Skip to main content
Log in

Cognitive self-control factors in EMG biofeedback

  • Published:
Biofeedback and Self-regulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated the efficacy of manipulation of cognitive self-control expectancy in EMG biofeedback training. It was predicted that a treatment procedure, which includes a positive-cognitive stage that establishes and reinforces a positive self-control belief system and also includes a training stage in EMG biofeedback, will be more effective in achieving a reduction in EMG activity than a treatment procedure which includes a negative-cognitive stage and which also includes ambiguous features prior to training and a treatment approach solely concerned with training. The study consisted of four groups with 10 subjects in each. In one group, expectation for inner control ability was created prior to actual training in reducing EMG activity. In the second group, expectation for negative self-control ability was created prior to EMG training. The third group only underwent the actual training in EMG. The fourth group served as a control group. The results show that the positive-cognitive self-control group was significantly more effective in reducing muscle activity than the other groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychological Review 1977,84 191–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blittner, M., Goldberg, J., & Merbaum, M. Cognitive self-control factors in the reduction of smoking behavior.Behavior Therapy 1978,9 553–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. A cognitively oriented psychologist looks at biofeedback.American Psychologist 1975,30 553–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. A cognitive analysis of biofeedback control. In G. E. Schwartz & J. Beatty (Eds.),Biofeedback: Theory and research. New York: Academic Press, 1977. Pp. 67–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meichenbaum, D.Toward a cognitive theory of self-control. Waterloo, Ontario, Canada: Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Research Report No. 48, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meichenbaum, D. Cognitive factors in biofeedback therapy.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation 1976,1 201–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, J. L. EMG biofeedback reduction of tension headache: A cognitive skills training approach.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation 1976,1 217–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, G., & Shapiro, D. Biofeedback and essential hypertension: Current findings and theoretical concerns.Seminars in Psychiatry 1973,5 493–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, A. J.Biofeedback and the modification of behavior. New York: Plenum Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goldberg, J., Weller, L. & Blittner, M. Cognitive self-control factors in EMG biofeedback. Biofeedback and Self-Regulation 7, 545–551 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00998893

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00998893

Keywords

Navigation