Skip to main content

Evoking Astraea: The speeches of Marcela and Dorotea inDon Quijote I

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Works cited

  • Berndt Kelley, Erna. “En torno a la ‘maravillosa visión’ de la pastora Marcela y otra ‘fiction poetica’.”Actas del IX congreso de la asociación internacional de hispanistas. Frankfurt: Vervuert Verlag, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernini, Gian.Truth Unveiled. Rome, Villa Borghese.

  • Casalduero, Joaquín.Sentido y forma del Quijote. Madrid: Insula, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervantes, Miguel de,El Ingenioso Hidalgo Don Quijote de la Mancha I. Ed. Luis Andrés Murillo. Madrid: Clásicos Castalia, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicero.De Inventione de Optimo Genere Oratorum Topica. Ed. T. E. Page, Trans. H. M. Hubbell. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Armas, Frederick. “Interpolation and Invisibility: From Herodotus to Cervantes’Don Quijote.”Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts IV.2 (1992) 8–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • --.The Return of Astraea. An Astral-Imperial Myth in Calderón. UP of Kentucky, 1986.

  • De Armas, Wilson, Diana. “Passing the Love of Women: The Intertextuality ofEl curioso impertinente.”Cervantes 2 (Fall 1987): 9–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley, Edward. “Don Quijote as Magus: The Rhetoric of Interpolation.”Bulletin of Hispanic Studies XLIX (1972): 355–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • El Saffar, Ruth.Beyond Fiction. The Recovery of the Feminine in the Novels of Cervantes. Berkeley: U of CP, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——.Distance and Control in Don Quixote:A Study in Narrative Technique. Chapel Hill: North Carolina Studies in the Romance Languages and Literatures, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foa, Sandra M. “María de Zayas y Sotomayor: Sibyl of Madrid (Spanish, 1590?–1661?).”Female Scholars. A Tradition of Learned Women Before 1800. Ed. J. R. Brink. Montreal: Eden P, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genette, Gérard.Narrative Discourse. An Essay in Method. Trans. by Jane E. Lewin. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, Juergan. “El curioso impertinente and Don Quijote's Symbolic Struggle AgainstCuriositas.”Bulletin of Hispanic Studies XLIX (1972): 128–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrero, Javier. “Dulcinea and Her Critics.”Cervantes 2 (1982): 23–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Immerwahr, Raymond. “Structural Symmetry in the Episodic Narratives of Don Quijote, Part One.”Comparative Literature 10 (1958): 121–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKey, Mary. “Rhetoric and Characterization inDon Quijote.”Hispanic Review 42 (1974): 51–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oriel, Charles. “Narrative Levels and the Fictionality ofDon Quijote, I: Cardenio's Story.”Cervantes 10 (1990): 55–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornstein, Jacob. “La misogenia y el profeminismo en la literatura castellana.”Revista de filología hispánica III (1941): 219–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parr, James A. Don Quijote:An Anatomy of Subversive Discourse. Newark, DE: Juan de la Cuesta, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubens, Peter Paul.Triumph of the Eucharist. Madrid, Prado.

  • Saxl, Fritz. “Veritas Filia Temporis” inPhilosophy and History: The Ernst Cassirer Festschrift. Ed. Raymond Klibanskt and H. J. Paton. New York: Harper & Row, 1963: 197–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spieker, Joseph B. “El feminismo como clave estructural en lasnovelle de Doña María de Zayas.”Explicación de textos literarios 6 (1978): 153–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullman, Pierre L. “The Surrogates of Baroque Marcela and Mannerist Leandra.”Revista de estudios hispánicos 5 (1971): 307–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welles, Marcia L. “María de Zayas y Sotomayor and Her novela cortesana: a Re-evaluation.”Bulletin of Hispanic Studies 55 (1978): 301–310.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nadeau, C.A. Evoking Astraea: The speeches of Marcela and Dorotea inDon Quijote I . Neophilologus 79, 53–61 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999562

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999562

Keywords

  • Comparative Literature
  • Historical Linguistic