Skip to main content
Log in

EMG feedback for the treatment of upper-extremity dysfunction: Can it be effective?

  • Published:
Biofeedback and Self-regulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the application of EMG feedback for upper-extremity dysfunction secondary to neurologic injury. A rationale for the use of EMG feedback to enhance rotational components of upper-limb movement, train recruitment of the prime movers, and promote inhibition of motor responses that interfere with efficient and effortless movement is presented. Specific strategies that can be used to reinforce functional movement patterns are elaborated. A case study illustrating the application of the feedback strategies is provided. Despite sensory, perceptual, and cognitive impairments, a 53-year-old left hemiplegic obtained significant clinical upperlimb functional gains when given EMG feedback in conjunction with occupational therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews, J. M. (1964). Neuromuscular re-education of the hemiplegic with the aid of the electromyograph.Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 45 530–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach-y-Rita, P. (1983). Rehabilitation versus passive recovery of motor control following central nervous system lesions. In J. E. Desmedt (Ed.),Motor control mechanisms in health and disease. New York: Raven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M., Regenos, E., Wolf, S. L., & Basmajian, J. V. (1977). Developing strategies for biofeedback: applications in neurologically handicapped patients.Physical Therapy, 57 402–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basmajian, J. V. (1980). Electromyography-dynamic gross anatomy: A review.American Journal of Anatomy, 159 345–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basmajian J. V., Gowland, C. A., Brandstater, M. E., Swanson, L. R., & Trotter, J. E. (1982). EMG feedback treatment of the upper limb in hemiplegic stroke patients.Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 63 613–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basmajian, J. V., & Blumenstein, R. (1983). Electrode placement in electromyographic biofeedback. In J. V. Basmajian (Ed.),Biofeedback: Principles and practice for clinicians. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basmajian, M. V., & DeLuca, C. J. (1985).Muscles alive: Their functions revealed by electromyography. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basmajian, J. V., Gowland, C. A., Finlayson, A. J., Hall, A. L. Swanson, L. R., Statford, P. W., Trotter, J. E., & Brandstater, M. E. (1987). Stroke treatment: comparison of integrated behavioral-physical therapy vs traditional physical therapy programs.Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 68 267–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder-Macleod, S. A. (1983). Biofeedback in stroke rehabilitation. In J. V. Basmajian (Ed.),Biofeedback: Principles and practice for clinicians. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobath, B. (1978).Adult hemiplegia: Evaluation and treatment. London: William Heinemann Medical Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D. M., & Nahai, F. (1983). Biofeedback strategies of the occupational therapist in total hand rehabilitation. In J. V. Basmajian (Ed.),Biofeedback: Principles and practice for clinicians. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brudny, J., Korein, J., Grynbraum, B., Freidman, L., Weinstein, S., Sachs-Frankel G., & Belandres, P. V. (1976). EMG feedback therapy: Review of treatment of 114 patients.Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 57 55–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calliet, R. (1980). The shoulder in hemiplegia. Philadelphia: Davis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, J.H., & Shephard, R. B. (1983).A motor relearning programme for stroke. Rockville, MD: Aspen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croce, R. V. (1986). The effects of EMG biofeedback on strength acquisition.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 11 299–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P. (1985).Steps to follow: A guide to the treatment of adult hemiplegia. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bacher, G. (1983). Biofeedback in spacticity control. In J. V. Basmajian (Ed.),Biofeedback: Principles and practice for clinicians. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernando, C.K., & Basmajian, J. V. (1978). Biofeedback in physical medicine and rehabilitation.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 3 435–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavin, J., & Stephan, K. (1976). Biofeedback muscle re-education: A clinical review of ten cases.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 1 330–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowland, C. (1982). Recovery of motor function following stroke: Profile and predictors.Physiotherapy, 34 77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglis, J., Campbell, D., & Donald, M. W. (1976). Electromyographic biofeedback and neuromuscular rehabilitation.Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 8 299–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglis, J., Donald, M. W., Monga, T. N., Sproule, M., & Young, M. F. (1984). Electromyographic biofeedback and physical therapy of the hemiplegic upper limb.Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 65 755–759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglis, J., Sproule, M., & Leicht, M. (1976). Electromyographic biofeedback treatment of residual neuromuscular disabilities after cerebrovascular accident.Physiotherapy (Canada), 28 260–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. L., Baker, M. P., & Wolf, S. L. (1979). Procedures for EMG biofeedback training in involved upper extremities of hemiplegia patients.Physical Therapy, 59 1500–1507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knott, M., & Voss, D. E. (1968).Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation patterns and techniques. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marinacci, A. A., & Horande, M. (1960). Electromyograph in neuromuscular re-education.Bulletin of the Los Angeles Neurological Society, 25 57–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middaugh, S., & Miller, C. (1980). Electromyographic feedback: Effect on voluntary muscle contractions in paretic subjects.Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 61 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middaugh, S., Miller, C., & Foster, G. (1982). Voluntary relaxation of spastic muscles in stroke patients: Comparison of EMG feedback, non-feedback and baseline groups.Proceedings of the Biofeedback Society of America 13th Annual Meeting, pp. 127–129.

  • Phillips, C. S. (1986).Movements of the hand. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryerson, S., & Levit, K. (1987). The shoulder in hemiplegia. In R. Donatelli (Ed.),Clinics in physical therapy: Physical therapy of the shoulder. New York: Churchill Livingstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skelly, M., & Kenedi, R. M. (1982). EMG biofeedback therapy in the re-education of the hemiplegic shoulder in patients with sensory loss.Physiotherapy, 68 34–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, S. S., & Dince, W. M. (1981). Biofeedback efficacy studies: critique of critiques.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 6 275–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taub, E. (1980). Somatosensory deafferentation research with monkeys: Implication for rehabilitation medicine. In L. P. Ince (Ed.),Behavioral psychology in rehabilitation medicine: Clinical applications. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taub, E. (1986). Overcoming “learned nouse” in deafferented monkeys.Proceedings: Self-Regulation and Health, 17th Biofeedback Society of America Annual Meeting.

  • Warfel, J. H. (1974).The extremities. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, S. L. (1983). Electromyographic biofeedback applications to stroke patients: A critical review.Physical Therapy, 63 1448–1459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, S. (1986). The application of a forced use paradigm to chronic head-injured and stroke patients.Proceedings. Self-Regulation and Health, 17th Biofeedback Society of America Annual Meeting.

  • Wolf, S. L., Baker, M. P., & Kelly, J. L. (1979). EMG biofeedback in stroke: effect of patient characteristics.Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 60 96–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, S. L., & Binder-Macleod, S. A. (1983). Electromyographic biofeedback applications for the hemiplegic patient.Journal of the American Physical Therapy Association, 63 1393–1403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, S. L., & Fischer-Williams, M. (1987). The use of biofeedback in disorders of motor function. In J. P. Hatch, J. G. Fisher, and J. D. Rugh (Eds.),Biofeedback: Studies in clinical efficacy. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The author wishes to thank Jennifer Cheyne for her assistance in preparing the graphs and illustrations, and Sandi Spaulding and Mary Petrie for their critical review of an early version of this manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tries, J. EMG feedback for the treatment of upper-extremity dysfunction: Can it be effective?. Biofeedback and Self-Regulation 14, 21–53 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999339

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999339

Descriptor Key Words

Navigation