Skip to main content
Log in

Physiological mechanism of digital vasoconstriction training

  • Research Recognition Award Paper
  • Published:
Biofeedback and Self-regulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent work in our laboratory has shown that vasodilation produced during temperature biofeedback training is mediated through a nonneural, beta-adrenergic mechanism. Here we sought to determine if the effects of feedback training for vasoconstriction are produced through a neural or nonneural pathway and whether other measures of physiological activity are correlated with these changes. Nine normal subjects received temperature feedback vasoconstriction training in which feedback was delivered only during periods of successful performance. In a subsequent session, the nerves to one finger were blocked with a local anesthetic while finger blood flow was recorded from this and other fingers. Vasoconstriction occurred during feedback in the intact fingers but not in the nerve-blocked finger and was accompanied by increased skin conductance and heart rate. These data demonstrate that temperature feedback vasoconstriction training is mediated through an efferent, sympathetic nervous pathway. In contrast, temperature feedback vasodilation training is mediated through a nonneural, beta-adrenergic mechanism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cohen, R., & Coffman, J. (1981). Beta-adrenergic vasodilating mechanism in the finger.Circulation Research, 49 1196–1201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetcher, E., Hall, J., & Shaub, H. (1949). The skin temperature of an extremity as a measure of its blood flow.Science, 110 422–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, R., Ianni, P., & Wenig, P. (1983). Behavioral treatment of Raynaud's disease.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51 539–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, R., Sabharwal, S., Ianni, P., Desai, N., Wenig, P., & Mayes, M. (1988). Non-neural β-adrenergic vasodilating mechanism in temperature biofeedback.Psychosomatic Medicine, 50 394–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, C., Ludbrook, J., & Wilson, A. (1971). The response of hand blood flow to distant ice application.Australian Journal of Experimental Biology and Medical Science, 49 145–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keefe, F., & Gardner, E. (1979). Learned control of skin temperature: Effects of short and long-term biofeedback training.Behavior Therapy, 10 202–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, J. T. (1963).Physiology of the circulation in human limbs in health and disease. Philadelphia: Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surwit, R., Shapiro, D., & Feld, J. (1976). Digital temperature autoregulation and associated cardiovascular changes.Psychophysiology, 13 242–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taub, E. (1977). Self-regulation of human tissue temperature. In G. E. Schwartz & J. Beatty (Eds.),Biofeedback: Theory and research (pp. 265–300). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallin, B., Delius, W., & Hagbarth, K. (1973). Comparison of sympathetic nerve activity in normotensive and hypertensive subjects.Circulation Research, 23 9–21.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported by research grant HL-30604 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Freedman, R.R., Morris, M., Norton, D.A.M. et al. Physiological mechanism of digital vasoconstriction training. Biofeedback and Self-Regulation 13, 299–305 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999086

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999086

Descriptor Key Words

Navigation