Can clinical biofeedback be scientifically validated? A follow-up on the Green-Shellenberger-Furedy-Roberts debates
- 25 Downloads
KeywordsHealth Psychology Biological Psychology Clinical Biofeedback
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Dowman, R., & Rosenfeld, J. P. (1985). Operant conditioning of somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) in rats. I. Specific changes in SEP amplitude and a naloxone-reversible, somatotopically specific change in facial nociception.Brain Research, 333 201–212.Google Scholar
- Furedy, J. J. (1985). Specific vs. placebo effects in biofeedback: Science-based vs. snake-oil behavioral medicine.Clinical Biofeedback and Health, 8 155–162.Google Scholar
- Furedy, J. J. (1987). Specific versus placebo effects in biofeedback training: A critical lay perspective.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 12 169–184.Google Scholar
- Furedy, J. J. & Riley, D. (1982). Classical and operant conditioning in the enchancement of biofeedback: Specific and speculations. In L. White & B. Tursky (Eds.),Clinical Biofeedback: Efficacy and Mechanisms (pp. 74–102). New York: Guiford Press.Google Scholar
- Green, J., & Shellenberger, R. (1986a). Biofeedback research and the ghost in the box: A reply to Roberts.American Psychologist, 41 1003–1005.Google Scholar
- Green, J., & Shellenberger, R. (1986b). Clinical biofeedback training and the ghost in the box: A reply to Furedy.Clinical Biofeedback and Health, 9 96–105.Google Scholar
- Norris, P. A. (1985). On the status of biofeedback and clinical practice.American Psychologist, 41 1009–1010.Google Scholar
- Roberts, A. H. (1985). Biofeedback.American Psychologist, 40 938–941.Google Scholar
- Roberts, A. H. (1986). Biofeedback, science, and training.American Psychologist, 41 1010.Google Scholar
© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1987