Biofeedback and Self-regulation

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 89–99 | Cite as

Constructive integration of learning theory and phenomenological approaches to biofeedback training

  • Avram J. Zolten


Two major sources of theoretical development for biofeedback as an intervention paradigm are considered. An integration of cognitive learning theory approaches to the potential regulation of autonomic processes in an information-processing framework and the phenomenological information-processing approach of Kelly's personal construct theory suggest a new methodological paradigm for biofeedback as a tool of psychotherapeutic intervention, especially for the discipline of behavioral medicine. Biofeedback is reconstrued as a sequence of allocating attention to automatic cognitive processes until cognitive control has been mastered. This sequence is also seen as a circumspection-preemption-control cycle that Kelly (1955) suggested was essential to all problem solving. In light of Kelly's fundamental assumptions regarding the nature of constructs, it is suggested that controlled processing approaches to biofeedback require the biofeedback trainee to investigate both ends of psychophysiological dichotomies instead of demonstrative constructs of traditional biofeedback methodology. Other psychotherapeutic techniques are reviewed to validate this new theoretical approach. Finally, treatment within this paradigm is discussed as a recircumspection of relevant constructs that were routinized during the alarm reaction phase of Selye's general adaptation syndrome.

Descriptor Key Words

biofeedback controlled processes CPC-cycle autonomic processes automatic processes 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Achterberg, J., & Lawlis, G. F. (1978).Imagery of cancer. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.Google Scholar
  2. Andrasik, F., & Holroyd, K. A. (1980). A test of specific and nonspecific effects in the biofeedback treatment of tension headache.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48 575–586.Google Scholar
  3. Benson, H. (1975).The relaxation response. New York: Avon.Google Scholar
  4. Besner, H. (1978). Biofeedback: Possible placebo in treating chronic onset insomnia.Biofeed-back and Self-Regulation, 3 208.Google Scholar
  5. Brod, J. (1964). Circulation in muscle during acute pressor responses to emotional stress during chronic sustained elevation of blood pressure.American Heart Journal, 48 575–586.Google Scholar
  6. Frankl, V. (1978).The unheard cry for meaning. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  7. Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. (1979). Automatic and effortful processes in memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 108(3), 356–388.Google Scholar
  8. Holroyd, K., Andrasik, F., & Westbrook, T. (1977). Cognitive control of tension headache.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1 121–133.Google Scholar
  9. Hughes, H., Brown, B., Lawlis, G. F., & Fulton, J. (1983). Treatment of acne vulgaris by biofeedback and cognitive imagery,Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 27(3), 185–191.Google Scholar
  10. Hutchings, D., & Reinking, R. (1976). Tension headaches: What form of therapy is most effective.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 1 183–190.Google Scholar
  11. Kahneman, D. (1973).Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  12. Kelly, G. (1955).Psychology of personal constructs (Vols. 1, 2). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  13. McGlynn, F., & Cornell, C. (1985). Simple phobia. In M. Hersen & A. Bellack (Eds.),Handbook of clinical behavior therapy with adults. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  14. Miller, N. (1969). Learning of visceral and glandular responses.Science, 163 434–445.Google Scholar
  15. Miller, N. (1978). Biofeedback and visceral learning.Annual Review of Psychology, 29 373–404.Google Scholar
  16. Nouwen, A., & Solinger, J. (1979). The effectiveness of EMG biofeedback in low back pain.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 4 103–112.Google Scholar
  17. Patterson, C. (1986).Theories of counseling and psychotherapy (4th ed.). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  18. Posner, M., & Snyder, C. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.),Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Roberts, A. (1985). Biofeedback: Research, training, and clinical roles.American Psychologist, 40(8), 938–941.Google Scholar
  20. Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I detection, search, and attention.Psychological Review, 84 1–66.Google Scholar
  21. Selye, H. (1973). The evolution of the stress concept.American Scientist, 61 692–699.Google Scholar
  22. Snyder, C., & Noble, M. (1968). Operant conditioning of vasoconstriction.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77 263–268.Google Scholar
  23. Turk, D., Meichenbaum, D., & Berman, W. (1979). Application of biofeedback for the regulation of pain: A critical review.Psychological Bulletin, 86 1322–1338.Google Scholar
  24. Tursky, C. (1982). An engineering approach to biofeedback. In T. White & C. Tursky (Eds.),Clinical biofeedback: Efficacy and mechanisms (pp. 108–126). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  25. Wolpe, J. (1958).Psychotherapy by reciprocal inhibition. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Woolfolk, R., & Lehrer, P. (1985). Stress and generalized anxiety. In M. Hersen & A. Bellack (Eds.),Handbook of clinical behavior therapy with adults. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Avram J. Zolten
    • 1
  1. 1.University of North TexasUSA

Personalised recommendations