Operant control of EEG and event-related and slow brain potentials

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Research on operant control of brain potentials is reviewed. From single-unit firing and spontaneous EEG activity to event-related potentials such as sensory and pain evoked potentials, and slow potential shifts, most of the aspects of electrical brain activity have been investigated. Results produced by conditioning of spontaneous EEG oscillations (alpha and theta) dampened the early enthusiasm: e.g., no increase above baseline levels could be achieved and no reliable behavioral effects became manifest. Evidence accumulates, however, that operant conditioning of the sensorimotor rhythm (12–15 Hz) may lead to successful self-regulation and that epileptic patients may profit from the training. First steps in the conditioning of brainstem, as well as pain evoked potentials suggest that self-regulation of EPs can be achieved by adequate biofeedback procedures. If some of the observed behavioral effects prove to be stable, the therapeutic usefulness seems to be within reach. A comparable progress has been achieved for the operant control of slow potentials (DC-shifts across seconds). Biofeedback procedures have been used successfully as a scientific tool to achieve systematic variations on a psychological level and to record psychological covariations. This method may provide insights into the behavioral meaning of electrical brain activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Bauer, H. (1984). Regulation of slow brain potentials affects task performance. In T. Elbert, B. Rockstroh, W. Lutzenberger, & N. Birbaumer (Eds.),Self-regulation of the brain and behavior. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bauer, H., & Lauber, W. (1979). Operant conditioning of steady potential shifts in man.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 4 145–154.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bauer, R. H. (1976). Short term memory: EEG alpha correlates and the effect of increased alpha.Behavioral Biology, 17 435.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beatty, J. (1973).Self-regulation as an aid to human effectiveness (Annual Progress Report under Contract N00014-70-C-0350, submitted to San Diego State University Foundation). Los Angeles: UCLA.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Beatty, J. & O'Hanlon, J. (1979). Operant control of posterior theta rhythms and vigilance performance: Repeated treatments and transfer of training. In N. Birbaumer & H. Kimmel (Eds.),Biofeedback and self-regulation Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bird, B. L., Newton, F. A., Sheer, D. E., & Ford, M. R. (1978a). Biofeedback training of 40-Hz EEG in humans.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 3 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bird, B. L., Newton, F. A., Sheer, D. E., & Ford, M. R. (1978b). Behavioral and electroencephalographic correlates of 40-Hz EEG biofeedback training in humans.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 3 13–28.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chernigovskaya, N. (1984). Biofeedback control in epilepsy and neuroses. In T. Elbert, B. Rockstroh, W. Lutzenberger, & N. Birbaumer (Eds.),Self-regulation of the brain and behavior. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Connor, W. H., & Lang, P. J. (1969). Cortical slow-wave and cardiac rate responses in stimulus orientation and reaction time conditions.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 82 310–320.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Elbert, T. (1978). Biofeedback langsamer kortikaler Potentiale. Munich: Minerva.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Elbert, T., Birbaumer, N., Lutzenberger, W., & Rockstroh, B. (1979). Biofeedback of slow cortical potentials: Self regulation of central autonomic patterns. In N. Birbaumer & H. D. Kimmel (Eds.),Biofeedback and self-regulation. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Elbert, T., Lutzenberger, W., Rockstroh, B., & Birbaumer, N. (1983). When regulation of slow brain potentials fails — a contribution to the psychophysiology of perceptual aberration and anhedonia.Archives of Biological Psychiatry, 13 98–106.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Elbert, T., Rockstroh, B., Lutzenberger, W., & Birbaumer, N. (1980a). Biofeedback of slow cortical potentials.Journal of Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 48 293–301.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Elbert, T., Rockstroh, B., Lutzenberger, W., & Birbaumer, N. (1980b). Biofeedback langsamer kortikaler Potentiale. In H. D. Roesler, J. Ott, & E. Richter-Heinrich (Eds.),Neuropsychologische Probleme der klinischen Psychologie. Berlin: VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fetz, E. E. (1969). Operant conditioning of cortical unit activity.Science, 163 955–958.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fetz, E. E., & Baker, M. A. (1973). Operantly conditioned patterns of precentral unit activity and correlated responses in adjacent cells and contralateral muscles.Journal of Neurophysiology, 36 179–204.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fetz, E. E., & Finocchio, D. V. (1975). Correlations between activity of motor cortex cells and arm muscle during operantly conditioned response patterns.Experimental Brain Research, 23 217–240.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Finley, W. (1984). Biofeedback of very early potentials from the brain stem. In T. Elbert, B. Rockstroh, W. Lutzenberger, & N. Birbaumer (Eds.),Self-regulation of the brain and behavior. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kamiya, J. (1969). Operant control of the EEG alpha rhythm and some of its reported effects on consciousness. In Tart (Ed.), New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lawrence, G. H., & Johnson, L. C. (1977). Biofeedback and performance. In G. Schwartz & J. Beatty (Eds.),Biofeedback: Theory and research. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Loveless, N. E., & Sanford, J. A. (1974). Slow potential correlates of preparatory set.Biological Psychology, 1 303–314.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lubar, J. F. (1982). EEG operant conditioning in severe epileptics: Controlled multidimensional studies. In L. White & B. Tursky (Eds.),Clinical biofeedback. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lubar, J. (1984). Applications of operant conditioning of the EEG for the management of epileptic seizures. In T. Elbert, B. Rockstroh, W. Lutzenberger, & N. Birbaumer (Eds.),Self-regulation of the brain and behavior. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lutzenberger, W., Birbaumer, N., Elbert, T., Rockstroh, B., Bippus, W., & Breidt, R. (1980). Selfregulation of slow cortical potentials in normal subjects and patients with frontal lobe lesions. In H. H. Kornhuber & L. Deecke (Eds.),Motivation, motor and sensory processes of the brain. Electrical potentials, behavior and clinical use. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lutzenberger, W., Birbaumer, N., & Steinmetz, P. (1976). Simultaneous biofeedback of heart rate and frontal EMG as a pretraining for the control of EEG theta activity.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation 1 395–410.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lutzenberger, W., Birbaumer, N., & Wildgruber, C. (1975). An experiment on the feedback of the theta activity of the human EEG.European Journal Behav. Anal. Mod., 2 119–126.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lutzenberger, W., Elbert, T., Rockstroh, B., & Birbaumer, N. (1979). Effects of slow cortical potentials on performance in a signal detection task.International Journal of Neuroscience, 9 175–183.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lutzenberger, W., Elbert, T., Rockstroh, B., & Birbaumer, N. (1982). Biofeedback of slow cortical potentials and its effects on the performance in mental arithmetic tasks.Biological Psychology, 14 99–111.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lutzenberger, W., Elbert, T., Rockstroh, B., & Birbaumer, N. (in press). Lateral asymmetries of event related brain potentials during tactile tasks.International Journal of Psychophysiology.

  30. Lynch, J. J., & Paskewitz, D. A. (1971). On the mechanisms of feedback control of human brain wave activity.Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 153 205–217.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Melzack, R., & Perry, C. (1975). Self-regulation of alpha feedback and hypnotic training for the control of chronic pain.Experimental Neurology, 46 452–464.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mulholland, T. (1962). The electro-encephalogram as an experimental tool in the study of internal attention gradients.Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 24 664–669.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mulholland, T. (1984). Concepts of control in biofeedback. In T. Elbert, B. Rockstroh, W. Lutzenberger, & N. Birbaumer,Self-regulation of the brain and behavior. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  34. O'Hanlon, K., & Beatty, J. (1975).EEG theta regulation and radar monitoring performance in a controlled field experiment (Tech. Rep. under Contract N 000 14-70-C-0350, submitted to San Diego State University Foundation), Los Angeles: Human Factors Research and University of California at Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Olds, J. (1965). Operant conditioning of single unit responses. XXII Int. Congress of Physiological Sciences, Lectures, Symposia, Tokyo (pp. 372–380), Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Orne, M. T., Evans, F., Wilson, S., & Paskewitz, D. A. (1975).The potential effectiveness of autoregulation as a technique to increase performance under stress (Final Summary Report under Contract N 000 14-70-C-0350, submitted to San Diego State University Foundation). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Posner, M. (1978).Chronometric explorations of mind. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rockstroh, B., Elbert, T., Birbaumer, N., & Lutzenberger, W. (1982).Slow brain potentials and behavior. Baltimore: Urban & Schwarzenberg.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rockstroh, B., Elbert, T., Lutzenberger, W., & Birbaumer, N. (1980). Slow cortical potentials and response speed. In H. H. Kornhuber & L. Deecke (Eds.),Motivation, motor and sensory process of the brain. Electrical potentials, behavior, and clinical use. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Rockstroh, B., Elbert, T., Lutzenberger, W., & Birbaumer, N. (1982b). The effect of slow cortical potentials on response speed.Psychophysiology, 19 211–217.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Rockstroh, B., Elbert, T., Lutzenberger, W., & Birbaumer, N. Operant control of slow brain potentials: A tool in the investigation of the potential's meaning and its relation to attentional dysfunction. In T. Elbert, B. Rockstroh, W. Lutzenberger, & N. Birbaumer (Eds.),Self-regulation of the brain and behavior. Heidelberg: Springer.

