Advertisement

Biofeedback and Self-regulation

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 25–36 | Cite as

Effects of noncontingent feedback on EMG training, EMG responses, and subjective experience

  • Joyce Segreto-Bures
  • Harry Kotses
Article

Abstract

Various types of noncontingent feedback have been used as control procedures in EMG training; however, their effects on such training have received little attention. Experiment 1 in the present study examined the effects of noncontingent feedback on EMG training, and Experiment 2 assessed the effects of feedback characteristics on EMG responses. In Experiment 1, three noncontingent feedback groups (yoked control, randomly fluctuating tones, and decreasing tones) and one contingent group underwent 20 minutes of training for frontal EMG decreases. Procedures in Experiment 2 were identical to those in Experiment 1 except that subjects were instructed merely to listen to the feedback tones. Results of Experiment 1 indicated that contingent and noncontingent fluctuating feedback groups achieved significantly lower EMG levels than noncontingent decreasing and yoked control groups. In Experiment 2, however, no differences in EMG activity were found among groups. In both experiments, groups did not differ in terms of subjective variables such as frustration, suspiciousness about the tone, or length of time attending to the tone. Results of these two experiments suggest that differences in EMG responses to various types of noncontingent feedback result from interactions between characteristics of the feedback stimulus and instructions to decrease the stimulus.

