Skip to main content
Log in

X-ray image compression using run length coding

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The recent availability of a special-purpose IC implementing the standard CCITT run length coder/decoder has made it possible for distortion free image compression to be done economically and quickly with a personal computer plug-in circuit card. Although the code table implemented is designed for bit-mapped document images at one bit per pixel, an experiment has been undertaken to investigate its role in compressing multiple bit per pixel images such as radiographs. Representative x-ray images of various body parts are processed; the average compression ratio and standard deviation is 2.37 and 0.28, respectively, for CCITT group 4 compression, and 2.21 and 0.29, for CCITT group 3 compression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hall, E.L.,Computer Image Processing and Recognition, Academic Press, New York, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Glenn, M.E., Image compression for medical imaging systems,J. Med. Syst. 11(2–3):149–156, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Huang, H.K., Progress in image processing technology related to radiological sciences: A five-year review.Comp. Methods Progr. Biomed. 25(2):143–156, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Huang, H.K.,et al., Radiological image compression using error-free (and) irreversible two-dimensional direct-cosine-transform coding techniques.J. Optical Soc. Am. 4(5):984–992, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lo, S.C.,et al., Compression of radiological images with 512, 1024, and 2048 matricies.Radiology 161(2):519–525, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  6. The Consultative Committee for International Telephone and Telegraph,Standardization of Group 3 Facsimile Apparatus for Document Transmission, Geneva, 1980.

  7. Compression Expansion Processor Am7971 Technical Manual, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Sunnyvale, Calif., 1987.

  8. Kemmler, W.,AM7971 Compression Expansion Processor Evaluation Board User's Manual Hardware and Software, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Sunnyvale, Calif., 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bodson, D.,et al., Measurement of data compression in Advanced Group 4 Facsimile Systems.Proc. IEEE 73(4), 1985.

  10. Henderson, B.E., PC based x-ray imaging system.Proceedings of SPIE's Medical Imaging II, Bellingham, Wash. 98227-0010, in press, 1988.

  11. Seeley, G.W.,et al., Total digital radiology department: Spatial resolution requirements.AJR 148:421–426, 1987, Radiology Dept., University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, Ariz. 85724.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Walker, F.L., Compression study.National Library of Medicine Technical Report, Bethesda, Maryland 20894, August 1987.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cookson, J.P., Thoma, G.R. X-ray image compression using run length coding. J Med Syst 12, 201–209 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999500

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999500

Keywords

Navigation