  42. Roger, M. (1984). Operant control of evoked potentials: Some comments on the learning characteristics in man and on the conditioning of subcortical responses in the curarized rat. In T. Elbert, B. Rockstroh, W. Lutzenberger, & N. Birbaumer (Eds.),Self-regulation of the brain and behavior. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Roger, M., & Galand, G. (1981). Operant conditioning of visual evoked potentials in man.Psychophysiology, 18 477–482.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Rohrbaugh, J., & Gaillard, A. (1983). Sensory and motor aspects of the contingent negative variation. In A. Gaillard & W. Ritter (Eds.),Turtorials in event related potential research: Endogenous contents. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Rosenfeld, J. P. (1977). The meaning of operantly conditioned changes in evoked responses. In G. Schwartz, J. Beatty (Eds.),Biofeedback: Theory and Research. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Rosenfeld, J. P., Dowman, R., Silvia, R., & Heinricher, M. (1984). Operantly controlled somatosensory brain potentials: Specific effects on pain processes. In T. Elbert, B. Rockstroh, W. Lutzenberger, & N. Birbaumer (Eds.),Self-regulation of the brain and behavior. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Sheer, D. (1984). Focused arousal, 40-Hz EEG and dysfunction. In T. Elbert, B. Rockstroh, W. Lutzenberger, & N. Birbaumer (Eds.),Self-regulation of the brain and behavior. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Skinner, J. E., & Yingling, C. D. (1977). Central gating mechanisms that regulate event-related potentials and behavior. In J. Desmedt (Ed.),Attention, voluntary contraction and event-related cerebral potentials. Basel: Karger.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Stamm, J. (1984). Performance enhancement with cortical negative slow potential shifts in monkey and human. In T. Elbert, B. Rockstroh, W. Lutzenberger, & N. Birbaumer (Eds.),Self-regulation of the brain and behavior. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Stamm, J., & Kreder, S. (1979). Minimal brain dysfunction and neurophysiological disorders in hyperkinetic children. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.),Handbook of behavioral neurobiology (Vol. 2). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Stamm, J., Rockstroh, B., Elbert, T., Lutzenberger, W., Birbaumer, N., Schlotthe, P. (in preparation). Self-regulation of slow brain potentials in children with attentional problems.

  52. Sterman, M. B. (1982). EEG biofeedback in the treatment of epilepsy: An overview circa 1980. In L. White & B. Tursky (Eds.),Clinical biofeedback New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Sterman, B. (1984). The role of sensorimotor rhythmic EEG activity in the etiology and treatment of generalized motor seizures. In T. Elbert, B. Rockstroh, W. Lutzenberger, & N. Birbaumer (Eds.),Self-regulation of the brain and behavior Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Walter, W. G., Cooper, R., Aldridge, V., McCallum, W. C., & Winter, A. L. (1964). Contingent negative variation: An electrical sign of sensorimotor association and expectancy in the human brain.Nature, 203 380–385.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Wyler, A. R. (1980). Operant control of CNS activity. In J. S. Lockard, A. A. Ward (Eds.),Epilepsy New York: Raven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Wyler, A. (1984). Operant conditioning of single neurons in monkeys and its theoretical application to EEG conditioning in human epilepsy. In T. Elbert, B. Rockstroh, W. Lutzenberger, & N. Birbaumer (Eds.),Self-regulation of the brain and behavior Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Yates, A. (1980).Biofeedback and modification of behavior New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prof. Dr. Niels Birbaumer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rockstroh, B., Birbaumer, N., Elbert, T. et al. Operant control of EEG and event-related and slow brain potentials. Biofeedback and Self-Regulation 9, 139–160 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00998830

Download citation

Descriptor Key Words

  • slow brain potentials
  • even related potentials
  • EEG conditioning
  • sensorimotor rhythm