Descriptor Key Words

noncontingent FB control procedures EMG biofeedback 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, A. B., & Smith, D. D. (1979). Clinical applications of EMG biofeedback. In B. J. Gatchel & K. P. Price (Eds.),Clinical applications of biofeedback: Appraisal and status. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alper, J. S. (1977). The influence of EMG feedback and training site on the acquisition, generalization, transfer, and retention of inhibitory neuromuscular control (Doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, 1977).Dissertation Abstracts International, 38, 1867–1867B. (University Microfilms No. 77-21, 104).Google Scholar
  3. Budzynski, T. H., & Stoyva, J. M. (1969). An instrument for producing deep muscle relaxation by means of analog information feedback.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 231–237.Google Scholar
  4. Budzynski, T. H., Stoyva, J. M., Adler, C. S., & Mullaney, D. J. (1973). EMG biofeedback and tension headache: A controlled outcome study.Psychosomatic Medicine, 35, 484–496.Google Scholar
  5. Bures, J., & Fisher, L. E. (1981). Transfer of stress-coping practice to a stress-producing situation.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 6 416–417. (Abstract)Google Scholar
  6. Bures, J., & Kotses, H. (1981). Schedules of reinforcement in frontal EMG conditioning.Psychophysiology, 18 143. (Abstract)Google Scholar
  7. Carlson, J. G. (1977). Locus of control and frontal electromyographic response training.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 2 259–271.Google Scholar
  8. Carlson, J. G. (1980). Proportional and discrete feedback in frontal EMG training.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 5 360–361. (Abstract)Google Scholar
  9. Carlson, J. G., & Feld, J. L. (1978). Role of incentives in the training of the frontal EMG relaxation response.Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 1 427–436.Google Scholar
  10. Cohen, H. D., Graham, C., Fotopoulos, S. S., & Cook, M. R. (1977). A double-blind methodology for biofeedback research.Psychophysiology, 14 603–608.Google Scholar
  11. Coursey, R. D. (1975). Electromyograph feedback as a relaxation technique.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43 825–834.Google Scholar
  12. Davis, J. F. (1952).Manual of surface electromyography. Montreal: Laboratory for Psychological Studies, Allen Memorial Institute of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
  13. Fisher, L. E., & Kotses, H. (1974). Experimenter and subject sex effects in the skin conductance response.Psychophysiology, 11 191–196.Google Scholar
  14. Gatchel, R. J., Korman, M., Weiss, C. B., Jr., Smith, D., & Clarke, L. (1978). A multiple response evaluation of EMG biofeedback performance during training and stress-induction conditions.Psychophysiology, 15 253–258.Google Scholar
  15. Glaus, K. D., & Kotses, H. (1979). Generalization of conditioned muscle tension: A closer look.Psychophysiology, 16 513–519.Google Scholar
  16. Graham, C., Cohen, H. D., Cook, M. R., Gerkovich, M. M., Phelps, J. W., & Fotopoulos, S. S. (1981). Physiological learning and biofeedback: A criterion study using double-blind, yoked-control procedures.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 6 424. (Abstract)Google Scholar
  17. Harver, A., & Kotses, H. (1982). Distribution of practice and resistance to extinction in frontal EMG conditioning.Psychophysiology, 19 322. (Abstract)Google Scholar
  18. Hatch, J. P. (1982). Controlled group designs in biofeedback research: “What does the control group control for?”Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 7 377–390.Google Scholar
  19. Haynes, S. N., Moseley, D., & McGowan, W. T. (1975). Relaxation training and biofeedback in the reduction of frontalis muscle tension.Psychophysiology, 12 547–552.Google Scholar
  20. Jessup, B. A., & Neufeld, R. W. J. (1977). Effects of biofeedback and “autogenic relaxation” techniques on physiological and subjective responses in psychiatric patients: A preliminary analysis.Behavior Therapy, 8 160–167.Google Scholar
  21. Kappes, B., & Michaud, J. (1978). Contingent versus noncontingent EMG feedback and hand temperature in relation to anxiety and locus of control.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 3 51–60.Google Scholar
  22. Katkin, E. S., & Goldband, S. (1979). The placebo effect and biofeedback. In R. J. Gatchel & K. P. Price (Eds.),Clinical applications of biofeedback: Appraisal and status. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kiffer, J. J., Fridlund, A. J., & Fowler, S. C. (1981). Effects of alternative control procedures for electromyographic biofeedback relaxation research.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 6 225–233.Google Scholar
  24. Kinsman, R. A., O'Banion, K., Robinson, S., & Staudenmayer, H. (1975). Continuous biofeedback and discrete posttrial verbal feedback in frontalis muscle relaxation training.Psychophysiology, 12 30–35.Google Scholar
  25. Kinsman, R. A., & Staudenmayer, H. (1978). Baseline levels in muscle relaxation training.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 3 97–104.Google Scholar
  26. Kirk, R. E. (1968).Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences Belmont, California: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  27. Kondo, C. Y., & Canter, A. (1977). True and false electromyographic feedback: Effect on tension headache.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86 93–95.Google Scholar
  28. Kotses, H., & Bures, J. (1982). Effects of subject expectancy in EMG training.Psychophysiology, 19 330. (Abstract)Google Scholar
  29. Kotses, H., Glaus, K. D., Bricel, S. K., Edwards, J. E., & Crawford, P. L. (1978). Operant muscular relaxation and peak expiratory flow rate in asthmatic children.Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 22 17–23.Google Scholar
  30. Kotses, H., Glaus, K. D., Crawford, P. L., Edwards, J. E., & Scherr, M. S. (1976). Operant reduction of frontalis EMG activity in the treatment of asthma in children.Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 20 453–459.Google Scholar
  31. Kotses, H., & Layh, J. P. (1981). Correlation between sample and integrated measures of EMG activity.American Journal of Clinical Biofeedback, 4 117–120.Google Scholar
  32. Kotses, H., & Weiner, H. (1982). Effects of home practice exercises on EMG activity subsequent to biofeedback training.American Journal of Clinical Biofeedback, 5 103–109.Google Scholar
  33. Segreto-Bures, J., & Kotses, H. (1982). Experimenter expectancy effects in frontal EMG conditioning.Psychophysiology, 19 467–471.Google Scholar
  34. Siddle, D. A. T., & Wood, L. (1978). Effects of frontalis EMG feedback on frontalis tension level, cardiac activity, and electrodermal activity.Biological Psychology, 7 169–173.Google Scholar
  35. Staudenmayer, H., & Kinsman, R. A. (1976). Awareness during electromyographic biofeedback: Of signal or process?Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 1 191–199.Google Scholar
  36. Stern, G. S., & Berrenberg, J. L. (1977). Biofeedback training in frontalis muscle relaxation and enhancement of belief in personal control.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 2 173–182.Google Scholar
  37. Winer, B. J. (1962).Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  38. Yock, T. J. (1977). Electromyographic feedback as a relaxation procedure: A psychophysiological evaluation (Doctoral dissertation, University of Rochester, 1977).Dissertation Abstracts International, 38, 2895B. (University Microfilms No. 77-25, 494)Google Scholar
  39. Yorde, B. S., & Witmer, J. M. (1980). An educational format for teaching stress management to groups with a wide range of stress symptoms.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 5 75–90.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joyce Segreto-Bures
    • 1
  • Harry Kotses
    • 1
  1. 1.Ohio UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations