Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

New directions in English historical grammar

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Neophilologus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbott, E.A. (1897)A Shakespearian Grammar. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adamson, S.et al. (1990) (eds)Papers from the 5th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aitchison, J. (1981)Language Change: Progress or Decay? Bungay, Suffolk: Fontana Paperbacks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bean, M. (1983)The Development of Word Order Patterns in Old English. London and Totowa, N.J.

  • Boas, H.U. (1975)Syntactic Generalizations and Linear Order in Generative Transformational Grammar. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denison, D. (1990) “Auxiliary + impersonal in Old English”,Folia Linguistica Historica 9: 139–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, R.et al. (1985) (eds)Papers from the 4th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, O.C.M. (1992) “Syntactic change and borrowing: the case of the accusative and infinitive construction in English”, in: D. Stein and M. Gerritsen (eds)Internal and External Factors in Linguistic Change, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 17–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, O.C.M. and F.C. van der Leek (1981) “Optional vs radical re-analysis: mechanisms of syntactic change” (review article of Lightfoot 1979),Lingua 55: 301–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— —— (1987) “A ‘Case’ for the Old English impersonal”, in: W. Koopmanet al. (eds)Explanation and Linguistic Change, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 79–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franz, W. (1909)Die Sprache Shakespeares in Vers und Prosa. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Görlach, M. (1978)Einführung ins Frühneuenglische. Heidelberg: Quelle und Meyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemenade, A. van (1987)Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the History of English. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroch, A.S. (1989) “Function and grammar in the history of English: periphrasticdo”, in: R.W. Fasold and D. Schiffrin (eds)Language Change and Variation, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 133–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labov, W. (1980) (ed.)Locating Language in Time and Space. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightfoot, D.W. (1979)Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1980) “The history of NP movement”, in: T. Hoekstraet al. (eds)Lexical Grammar, Dordrecht: Foris, 255–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milroy, J. (1992)Linguistic Variation and Change. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milroy J. and Milroy L. (1985) “Linguistic change, social network and speaker innovation”,Journal of Linguistics 21: 339–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, B. (1964) “Syntax and word order in thePeterborough Chronicle 1122–1154”,Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 65: 113–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1985)Old English Syntax. Vols.I–II. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mustanoja, T.F. (1960)A Middle English Syntax. Part I. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogura, M. (1986)Historical English Phonology: A Lexical Perspective. Tokyo: Kenkyusha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuter, O. (1938)On Continuative Relative Clauses in English. Helsinki: Societas Scientiarum Fennica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romaine, S. (1982)Socio-historical Linguistics: Its Status and Methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderlind, J. (1951)Verb Syntax in John Dryden's Prose I. Uppsala: A.-B. Lundequistska.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørenson, K. (1957) “Latin influence on English syntax”,Travaux du Cercle Linguistique du Copenhague 11: 131–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockwell, R.P. (1977) “Motivations for exbraciation in Old English”, in: C.N. Li (ed.)Mechanisms of Syntactic Change, London/Austin: University of Texas Press, 291–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traugott, E.C. (1972)A History of English Syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, A.R. (1990) “Reworking the history of English auxiliaries”, in: S. Adamsonet al. (eds) Papers from the 5th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 537–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurff, W. van der (1990) “A remarkable gap in the history of English syntax”,Folia Linguistica Historica 9: 117–159.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Engels Seminarium, University of Amsterdam/HIL, Spuistraat 210, 1012 VT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Olga Fischer

Authors
  1. Olga Fischer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fischer, O. New directions in English historical grammar. Neophilologus 79, 163–182 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999571

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999571

Keywords

Search

Navigation